Jump to content

Talk:Keith Olbermann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 98.217.161.235 (talk) at 21:17, 3 February 2024 (→‎Controversy section: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Controversy section

Olbermann as of late has been getting into some hot water This was from a couple days ago in which he called nba star catkin Clark an idiot and people condemning his behavior which included Samuel l Jackson and Shaq. He did apologize or at least walked back the comments https://www.mediaite.com/sports/keith-olbermann-walks-back-his-take-on-the-angel-reese-after-getting-pummeled-for-calling-her-a-fcking-idiot-by-taunting-caitlin-clark/ https://nypost.com/2023/04/03/shaq-slams-keith-olbermann-for-calling-angel-reese-a-f-king-idiot/ https://www.foxnews.com/sports/shaq-rips-keith-olbermann-over-angel-reese-tweet-shut-your-dumb-a-up https://deathvalleyvoice.com/2023/04/03/keith-olbermann-catches-social-media-slack-insults-toward-lsus-angel-reese/ https://uproxx.com/viral/keith-olbermann-ashley-reese-samuel-l-jackson/

There is also his comments about Edwin Ian after he got Injured https://www.foxnews.com/sports/keith-olbermann-draws-ire-calling-world-baseball-classic-meaningless-edwin-diaz-injury https://www.mediaite.com/sports/keith-olbermann-blasted-for-clown-post-about-world-baseball-classic-players-representing-teams-where-their-grandmothers-got-laid/ 2601:188:CA80:7060:B8D3:59F7:40B2:E479 (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION violates WP:NPOV. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This content that I removed was a poorly formatted controversy section without the section header. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of the news articles are cited a d up to the standards of the site. You know you can’t just keep removing since you don’t like them and they fit the rules and articles are true. 2601:188:CA80:7060:C532:ACED:10EA:CB45 (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn’t poorly formatted 2601:188:CA80:7060:C532:ACED:10EA:CB45 (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It wasnt poorly formatted lol. What are we even doing here!?? 98.217.161.235 (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you lock the page that was unnecessary? 2601:188:CA80:7060:B8D3:59F7:40B2:E479 (talk) 20:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a rouge [sic] editor, I'm an admin and I imagine that I know the rules here better than you do. This is a WP:BLP and any new addition that is objected to requires WP:CONSENSUS. I have protected the page for now to stop you from edit warring. Your disruptive editing made it necessary. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Poor formatting is evident at the very beginning of the content where you start a sentence November 2020 after the 2020 election... In that paragraph, you then go on to make the comment Olbermann’s racially charged comment in Wikivoice. I see lots of poor sourcing from WP:NYPOST and WP:FOXNEWS. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was very necessary. Muboshgu, is this the return of User:JohnPaos? Drmies (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't thought about who it is, I'm usually slow to connect it to sockpuppetry. It could well be. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JohnPaos, it checks out. It's the same content. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Romantic partners

Should there not at least in the personal section be a mention of WNBC's Katy Tur with whom he lived for three years? Rustygecko (talk) 06:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. On her Wikipedia page there is mention of it. luckymustard (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]