Jump to content

Criticism of Windows Vista

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mikker (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 9 November 2006 (→‎Similarities with Mac OS X: rm info that's not needed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.

Steps to list an article for deletion: {{subst:afd}} • Preloaded debate OR {{subst:afd2|pg=Criticism of Windows Vista|cat=|text=}} • {{subst:afd3|pg=Criticism of Windows Vista}} log

Main article: Windows Vista

Windows Vista, the next version of Microsoft's desktop operating system, has been the target of a number of negative assessments by various groups. Criticism of Windows Vista has included concerns about the security implications of the large amounts of new code, the inclusion of a number of new Digital Rights Management technologies aimed at restricting the copying of digital media, and the usability of the new User Account Control security technology. Companies that produce security software such as McAfee and Symantec have also lodged complaints that Microsoft has implemented new security measures that prevent their software from being able to access certain parts of the operating system. Additionally, reviewers have noted similarities between the Vista interface and that of Apple's Mac OS X operating system. Concerns have also been raised about many PCs meeting "Vista Premium Ready" hardware requirements.

Security

In a July 2006 report,[1] security software vendor (and recently a competitor to Microsoft's OneCare) Symantec's Advanced Threat Research Team said that the large amount of new and untested code in Vista, especially the new implementation of the network stack, could cause instability and new security flaws.[2] The report claims that "Microsoft has removed a large body of tried and tested code and replaced it with freshly written code, complete with new corner cases and defects." Microsoft responded that they "believe the claims are ... unsubstantiated," and Symantec admits that all of the bugs Symantec found were fixed by the time Beta 2 was released, but adds that "While it is reassuring that Microsoft is finding and fixing these defects, we expect that vulnerabilities will continue to be discovered for some time. A networking stack is a complex piece of software that takes many years to mature." IPv6 tunnelling and peer-to-peer collaboration technologies were identified as additional potential problem areas. Firewall maker Agnitum and others have argued that the Kernel Patch Protection feature (also known as "Patchguard") for the 64-bit version can be circumvented by hackers and that some security software makers must use similar methods.[3][4]

McAfee has also said that Vista will be even less secure than previous versions of Windows. [1]

Third party applications

In Vista, Microsoft has a feature called PatchGuard on 64-bit versions that locks down the kernel of the OS. Microsoft's argument is that this will keep miscreants out of the OS and reduce the incidence of attacks, and it is something for which customers have been asking.

However, the computer security company McAfee said that since PatchGuard also prevents third-party security companies from getting inside the OS, they can't activate crucial security measures in their software to protect the OS from intruders. [2]

Digital Rights Management

Another common criticism concerns the integration of new forms of Digital Rights Management into the operating system, specifically High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) and the Image Constraint Token (ICT), which reduces the quality of high-definition video content if the video card and monitor are not HDCP-enabled.[5] All HD DVD and Blu-ray players must follow AACS guidelines and restrict the resolution for outputs without HDCP to 960×540 provided an ICT flag is given. The decision to set the flag to restrict output ("down-convert") is left to the content provider. The criticism against HDCP may be misplaced, however, as it is still unclear as to whether all high definition media will be subject to HDCP protection.[5] Movie studios are apparently in agreement to not include the ICT flag on any HD DVDs or Blu-ray Discs until at least 2010, or possibly even 2012.[6]

User Account Control

The new User Account Control (UAC) security technology also causes concern among reviewers. While Yankee Group analyst Andrew Jaquith believes that critical security vulnerabilities may be "reduced by as much as 80 percent", he also noted that "while the new security system shows promise, it is far too chatty and annoying".[7] Veteran Microsoft reporter Paul Thurrott agreed, contending at the time that the implementation of UAC in Vista build 5342 is a "sad, sad joke" given the number of dialog boxes that one must wade through to do simple tasks.[8] However, Thurrott appears to have retracted those comments, claiming in his Windows Vista Beta 2 review, that UAC had been "completely overhauled" and is "less annoying," although he acknowledges that Microsoft is "still struggling to find a balance between security and annoyance."[9] It should be noted that UAC is easily turned off in Windows Vista Build 5384.

Similarities with Mac OS X

Another criticism is a claim by some that Windows Vista emulates specific features in Apple Computer's Mac OS X. Scott Spanbauer of PCWorld jokes about a perceived "striking similarity" between Vista's Aero visual effects, icon design, buttons and those of Mac OS X's Aqua.[10] Paul Thurrott of WindowsITPro made similar comments in his review of build 5308, while also suggesting that some of the new applications "appear to be directly, ahem, influenced by similar applications in OS X."[8] John Rizzo of eWeek has noted that Vista is incorporating features which OS X has had for some time, such as fast searching and Smart Folders functionality.[11] This has led some to the conclusion that Aero is an imitation of Aqua.[12] Apple was keen to highlight the similarities during the keynote presentation at the Worldwide Developers Conference in August 2006, with Bertrand Serlet showing screenshots of Vista and OS X side-by-side.[13] [14] [15] However, some of the features that Apple pundits accuse Microsoft of copying appear to have potentially originated from early versions of Windows Vista (then called Longhorn) and other applications. Due in part to Apple's habit of shipping smaller releases more often and Microsoft's elongated development cycle for Vista -- some of the major delays were because of such things like SP2 (originally intended for Longhorn) -- Apple was able to bring these features to market before Vista could be finished. Microsoft showed early versions of Desktop Search and Sidebar in early 2003 and applications like Konfabulator and SuperKaramba existed significantly before Apple's Dashboard.

Hardware requirements

Considerable speculation and questions about the hardware required to run Vista were eventually dispelled when Microsoft revealed its own requirements and recommendations in March 2006.[16] However, controversy and concerns have arisen over how the increase in hardware specifications required to take advantage of many of Vista's new features may impact both personal and business users.[17] Elizabeth Judge of The Times stated that “the system’s full range of tools would be available to less than 5 per cent of Britain’s PC market” and that it “would run in full only on super-advanced PCs”. This has raised concerns that users wanting to enjoy the full experience would be forced to buy expensive new equipment, even though the minimum hardware specifications for Vista indicate that it will run on most PCs sold over the last three years. A Microsoft spokeswoman countered these claims by denying that current PC users would be unable to use Vista, stating, “A recent analyst report states that nearly all PCs on the market today will run Windows Vista.”[18] While most PCs purchased over the last three years will be able to meet Vista’s minimum “Windows Vista Capable” requirements, many laptops and low-end to midrange desktops with integrated graphics will not be able to meet “Windows Vista Premium Ready” requirements and will therefore not be able to run advanced features such as the Aero Glass interface.[19] In addition, the Windows Vista Premium logo requirement for a hybrid hard disk incorporating flash memory that is intended to help reduce overall power consumption and extend battery life has also emerged as a significant issue for laptops, which are often more difficult and expensive to upgrade than desktops. Very few laptops are currently available with this type of hard disk.[20][21]

Anti-trust controversy in Europe

The European Union Competition Commission has raised questions with Microsoft about Vista concerning compliance with EU rules intended to allow competition between security providers on the merits of their products. Commission spokesman Jonathan Todd stated, "If business and home users are deprived of choice, a security 'monoculture' based on Microsoft products may lead to less innovation and could harm all computer users. Security risks could increase, and not decrease." Todd also stated that, "it is Microsoft's responsibility as a 'near monopolist' to abide by EU competition rules - in particular, those that prohibit abuse of a dominant market position." Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer met with EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes in August 2006 to discuss EU concerns. Responding to EU concerns, Jack Evans, a Microsoft spokesman, stated, "We still have not received the guidance we're seeking. In July, we received a formal list of questions, but no answers about what specific concerns the Commission has, or how we should address them. We need answers, not questions." Evans went on to state "The bottom line is that we want to launch Vista in a fully lawful manner, and we want to avoid regulatory decisions that could increase security risks for European consumers." There has been speculation that this issue may delay the release of Vista in Europe, but as of September 2006 the Europe release date has not been affected.[22]

Pricing and license restrictions

Microsoft's pricing of Vista has been criticized by some as too expensive. A majority of users in a poll said that the prices of various Windows Vista editions posted on the Microsoft Canada website in August 2006 make the product too expensive.[23]

The introduction of restrictions on retail buyers legally transferring their copy of Vista was criticized. Microsoft had changed the licensing terms for Vista to allow buyers of retail copies of Vista to transfer their software to a new machine only once.[24] If they wanted to move their software a second time, they would have had to buy a new copy. Since then, Microsoft has responded to the complaints and has changed the terms to allowing buyers to uninstall it from a PC and install it on another multiple times.[25] Separate rules will apply for OEM versions of Windows installed on new PCs. In most cases, copies of Windows Vista purchased on a new PC will not be able to be legally transferred.[26]

See also

References

  1. ^ Oliver Friedrichs (July 18 2006). "Windows Vista: Network Attack Surface Analysis". Symantec Security Response Weblog. Symantec. Retrieved 2006-08-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  2. ^ Joris Evers (July 18 2006). "Symantec sees an Achilles' heel in Vista". CNet News.com. Retrieved 2006-08-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  3. ^ "Agnitum analyzes latest Microsoft security initiatives". Agnitum. July 26 2006. Retrieved 2006-08-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  4. ^ Joris Evers (August 10 2006). "Windows defense handcuffs good guys". CNET News.com. Retrieved 2006-08-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  5. ^ a b M. Dowler (October 21 2005). "Windows Vista, HDCP and Digital Rights Management". PC Stats. Retrieved 2006-05-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  6. ^ Ken Fisher (May 21, 2006). "Hollywood reportedly in agreement to delay forced quality downgrades for Blu-ray, HD DVD". {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ Joris Evers (May 2006). "Report: Vista to hit anti-spyware, firewall markets". PC World.
  8. ^ a b Paul Thurrott (April 19 2006). "Windows Vista February 2006 CTP (Build 5308/5342) Review, Part 5: Where Vista Fails". SuperSite for Windows. Retrieved 2006-05-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help) Cite error: The named reference "thurrott5308" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ Paul Thurrott (May 20 2006). "Windows Vista Beta 2 Review: Part 1: The Big Picture". SuperSite for Windows. Retrieved 2006-05-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  10. ^ Scott Spanbauer (April 2006). "Windows Hacks: Vista Comes Into View". PCWorld. Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  11. ^ John Rizzo (July 31 2005). "Apple's Tiger vs. Windows Vista: Who Comes Out Ahead?". eWeek. Retrieved 2006-05-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  12. ^ "Windows Vista resembles OS X". MacNN. March 9 2006. Retrieved 2006-05-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  13. ^ "WWDC 2006 Keynote transcript". macrumors.com. August 7 2006. Retrieved 2006-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  14. ^ "Apple takes shots at Vista". Cnet news.com. August 10 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  15. ^ "Video of WWDC". youtube.com. Retrieved 2006-09-21. {{cite web}}: Text "September 17 2006" ignored (help)
  16. ^ Paul Thurrott (March 29 2006). "Finally, Microsoft Releases Windows Vista Hardware Requirements". WinInfo. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  17. ^ Mitch Wagner (March 01 2006). "Microsoft Will Stumble On Windows Vista And Office 2007". Informationweek.com. Retrieved 2006-08-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  18. ^ Elizabeth Judge (May 20 2006). "Windows revamp 'too advanced for most PCs'". The Times. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  19. ^ John G. Spooner and Mary Jo Foley (August 5 2005). "Will Your PC Run Windows Vista?". eweek.com. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  20. ^ Luke Peters (July 18 2006). "How Vista will affect notebooks". Personal Computer World. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  21. ^ Jeff Rosado (September 15 2006). "Microsoft opens up Customer Preview Program (CPP) for Vista public testing on September 15th, 2006". PRO-networks.org. Retrieved 2006-09-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  22. ^ Joris Evers (September 18 2006). "Vista's European battleground". CNET News.com. Retrieved 2006-09-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  23. ^ Stan Beer (August 30 2006). "Windows Vista too expensive says users". ITWire.com. Retrieved 2006-10-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  24. ^ http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/13/vista_license_only_l.html
  25. ^ Nick White (November 2 2006). ""Revision to Windows Vista licensing terms". Windows Vista Team Blog. Retrieved 2006-11-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  26. ^ Ina Fried (October 16 2006). "Microsoft limits Vista transfers". CNET News.com. Retrieved 2006-10-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Windows_Vista&oldid=86787561"