This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobot(talk | contribs) at 12:35, 20 September 2012(WPBIO banner fixes + cleanup (Task: 17) using AWB (8423)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:35, 20 September 2012 by Yobot(talk | contribs)(WPBIO banner fixes + cleanup (Task: 17) using AWB (8423))
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Tunney's son, John Tunney, later was a U.S. Senator from California.
The gentleman boxer
No review of Gene Tunney can be fulfilled without showing his role as the "gentleman boxer" of the 1920s: lecturer at Harvard, reader of the classics, confidante of George Bernard Shaw and other writers. See David Margolick, "The Reader in the Ring," New York Review of Books 54(9): 46-48 (May 31, 2007) [[1]].
