User talk:TechnoSquirrel69/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your use of rollback
Per WP:ROLLBACKUSE this use was inappropriate, please exercise more care in the future. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:19F4:3AE2:C47C:384D (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can no longer read the diff as the page has been deleted, but I'm assuming you're the person who added the
<noinclude>...</noinclude>tags? If so, I apologize, as I seem to have mistaken you for someone else — editing under a similar IPv6 address — who was violating their block. I appreciate you taking the time to leave me a message, and I'll be more careful when reading IP addresses in the future! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)- I understand, sounds good, and yes that was the diff I was referring to. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E41E:B141:7B5:2EF0 (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Beauty and the Beast (Mark Murphy album)
Hi@TechnoSquirrel69, I added a clarification to the article, as requested. The cited source assigns ratings with "bones" instead of "stars", from "woof to 5 bones". Thanks for the edits! CoralRad (talk) 00:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that, CoralRad! By the way, I noticed a higher-quality version of the cover art for this album exists at its Amazon listing — consider uploading that one instead. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TechnoSquirrel69 I changed the cover per your suggestion. I am relatively new at this, should I remove the "clarification needed" from the article? CoralRad (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yep; in general, any editor can remove cleanup tags if they feel the issues in question have been adequately addressed. If you think so, go ahead! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TechnoSquirrel69 I changed the cover per your suggestion. I am relatively new at this, should I remove the "clarification needed" from the article? CoralRad (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Clorinda
Sorry, I didn't get any kind of notification. Something just appeared on my talk page and I was reminded I hadn't checked on the relisted discussion.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- No issues! I think it was my mistake to try and ping you through XFDcloser — I'm not sure if pings go through those messages. In any case, the discussion seems to have closed in your favor. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. And to clarify, I got a notification about something entirely unrelated.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Appreciating your comments
Hello @TechoSquirrel69 Senior editors have an eagle's eye that can capture such details as mentioned. As a junior editor, myself, I always take them heartedly and rework to address the issues. I believe that the content of the article is of public interest (the well being of Swahili language), so I shall try to keep on pushing it. Thanks. Dee Soulza (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Dee Soulza: Thanks for your message. While I admire your desire to uphold what I assume is your linguistic heritage by writing about the Swahili language, please remember not to let that translate into a biased writing style. As I mentioned in my review, we need to try our best to remain neutral on the subjects we're writing about — our goal is not to convince the reader of anything or highlight any one perspective. The encyclopedia simply summarizes the information provided in reliable sources without adding any interpretations. I wish you luck with writing your draft article. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Dee Soulza (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Last name
| Hatting sockpuppetry |
|---|
| —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
Thank you, didn't mean to edit an archive of a talk page. Probably could ask you for help. There is a good bit of misunderstanding on here about how to talk about family members with the same last names. It's generally established that you use first names to distinguish which person is being referenced. You can see FM Sky doesn't think so. Deliciously (talk) 02:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Hello, may you reopen the discussion for Dark Deco, so I don't have to re-nominate it? Even with no comments, no quorum is not a "do nothing" close, and should have either been acted upon as I suggested (retargeted to a Batman related topic such as Batman: The Animated Series, one of the only relevant uses of this term on Wikipedia), or remained open to garner further comments, per WP:NOQUORUM (or Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes#No quorum for RfD specific). I would prefer not to unilaterally retarget in the meantime as there are multiple options, but the status quo is not one and has no support. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Utopes! Thanks for reminding me about the silent consensus principle, which slipped my mind when I closed this discussion. I don't have time to do so at the moment, but I will overturn my closure and re-close the discussion later this evening or tomorrow. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Utopes: Thanks for your patience; done. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sea of Voices
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sea of Voices you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sea of Voices
The article Sea of Voices you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sea of Voices and Talk:Sea of Voices/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sea of Voices
The article Sea of Voices you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sea of Voices for comments about the article, and Talk:Sea of Voices/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 10:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Worlds (Porter Robinson album)
Nomination of Dani Cavallaro for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Cavallaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Note
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohd_Amri_Yahyah
https://cms.fam.org.my/v1/teamdetail/czo4OiJjbXMucGFmYyI7/T2024TM3
(team player 17, can the page be updated since sources prove he is not retired...) 93.138.236.53 (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there, and thanks for contributing to this article! My primary concern with your changes was that this person had announced their retirement relatively recently, so it's questionable to use a database to prove that they're still active as it might not have been updated. You will need to provide a reliable source dated after the retirement announcements to confirm that the subject is still playing. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- it is website of club founded this year, so way to implement correct data should be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.139.165 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- That clarifies the date then, but I'm unsure I would consider that website a reliable source regardless. As I mentioned in my edit summary earlier, you might be better served by waiting for a response on the article's talk page and discussing the situation with an editor more knowledgeable about this general topic area — I'm certainly not the most prolific editor of articles on sportspeople. Also, do you operate the Cenderabird account? If you do, I would highly recommend logging in when you edit to prevent possible concerns of sockpuppetry. Let me know if I can help in any other way. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- im with ip only. that is malay fa website, i dont know what next... if you are prolific with reverting sources, good luck. once it will get changed, very strange situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.139.165 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying the detail about the account. I'm not quite sure I understand the rest of your message, but another editor may be able to help you out on the talk page. You might also consider asking your question at the Teahouse, where experienced editors will be able to help you out. Also, in accordance with the talk page guideline, please make sure you're signing and indenting your messages. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- im with ip only. that is malay fa website, i dont know what next... if you are prolific with reverting sources, good luck. once it will get changed, very strange situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.139.165 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- That clarifies the date then, but I'm unsure I would consider that website a reliable source regardless. As I mentioned in my edit summary earlier, you might be better served by waiting for a response on the article's talk page and discussing the situation with an editor more knowledgeable about this general topic area — I'm certainly not the most prolific editor of articles on sportspeople. Also, do you operate the Cenderabird account? If you do, I would highly recommend logging in when you edit to prevent possible concerns of sockpuppetry. Let me know if I can help in any other way. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- it is website of club founded this year, so way to implement correct data should be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.139.165 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award
|
Worm Gear Award | ||
| This award is given in recognition to TechnoSquirrel69 for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award
| The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
| This award is given in recognition to TechnoSquirrel69 for accumulating at least 50 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
- Appreciate it, Josh! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
How do I delete my draft?
Hey, I’m back, I hope you are doing well. I have a minor technical question: I accidentally created a normale draft instead of going through the article wizard like I wanted to. This may be a dumb question, but how do I delete it (on mobile)? FortunateSons (talk) 18:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again, FortunateSons, and thanks for the well wishes — I'm hanging in there! I want to note that there's nothing wrong with creating a draft directly without using the Article Wizard, and it shouldn't impact your writing process very much. If you still want to, you can request deletion under CSD G7 by placing {{db-author}} at the top, provided you are the only editor who's made substantive contributions to the page. Let me know if you have any other questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I’m glad you’re doing ok. Yeah, that was what I was looking for.
- I’m know that there isn’t anything wrong with doing it directly, but I still prefer working with the added structure that the AW provides, particularly as this is only my second BLP.
- Thank you very much for the help :) FortunateSons (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please
Next time can you provide a link to the WP:RSN discussion when removing content? I was utterly confused by your broad edit summary that x source was unreliable. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Will do, Knowledgekid87! I had initially been pasting a boilerplate edit summary containing a link to the discussion, but I must have switched to the wrong one somewhere along the way. Thanks for the heads-up./ —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Request to Review Draft
Hey there
I changed my article Draft:Sukesha to wikitext. I also added some citations. Would love for you to review it and share your thoughts to help me improve. Yatharthsrivastava (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Yatharthsrivastava, thanks for making those changes. I don't typically conduct AfC reviews on request, and I'm also not familiar with the topic area of Indian mythology, so it might be better to leave it for another reviewer. Let me know if you have any other questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia new page patrol backlog drives indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Exchange review?
Hi there. I've just noticed you nominated Mai Fujisawa. I happened to have recently nominated Musashi Miyamoto (Vagabond). It's a small article too so I wonder if you are interested in exchanging reviews if you don't have problem. I prose skills aren't pretty good so Musashi was copyedited before nominating it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Tintor2! Sure, I'd be happy to review your nomination. I can't do so immediately, as I have some off-wiki busywork to get to this week, but I should have more time to conduct the review towards the end of next week. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: I've opened the review for your nominee. However, I've decided to retract my nomination of Mai Fujisawa due to issues I have with the sourcing which I don't believe can be solved in a way that gels well with the GA criteria to my satisfaction. I'll be around with comments in the next couple of days! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer
Promotion of List of accolades received by The Boy and the Heron
| story · music · places |
|---|
- Welcome to WP:QAI, and congratulations to the quality work I see on this page alone! List your articles for review on top of the project talk, - and review ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I appreciate the welcome, Gerda — thanks for stopping by! I'll be a little busy for the next week or so, but I'll take a look at the QAI talk page when I can. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update, Gerda; I also have an article planned for the drive but am finding it more difficult than I thought to track down reviews in obscure science fiction magazines! I would be more careful about how you attract people to your ITN nomination — directly calling for support in this way could be interpreted as canvassing. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, also for improving article quality in June! - Today we have a centenarian story (documentation about it by Percy Adlon) and an article that had two sentences yesterday and was up for deletion, and needs a few more citations. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update, Gerda; I also have an article planned for the drive but am finding it more difficult than I thought to track down reviews in obscure science fiction magazines! I would be more careful about how you attract people to your ITN nomination — directly calling for support in this way could be interpreted as canvassing. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
3rd coord for the DCWC
hey, we've got less than 2 weeks until the developing countries contest starts, and no one's offered to be a third coordinator - at one point you said you'd be willing if no one else volunteered. given that both @Ixtal & i will each be offline temporarily at different points during the contest, would you like to join us officially? ... sawyer * he/they * talk 20:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- As long as Ixtal is on board, I'd love to! It's been great getting to help set up the contest, and continuing in that shepherding role once the real work begins sounds right up my alley. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm on board. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, then let's get started. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm on board. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Sea of Voices
On 21 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sea of Voices, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Sea of Voices" was well-received by Porter Robinson's fans even though it was a fundamental change from his prior musical style? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sea of Voices. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sea of Voices), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Draft reviewed
Hi TechnoSquirrel69,
I wanted to say thank you for taking the time and reviewing my draft about a scientist 2 days ago. I reached out to couple of people from wiki community to give me advice on what can be changed in order to improve the article and I made many amends since then based on the recommendations. Would you mind to please check the draft Draft:Mark Kotter again and let me know your thoughts? I'm still learning a lot about editing Wikipedia and I found this community is incredible and so helpful.
Best wishes,
Damjana Damjana12 (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Damjana12, thanks for making those changes on the draft and I'm glad to know you're feeling comfortable in the community! I don't typically review AfC submissions on request, and almost never for drafts I've already reviewed in the past. In the interest of keeping the process impartial, I think it would be best to let another reviewer take this one; your draft is already in the queue and will be picked up in time. Let me know if you have any other questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your response and for understanding my situation. I appreciate the clarification on the review process and completely understand the need for impartiality. It's great to know that my draft is already in the queue and will be reviewed in due course.
- I don't have any further questions at the moment, but I’ll be sure to reach out if something comes up. Thanks again for your guidance and support!
- Best regards, Damjana Damjana12 (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Mass message sender granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:
- Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
- For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
- The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.
- You can create a new MMS list of users by moving one from this page.
- Consider sending a test message to yourself, to ensure that the message doesn't contain broken HTML that breaks talk pages.
- Messages should be signed. Unsigned messages will not be archived by bots.
- Messages should be signed before sending, so that they do not mass ping users who are linked in the message.
For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elli (talk • contribs) 21:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated, Elli! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Editor of the Week
| Editor of the Week | ||
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- In early February of 2024 TechnoSquirrel69 made a small repair to the Editor of the Week nomination page. Curious, I chased it down and discovered an editor that is a prime example of doing what it takes to retain new editors. He has almost 20000 edits with a solid 40% in mainspace. His outgoing nature and willingness to take the time to show new editors "the road less travelled", through his kindness and communication, deserve attention and recognition. His talk page archives contain interactions with new editors that are examples we can all learn from. Seconded by Sohom and Ixtal.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
| TechnoSquirrel is a climber |
| TechnoSquirrel69 |
| Editor of the Week for the week beginning July 7, 2024 |
| In early February 2024 Editor TechnoSquirrel69 made a small repair to the Editor of the Week nomination page. Curious, I chased it down and discovered an editor that is a prime example of doing what it takes to retain new editors. He has almost 20000 edits with a solid 40% in mainspace. His outgoing nature and willingness to take the time to show new editors "the road less travelled", through his kindness and communication, deserve attention and recognition. His talk page archives contain interactions with new editors that are examples we can all learn from. |
| Recognized for |
| providing guidance and support |
| Notable work |
| Castle in the Sky |
| Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 10:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Buster7, Ixtal, and Sohom Datta: Can't thank y'all enough! It's a genuine honor to be recognized for any of my work here, and I hope to continue doing as much of it as I can for the foreseeable future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)