User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. You don't seem to understand the logic of your arguments. The reliability of this source has been implicitly validated by the published work it is cited in. I placed a warning here and will report you for vandalism. I have checked the source that you cited. And I am sorry but cannot find any reliable reason for why this should be considered unreliable. By the same logic and reasoning proposed, bitcoin whitepaper would be an unreliable. MrOliveria (talk) 17:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Star Trek: Voyager

I'm doing my best to deal with the user messing at Star Trek: Voyager. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for your review. Camelcaseguy (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Please

Make a page for 13tabs. 13tabs is a search engine. I can't make page on Wikipedia help Indian G85 (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Indian G85, It doesn't meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, so I'm afraid no one could make such a page. MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Fashion design

Hello! :)

Please why did you remove my adding on the Page fashio design? I added several sources proving what I added so I don't know why you removed it^^

Have a good day! :)

--JulienSorel1965 (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

That isn't what the word 'ultimate' means. - MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Data Envelopment Analysis

You keep deleting materials which are very related to this page. For example the link I added was most useful to my PhD and I know many other students using it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SChatardary (talk • contribs) 17:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place to promote one person's work or to add links to their website. - MrOllie (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Polyvagal Theory

Hello Mr. Ollie,

I am contacting you to seek your advice on proposing a revised definition for Polyvagal Theory. In October, I had posted a revision to the current definition which you rejected and then sent the message below:

Information icon Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The current definition does not really say what polyvagal theory is, and it appears to be outdated. May I craft something more objective and run it by you for your opinion?

Thanks, Ian