Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Invention
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Excess category
editThankyou America1000 for invitiong me to join the project, but IMHO think this is a category "too far" and I think the energy should be expended in maybe other Projects, such as Technology. Ta. Jabberwoch (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
editHello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
editHello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Article alerts added
editI have added article alerts to this WikiProject. I hope someone here finds it useful? Ottawahitech (talk) 11:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)please ping me
Popular pages report
editWe – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Invention/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Invention.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Invention, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
National invention categories
editSee Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Technology#National invention categories Andy Dingley (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hatnote
editShould there be a hatnote pointing to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day? WP:A11 specifically uses "invented". LaundryPizza03 (talk) 12:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
editA new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Inventions by century
editHelp me expand the Category:Inventions by century tree! –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
editHello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
List of Chinese inventions
editI have nominated List of Chinese inventions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
List of Chinese inventions
editI have nominated List of Chinese inventions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
editHello, |
Similar/confusing articles
editI am confused by these articles that have similar titles and unclear scopes.
- Timeline of historic inventions (WikiProject Invention|class=list|importance=top): I was reading this article and became confused when I got to the 21st century because there were only two inventions listed.
- History of technology : I don't know the difference. But it clearly has a difference approach and structure.
- Timeline of scientific discoveries: This one seems slightly different in title. But some sort of clear disambiguating statement would be helpful to fight entropy.
- I didn't do any sort of systematic search, so I have no idea how many other similar articles there may be.
- All of these articles are "claimed" by multiple WikiProjects.
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
editHello, |
Merger proposal
editI have proposed that Inventor be merged into Invention. Please see Talk:Invention#Merger proposal, and share your opinions. Cnilep (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Cheman Shaik up for deletion
edit- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Cheman Shaik (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion
Indian inventor. Question of notability and sourcing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
editI have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
editQuality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Inquiry on draft for article topic: Leigh Rothschild
editHello, I wanted to get some feedback, as well as assistance on a draft article I've been infrequently working on. The topic of said article is about individual Leigh Rothschild, a somewhat notorious individual in the tech sphere, particularly for patent troll actions and behavior.
The reason for his notoriety is his holding of a numerous amount of patents, either directly or through a holding company. For example, they've been mentioned multiple times by the EFF, as well as having a suit filed against him earlier this year by Valve Corporation.
Good article reassessment for Wright brothers
editWright brothers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)