Jump to content

Talk:Scientology and homosexuality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shibbolethink (talk | contribs) at 23:39, 16 August 2021 (→‎Requested move 8 August 2021: fix relist). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 6 December 2019.

Additional source

  • Zellner, William W. (2007). "Church of Scientology: Social Positions". Extraordinary Groups: An Examination of Unconventional Lifestyles. Worth Publishers. pp. 296–297. ISBN 0716770342. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

-- Cirt (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to get someone's attention about the external links for this page. Those links linking to "Keith Relkin" now go to a blog that has no content. Any input on how to fix this?Matipop (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scientology and sexual orientation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should the page be renamed to Scientology and homosexuality?

The article is actually about homosexuality, not sexual orientation in general. Apokrif (talk) 03:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 August 2021

Scientology and sexual orientationScientologist views on homosexuality – Per above, the article is actually about Scientologist views on homosexuality not sexual orientation in general. Also, sometimes WP:AND is necessary in article titles, but in this case it just leads to unnecessary vagueness about the article's actual topic and is inconsistent with other articles on "Religious views on ____". (t · c) buidhe 11:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Shibbolethink ( ) 18:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Advertised at WikiProject Scientology.--18:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
— Advertised at WikiProject LGBT studies.--18:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral At first I was sceptical. I assumed that the article would cover their views on bisexuality, pansexuality and asexuality as well as homosexuality, thus justifying the current broader title. After checking the article I see that none of those are even mentioned, so I guess I'm neutral on changing "sexual orientation" to "homosexuality" if there really is nothing to say on those other subjects. Replacing "Scientology and" with "Scientologist views on" does seems like a small but worthwhile improvement though. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Scientology and LGBT+ Kate Bornstein has published extensively about being in the church, having periods of practicing various sexual behavior, and doing a gender transition through it. This person talks about how the church reacted to all this. There is the potential to talk about sexuality and gender in addition to just orientation. I recognize that the article does not currently contain content for this, though, and also Bornstein's stories are dated and not a reflection of the church's changes over the decades. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer sticking with a name that accurately reflects the current scope of the article rather than preemptively retitling in anticipation of a possible expansion of scope later down the line. If someone does later want to add content about the church's views on gender identity they may find it makes more sense to do so in a separate article (depending on the degree of overlap in sourcing between the two sub-topics). Colin M (talk) 16:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]