Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doge Weather

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doge Weather (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Non-notable app?} that now has a giant Nazi flag displayed. Does this app really merit an article? Plantdrew (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Largely fails WP:SUSTAINED, the only reliable, in depth coverage is in Slate, the other coverage is either in unreliable sources or listicles. The vast majority of the cited sources are from a brief period of a few months in early 2014. Hemiauchenia (talk) 07:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete Website appears defunct now, the Slate article is only one RS. The Washington one is ok-ish, but the rest aren't, so I don't think we have enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and Websites. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The only coverage is a blip of clickbait articles when Doge was trending in 2014, with the exception of this trivial coverage in a listicle. There is no WP:SUSTAINED coverage of this article's subject, and even ignoring WP:SUSTAINED's point that Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability, I agree with Oaktree b; the article fails WP:GNG either way, but if you take WP:SUSTAINED into account the article falls far short of approaching notability. The flag was added as part of drive-by vandalism across multiple articles and isn't relevant to the article at all. - Aoidh (talk) 22:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.