Talk:George Bellows
Appearance
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Stag at Sharky's
Stag at Sharky's This work should be added and quite possibly have it's own page (linked) as it is considered Bellow's masterpiece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.16.195 (talk) 09:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I totally agree. It is the centerpiece of his recent exhibit at the National Gallery in DC and was a bold painting of movement and expression for early 1900s. --Possum4all (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Builders of Ships George Wesley Bellows 1916.jpeg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Builders of Ships George Wesley Bellows 1916.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC) |
- I've replaced it with File:George Bellows Builders of Ships.jpg; the deletion nom at Commons was that the other one was a lower res version. postdlf (talk) 22:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure why it should be deleted/replaced, as it fits the criteria for public domain.--Chimino (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- It was just because it was a lower resolution version of the same image, not because the content it represented wasn't public domain. But they really should have replaced all uses of the original image with the higher res one before listing it for deletion. postdlf (talk) 02:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure why it should be deleted/replaced, as it fits the criteria for public domain.--Chimino (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Ohio articles
- Unknown-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles