Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Force Sustainment Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force Sustainment Center

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a carbon copy of https://www.afsc.af.mil/About-Us/, which is in public domain, but retains tone issues. I do not believe there exists sufficient amount of information in independent sources to justify a article instead of a section in United States Air Force. My search in Google News is unfruitful, and while I did find some coverage in Google Scholar, they are either written or sponsored by the US Air force, like the RAND air force. , Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Aviation, and Oklahoma. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This content should not be removed as it is consistent with other Air Force organizations listed within Wikipedia. Additionally, the Air Force Sustainment Center is similar in content and tone as other centers listed under Air Force Materiel Command's Wikipedia page. Gradye80 (talk) 14:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that other Air Force organizations are in a similar state as this article, citing only sources written by the air force and having promotional tone. They require improvement, and if insufficient independent sources exist, deletion as well. Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recently removed content that could be perceived of as having a promotional tone. The remaining content is matter of fact and relevant to Wikipedia users who may research USAF or other world-wide air forces. Gradye80 (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. Other pages exist isn't a great argument. If an article with an appropriate level of detail and neutrality is written, it can always go back in place of the redirect. tedder (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as consisting solely of primary sources and failing Wikipedia:Notability. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.