Talk:Reference date (United States business cycles)

Business Unassessed

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed move

It has been proposed in this section that Reference date (United States business cycles) be renamed and moved to Reference date (United States business cycles).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Reference date → reference date (United States business cycles) — Probably not the most common use of the term "reference date", should redirect to epoch (reference date). Gordon Ecker (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC) IMO reference date should redirect to epoch (reference date), as "reference date" is the plain English term for epoch. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 01:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support rename oppose retarget, instead create a disambiguation page after the rename. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]