Jump to content

User talk:Monopoly31121993(2)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sangdeboeuf (talk | contribs) at 14:26, 27 June 2021 (→‎Important notice: post-1992 American politics: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Image @German casualties

I have no problem with your edit. My father was an an American GI in the 1944-45 NW Europe campaign. I am sure he would find the image rather tame. He told me about numerous German dead that were hit by American napalm and Americans burned to death when our tanks were hit. He was a tank driver. He said you could not hold your food down for days on end because of the stench of burning flesh. Regards--Woogie10w (talk) 17:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is on Youtube Sherman tank gets hit (I can't post the link Wikipedia)only 38 seconds, there are other clips of tank explosions--Woogie10w (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Takht-i-rustam) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Takht-i-rustam, Monopoly31121993(2)!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Takht-i-rustam. Please consider adding some references for the "Cultural significance" section, as your text in that section is currently unsupported. Good luck!

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:43, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azerbaijani language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Monopoly31121993(2). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landings on Rendova, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fijian and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Monopoly31121993(2)

Thank you for creating Corruption in Norway.

User:Willbb234, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please address the issues in the tag. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 12:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement on North Azerbaijan(Arran) to be separated from whole Azerbaijan

I agree with your statement. This information has already been captured under Contemporary history history section. Hence, I deleted your edit. Thanks for cooperation. Mirhasanov (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths per capita

Would you be able and willing to create a map with deaths per capita? There is a pretty strong argument that the death numbers are much more reliable (reflecting reality) than the case numbers. (Thank you for your effort so far.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Dan, Didn't have time to get to this yesterday. I'll deal with the discussion about the existing map first and then get back to this. Thanks.Monopoly31121993(2) (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SVG version of the map

Would you please upload an svg version of File:March14 cases per-capita-COVID-19.png? Otherwise, other people cannot update it or correct any inaccuracies (perceived or real), which is pity. Thank you. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Limits on intervals and accuracy of at least one number

I very much appreciate your efforts to address several issues with the active cases per capita map for COVID-19! Could you mention both lower and upper limits with the colour legend? (Or do you prefer leaving that to me?) And the colouring for China now seems of in the opposite direction compared to previous versions: > 1 case per 100,000 inhabitants corresponds to > 10 cases per 1,000,000 inhabitants. On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic is my estimate (and data) from my calculation for China which results in approximately 7 cases per 1,000,000. What causes the difference?Redav (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Union Station (Los Angeles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Desktop improvements prototype

Hello, Monopoly31121993(2)!

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cameroon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kwa
Culture of Cameroon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kwa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Central Asian revolt of 1916 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Turkmen and Kyrgyz
Percy Sykes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Uyghur

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what "the latter" means?

Please stop your unconstructive edits at Internment. Your edits continue to introduce inaccuracies, such as a typo needing fixing, reverting a proper reference to "Nazi" camps, and your incorrect argument that the paragraph in question is not specifically about the concentration camp label being applied to extermination camps, commonly referred to as death camps. --Pinchme123 (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Qvist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonas Lie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solomon Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henderson Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World War II

Please stop attempting to edit war material into the article, and do not add unreferenced claims to it either. Your attempt to edit war that photo and it's caption in needs to be discussed on the talk page - please start a thread explaining the rationale and sources. Nick-D (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick-D, please stop mass reverting meaningful and helpful edits. I understand and appreciate if you add/remove content but simply mass reverting all edits made my users who are trying to build a better Wikipedia is not helpful.Monopoly31121993(2) (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lancaster, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with ref names

Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'error:' in the versions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka, I'm not sure what you are referring to. Could you please explain what specifically you think requires or does not require a ref tag?Monopoly31121993(2) (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm talking about adding <ref name=blabla>one content</ref> and <ref name=blabla>another content</ref> i.e. having a ref name pointing to different contents produces an error message in the reference list, like the one you can find in the revision after your above mentioned edit. Is it clear now? --Palosirkka (talk) 23:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice: post-1992 American politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Monopoly31121993(2)&oldid=1030694762"