Jump to content

Talk:Oxymetazoline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by D A Patriarche (talk | contribs) at 19:39, 19 February 2023 (→‎Comparison to xylometazoline: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPharmacology Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does it raise blood pressure or not?

Article isn't clear on this. --63.25.23.85 (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How long is "prolonged" ?

Would love an expert to chime in on what constitutes "prolonged" use with respect to rebound congestion: days? weeks? months? SJFriedl (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It varies by user, age and weight but the lablels say not to use more than 3 days. Usually the rebound effect starts between 3 - 10 days. The more you use the spray the worse the rebound effect.

4.142.123.247 (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)eric[reply]

Too technical

I just added a flag requesting expert attention, because I believe this article violates guidelines such as Make technical articles accessible and explain jargon. I can't fix it, because I can't even pronounce many of these words, let alone explain them. Through a whole bunch of searching, I've gotten to a point where I believe I can improve a single sentence, from this:

The medication has sympathomimetic properties, and thus constricts the blood vessels of the nose and sinuses via activation of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors, an in turn causes a decrease in interstitial fluid accumulation (nasal edema).

to this:

The medication imitates adrenaline sympathomimetically, and thus activates alpha-2 adrenergic receptors, which constrict the blood vessels of the nose and sinuses, thereby reducing their swelling (edema).

But this may be wrong, I don't know. I'm not a scientist. 66.167.253.127 (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how about some information on how this can be addicting? the rebound congestion, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.23.214 (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed phrase from lede

I removed the following clause because it's too specific and random to be included in the lede. However, it may be placed deeper in the article.

"[Oxymetazoline] had the distinction of being the nasal decongestant among the on-board medication of Apollo 11."

I made removed this clause before I logged in. ask123 (talk) 22:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to xylometazoline

Article should include some comparison with xylometazoline, especially since lede mentions derivation from it. Relative strength, onset, duration etc. There's at least one source in Pubmed, although primary. More when I get to my desktop. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]