User talk:RobinK

This is RobinK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Basic concepts of quantum mechanics (again!)

It doesn't look like this discussion is going any further! Perhaps it's time to try something else. Would you object if I started by proposing a merger between the basic concepts article and the intro article? (This shouldn't stop you using text from the basic concepts article to improve the timeline / history articles if you still want to do this.) Djr32 (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine. There should only be one intro. I'm not sure how you will appease the people who want math in the intro and those who don't. --Robin (talk) 21:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was quick! Hopefully we can reach a sensible compromise - but there's a reason I only said I'd propose the merger... Djr32 (talk) 21:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

collaboration?

Improving the article extremal graph theory sounds good to me. I'll start working on it a bit. Best, ExtremalGraphTheory (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we should probably figure out right from the start what we mean by "extremal graph theory". The term is slightly vague, and in its most include interpretation, is much to large for one article. I would prefer being on the restrictive side of the definition. ExtremalGraphTheory (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, let us start the discussion on the talk page of the article, so that other interested editors may also join in. --Robin (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]