Talk:Entoloma sinuatum: Revision history

25 January 2024

• curprev 02:5502:55, 25 January 2024‎ Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs‎ 31,776 bytes +31‎ Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

9 November 2020

• curprev 22:4122:41, 9 November 2020‎ MajavahBot talk contribs‎ m 31,745 bytes +134‎ Bot: Fill missing DYK blurb undo

24 December 2016

• curprev 21:0421:04, 24 December 2016‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 31,611 bytes +1,076‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1) undo

24 July 2015

• curprev 04:5204:52, 24 July 2015‎ Crisco 1492 talk contribs‎ 30,535 bytes +25‎ schedule for TFA undo

23 December 2011

• curprev 19:5219:52, 23 December 2011‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 30,510 bytes +164‎ →‎A source to track down sometime: Ah, well never mind then--I saw it mentioned on the French wiki article. Cheers, ~~~~ undo
• curprev 19:4619:46, 23 December 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 30,346 bytes +225‎ →‎A source to track down sometime undo
• curprev 19:1919:19, 23 December 2011‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 30,121 bytes +284‎ →‎A source to track down sometime: new section undo

20 June 2011

• curprev 20:2420:24, 20 June 2011‎ TonyTheTiger talk contribs‎ 29,837 bytes +10‎ |four=yes undo

10 February 2011

• curprev 03:4803:48, 10 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 29,827 bytes +137‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 03:3503:35, 10 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 29,690 bytes +472‎ nice undo
• curprev 03:3403:34, 10 February 2011‎ Ucucha talk contribs‎ 29,218 bytes +401‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: reply undo
• curprev 03:2203:22, 10 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 28,817 bytes +257‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 01:5101:51, 10 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 28,560 bytes +211‎ Aww, lyric is good, remember we're aiming for "brilliant prose" :) undo
• curprev 01:2501:25, 10 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ m 28,349 bytes +1‎ indent undo
• curprev 01:1301:13, 10 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 28,348 bytes +538‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo

9 February 2011

• curprev 23:2123:21, 9 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 27,810 bytes +433‎ Wow! undo
• curprev 21:2221:22, 9 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 27,377 bytes +1,371‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 04:2704:27, 9 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 26,006 bytes +244‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 04:2304:23, 9 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 25,762 bytes +265‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 03:1003:10, 9 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 25,497 bytes +689‎ Thx Mike :) Circeus I got the 1999 Reduilh article where he proposes conserving ''lividum'', and teh followup where it was opposed 11-1 (did I send you them????). I failed to find the French papers, and my email to Machiel Noordeloos bounced. I'll re undo
• curprev 01:0001:00, 9 February 2011‎ Mike Christie talk contribs‎ 24,808 bytes +320‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: Reply undo

8 February 2011

• curprev 22:3722:37, 8 February 2011‎ GimmeBot talk contribs‎ m 24,488 bytes +117‎ Bot updating {{ArticleHistory}} undo
• curprev 15:1915:19, 8 February 2011‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 24,371 bytes +380‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC undo
• curprev 12:4612:46, 8 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 23,991 bytes +352‎ '''update''' - okay guys, is it clearer now? I have reworded so the first para on how the three common scientific names came about, and the second is later jostling over the names and reasons for final ruling. undo
• curprev 12:3012:30, 8 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 23,639 bytes +1,055‎ Okay - this is how Reduilh describes it - Bulliard illustrates and names a mushroom ''Agaricus lividus'', along with some notes, which point to it describing a species of ''Pluteus''. Quelet comes along and writes up a new description of ''Entoloma l undo
• curprev 08:1208:12, 8 February 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 22,584 bytes +227‎ I just have to redownload the 99 Rediulh Taxon paper and read it again. Back soon. undo
• curprev 04:0004:00, 8 February 2011‎ Ucucha talk contribs‎ 22,357 bytes +105‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: + undo
• curprev 03:5503:55, 8 February 2011‎ Ucucha talk contribs‎ 22,252 bytes +348‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: re undo
• curprev 03:4803:48, 8 February 2011‎ Mike Christie talk contribs‎ 21,904 bytes +514‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: Reply undo
• curprev 03:4203:42, 8 February 2011‎ Ucucha talk contribs‎ 21,390 bytes +559‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: reply undo
• curprev 03:3703:37, 8 February 2011‎ Mike Christie talk contribs‎ 20,831 bytes +1,662‎ →‎Paragraph confusing me at FAC: new section undo

2 January 2011

• curprev 11:0711:07, 2 January 2011‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 19,169 bytes +60‎ {{subst:FAC}} undo

31 December 2010

• curprev 21:3821:38, 31 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 19,109 bytes +469‎ Aesthetically I actually refer "Smith J" over "Smith, J.", but the latter looks less odd when placed next to "Smith, John" - which I aim for if possible. (2) Had not thought about spaces - my initial thinking is that the period makes a big enough sp undo
• curprev 16:0616:06, 31 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 18,640 bytes +689‎ →‎Checking web of science: more micro? and ref nitpicks undo
• curprev 06:4706:47, 31 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 17,951 bytes +325‎ replied to Sasata undo

22 December 2010

• curprev 08:0608:06, 22 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 17,626 bytes +325‎ →‎Checking web of science: done undo
• curprev 08:0008:00, 22 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 17,301 bytes +319‎ →‎Checking web of science: bah undo
• curprev 07:5807:58, 22 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 16,982 bytes +155‎ Brilliant! undo
• curprev 07:4907:49, 22 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 16,827 bytes +178‎ →‎Checking web of science: German stamps are PD undo
• curprev 07:2107:21, 22 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 16,649 bytes +243‎ →‎Checking web of science: who says it's the biggest? undo
• curprev 07:0307:03, 22 December 2010‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 16,406 bytes +271‎ →‎Checking web of science undo
• curprev 05:4705:47, 22 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 16,135 bytes +195‎ →‎Checking web of science: tick; add one to do undo
• curprev 04:5904:59, 22 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 15,940 bytes +519‎ ''Um, didn't realise you were not in Montreal. I just realised French is your native language so I will go and photograph the Frnech articles above (which I can't read) and email them to you. undo
• curprev 04:2904:29, 22 December 2010‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 15,421 bytes +279‎ →‎Checking web of science undo
• curprev 04:2304:23, 22 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 15,142 bytes +176‎ Go for thy life Circeus :) undo

21 December 2010

• curprev 19:3219:32, 21 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 14,966 bytes +157‎ No idea. FUR? undo
• curprev 18:4318:43, 21 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 14,809 bytes +423‎ →‎Checking web of science: stamp copyright? undo
• curprev 18:3918:39, 21 December 2010‎ Sasata talk contribs‎ 14,386 bytes +238‎ →‎Checking web of science: gills undo
• curprev 04:0104:01, 21 December 2010‎ Circeus talk contribs‎ 14,148 bytes +149‎ →‎Checking web of science undo
• curprev 03:3603:36, 21 December 2010‎ Casliber talk contribs‎ 13,999 bytes +218‎ damn - both are French only. I think there is enough info in monographs undo