Jump to content

Talk:Kaylee Hottle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gamowebbed (talk | contribs) at 12:53, 30 March 2024 (→‎Deafness: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Deafness

There is zero reason to leave out from the lead section that Kaylee Hottle is deaf. All reliable sources mention her deafness. It is completely in line with MOS:OPENPARABIO and MOS:BIOFIRSTSENTENCE to state this context. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 03:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik: Look up the definition of censorship and educate yourself with other articles before making baseless accusations. 🅶🅰🅼🅾🆆🅴🅱🅱🅴🅳 (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop censoring the lead section. Kaylee Hottle's deafness is central to her. You have zero reason to exclude it. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where the hell did you learn the word "censorship" from? Its not being censored at all when the info is still in the article 😂 🅶🅰🅼🅾🆆🅴🅱🅱🅴🅳 (talk) 12:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I did read your edit summary, and other stuff exists. It does not prove or disprove anything, and they do mention the blindness and deafblindness respectively. Neither are GA or FA, where the GA Shaylee Mansfield mentions it. Are you familiar with WP:LEAD which says, "The lead should identify the topic and summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight"? It also says, "The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic." Her film appearances and her deafness are the key identifiers, everything else is details about these elements.
Explain why Kaylee Hottle's lead section should not mention her deafness at all. Do you somehow consider it offensive to mention this about her, despite all the reliable sources mentioning it? Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]