Proposed deletion of Sam Kohan

edit

Hello, Seatlewa. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sam Kohan, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dps04 (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: The Sam Kohan article

edit

Hey Seatlewa,

Thanks for adding references for the article Sam Kohan. I am, however, still concerned about the article, since it has relied on too many primary sources (e.g. the subject's page in Harvard, the ESLP), and my original concern that this article may not meet WP:GNG still stands. Consequently, I have decided to unreview this article for the time being. In all event, I noticed you also edited the Sharam Kohan article. May I ask whether these two articles are writing about the same subject? Thanks. --Dps04 (talk) 02:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam Kohan

edit

Hello Seatlewa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sam Kohan for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Juristicweb (talk) 04:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply