Talk:Bogdan Khmelnitsky Battalion
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessed by the ISW
@Salfanto, Where the ISW has assessed that "the battalion engaged Ukrainian forces near the village of Urozhaine" [1] ? ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- In their campaign assessment: https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-december-28-2023 Salfanto (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- But I don't see the ISW assessed that. Please provide the quote. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT, DECEMBER 28, 2023: ISW continues to assess that the use of Ukrainian POWs in the “Bogdan Khmelnitsky” battalion is likely a violation of The Geneva Convention on POWs, which prohibits the use of POWs in military activities on the side of the power that has captured them and states that “no POW may at any time be sent to or detained in areas where he may be exposed to the fire of the combat zone” and shall not “be employed on labor which is of an unhealthy or dangerous nature.” Salfanto (talk) 23:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- But I don't see the ISW assessed that. Please provide the quote. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class national militaries articles
- National militaries task force articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles