December 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Roper v. Simmons  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 19:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roper v. Simmons with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — MusikAnimal talk 19:25, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roper v. Simmons, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Roper v. Simmons was changed by Ultrimite (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904422 on 2014-12-07T19:07:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Roper v. Simmons has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  - Barek (talkcontribs) - 02:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply