Jump to content

User talk:Top Jim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HARRYMAGIC (talk | contribs) at 15:39, 19 October 2010 (→‎Article Harsh Vardhan Jain: ~~~~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

thanks for jumping in

at Bainbridge Bunting. I just dashed it off and now am off to work and was worried that some wikizealot would appear and raise a fuss. Your category will help prevent that. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help, thanks. Top Jim (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And now I see that you have done a lot more. Life is good.Carptrash (talk) 15:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sarwari qadri

i dont understand really what is gmrdsardar intention. firstly they deleted the old article without any users permission and trying to show others are wrong. but in my opinion, if they think they are true they should create a separate article with proofs of supporting documents instaed they dont have any rights to delete others article without any permission and discussions as per wikipedia policy. i also want to remind gmrdsardar that, just by creating two pages of html websites will not show them the right cause. hope i haven't shown any conflict of personnel interest just want to justify to someone that dont underestimate others.

and requesting wiki team to approve the old article which was in the name of sarwari qadri.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shajahanwiki125 (talkcontribs)

I don't understand: which article do you think should not have been deleted? Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Eric Shinn; sorry I didn't read that closer! Thanks for tagging with db-attack. — Timneu22 · talk 10:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's probably a joke page rather than an attack page, but I like to err on the side of caution to avoid turning Wikipedia into a steaming pile of libel. Top Jim (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Boler

Thanks for the cat add on Stephen Boler. BrainyBabe (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! Top Jim (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflagration

Hey Top Jim, Please delete that Great Conflagration article. My younger brother created an account and thought that would be funny. It's a joke article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsanders1976 (talkcontribs) 15:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 15:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DellaTech

Regarding the recent deletion tag placed on the article DellaTech, I believe this should not be deleted, as it is currently useful to a number of customers, locals, and residents across the UK. It contains information about a vital company (such as Geek Squad) that would be of interest to many. The company is going to be expanding across Europe in the near future, and as such, requires information such as source, location and history which is something irrelevant to put on the website. Please consider your choice. Thank you. Jamie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Solidsnake1211 (talkcontribs) 15:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution, but the article's been nominated for deletion on the grounds of WP:Notability. There's zero assertion of notability in the article. Please see also WP:ITSUSEFUL, and WP:Conflict of interest: if your company is notable, then please wait for someone else to write about it. As I wrote on your talk page, please don't remove the speedy tag yourself: if it's been nominated in error, then an admin will remove it. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion test page

Sorry, i'm italian and I copied the wrong url. --Genuzzu (talk) 13:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Top Jim (talk) 13:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i need help editing my page, can you proof read it for me and tell me what i need to do to make it wiki worthy...thanks

HI Can youhelp me edit my page please Im having trouble editing it. Can you tell me if it is ok the content?? thank you its Mohamed Yehia Zakaria

thanks sirAnyz 16:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azny4644 (talkcontribs)

Hello Azny4644, it's looking much better now. I've done some more editing on it too: all it needs now is some more references. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 22:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ok Thank you Jim, im having touble with citations.. can you give me an example?i m having touble editing it on the page im not sure how o do it.. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azny4644 (talkcontribs) 20:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, you can see some examples at WP:CITEFOOT. There's also one in that M. Y. Zakaria article already at Mohamed Yehia Zakaria#Education and career, at the end of the sentence "...had its highest ever net profit of 17 AED million." Ask if you have any more questions. Top Jim (talk) 22:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dave's One Night Stand

Hi Jim,

I received your note about speedy deletition of the Dave's One Night Stand page I recently created.

Could you please advise how I can avoid this happening? I have seen several articles about TV shows where the format is not too disimilar. I understand this could be preceived as an advert so any advice greatly appreciated

Thanks

Westerveld Westerveld (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Westerveld, WP:SPAM is a good place to start. If you're in doubt, you could always create a draft version in a userspace draft, and then ask some experienced editors to take a look at it before you copy it into the main article space. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 22:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent report to WP:UAA, please see this comment from the user; I think their response should satisfy any concerns you might have with the potentially offensive meaning of "long dong". GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 16:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's true. :-) Sorry for the misunderstanding. Top Jim (talk) 22:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, easy mistake to make (I understood your concern though you didn't clarify the report, after all). For ambiguous names like this which might be an obscenity but could be something else though, it's usually best to discuss it with the user first and take it to WP:RFCN if they ignore your message or decline to explain. The easiest wayt to do that is with {{uw-username}}. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will do next time, thanks. Top Jim (talk) 22:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portfolio

i just created Almerindo Portfolio. was wondering how you jumped on it so fast to make some much appreciated improvements? thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccirulli (talkcontribs) 07:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome! Thanks for the excellent article. Top Jim (talk) 07:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

I have a question: I put up an aritcle about Peter Bruner, who was a slave born in Kentucky in 1845. In the article, I talked about his life and all the experiences he went through as a slave, later as a soldier, and finally as a free man who built a wonderful life for himself and family, despite all odds being against him. Then I got a message saying it was to be speedily deleted becuase the subject of the article (Peter Bruner) was not historically significant. My question is...why? Lindsay Lohan has a multiple paged article, but the past slaves of our country are not considered "historically significant" enough to simply have a Wikipedia article written about them? I am confused by your reasoning and if you could enlighten me, I would much appreciate it.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aclymer1339 (talkcontribs) 14:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Take a look at WP:GNG for an indication of criteria which articles need to meet to be considered notable enough for inclusion. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 14:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are tons of articles on Wikipedia that ought to a lot bigger than the Lindsey Lohan one. Take a look at Category:Articles to be expanded and Category:American slaves, and please dive in and help. If you know a lot about a certain subject, then please join up with one of the many Wikipedia:Wikiprojects, all of which are very keen to get your help expanding their articles. Please don't take it personally that the subject of the article you created wasn't judged to be notable enough: it's not a reflection on you or your editing abilities. Thanks in advance for your help. Top Jim (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Ann

...or whoever... I don't think I've seen as unreadably dense a bit of text in years! Keep up the good work. Peridon (talk) 10:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, thank you. Top Jim (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim

I want to create a page on employee performance. There is no page about it, and i want to add knowledge.

Please don't attempt do delete my page even before i have created it. Thanks :) Hoping for your cooperation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativaindia (talkcontribs) 13:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please add referenced information to the existing article: there's no need to create a separate one yet, and what you've added so far is an essay with a lot of Original research in it. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 13:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I would add referenced material now. Please give me time to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativaindia (talkcontribs) 13:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me whats wrong in my way of proceeding? Please. It would be a great help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativaindia (talkcontribs) 13:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong is that despite my warning you four times not to remove the speedy template from the article you created, you removed it a fifth time with this edit. Then you pasted your unreferenced promotional screed over a perfectly good article with this edit. If you don't stop vandalizing pages, you're going to get blocked from editing by an admin. Top Jim (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio vs spam

Sorry about the EC. Anyway, copyvio is more serios that spam even :) --Kudpung (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I'm in the frozen foods aisle at the supermarket, and can't decide between two flavors of ice cream, I nearly always settle the dilemma by choosing both. :-) 13:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

QA About delete

Hi Jim , I am technology journalist and I'm new at wiki policy and rules. some of the info that i did was based on other changes that i have found in other places ,what was wrong with what I did? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrTheNewWay (talkcontribs) 20:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up that section in Near Field Communication, and restored the entry about Digimo running the trial in Israel: all it needs now is a reference from a WP:Reliable source. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article SUMObot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub with very little context.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: I tagged it for maintenance, but there's nothing online supporting notability. Thanks for copying me. Top Jim (talk) 05:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories at Central Luxury House

Top Jim, thanks for adding categories to Central Luxury House. If you're feeling generous could you also mark it "patrolled" at Special:NewPages? I'd appreciate it. Hope you're doing well. Saebvn (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, done. Interesting article BTW, I'd never heard of that. It would be a good idea to add references from other sources though. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 20:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have spent part of this afternoon, when I'm supposed to be working, looking for other articles. Looks like the satellite images were taken from an individual project where a journalist or researcher poured over Google Earth images to find images of the elites' residences and reeducation camps, prison camps, etc. The problem is that so little is known about the DPRK that images and explanations are hard to come by. Will keep looking. Thanks. Saebvn (talk) 20:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dialog Axiata

Apologize if the content sounds as if it's advertising motivated. However it's not. In fact the turn around of Dialog from Performing to Non-performing and then Performing again is an important case study for Sri Lankan enterprises. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milindat (talkcontribs) 07:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding case studies about the company is fine, but you'll need WP:Reliable, WP:Secondary references to support that, and all of your edits to the article so far have been highly WP:PROMO. Please have a read of WP:SPAM: Wikipedia is not the place to post marketing for your company. Thank you, Top Jim (talk) 07:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helping hand. My first literary stub. Anthony (talk) 18:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, thank you. Another one of Zola's works I still haven't read yet... Top Jim (talk) 18:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Librivox recording is, unlike many of their efforts, quite well read, if you like talking books. Anthony (talk) 19:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had never heard of Librivox, thank you! I'm listening to it now. Much obliged. Top Jim (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Top Jim. You're welcome. I listen to them when I'm too busy or tired to read. Do you think I should move this to its French title (L'Inondation), it having been authored in French? Anthony (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes that's a good idea, as the other novels in Category:Novels by Émile Zola are all in the original French. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers. Anthony (talk) 17:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will o'the Wind

I've changed your csd vandalism to a prod blp. He does seems to exist and appear on Stern's show. (I feel glad I live in the UK and have no TV anyway...) Peridon (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Egad. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 19:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Hi Jim,

I have uploaded a new page but would like to change my username as it conflicts with the article!

Can you please give instructions of how I do so?—Preceding unsigned comment added by EllipseUK (talkcontribs)

Hello, you can find info on how to do this at WP:Changing username. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim,

I've changed my username now!

When does it come into action as I would like to publish the 'Group Risk Scheme' page and another one

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by EllipseUK (talkcontribs) 15:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A1

Hi there Jim. I saw you tagged Edward anthony mason cullen for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A1. However, since there was sufficient context to identify the subject, this was not an apprioate criterion. I have instead deleted the page under WP:CSD#A10. Please make sure you review the WP:CSD, to help avoid making errors in tagging in the future. Cheers, and keep up the NPP work :), - Kingpin13 (talk) 07:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But I'm so out of touch with TV culture that I'd never heard of Edward Cullen, and assumed from the editor's previous edits that it was some sort of joke or disparagement of an acquaintance. Next time I'll be more thorough. :-)

Thanks

Good Day Top Jim,

Thx for your warm Welcome. Thank you also for the Help links, I have read them and made some improvements to the article.

Would be glad to read back from you.

Many Thanks Barcelona2010 (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your contributions. The new references look good - please ask if I can be of any more help with the article. Top Jim (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Top Jim,

thank you very much for your response. What changes should be done at "External Links" to answer the red question mark? Or could you remove the question mark?

Many Thanks again! Barcelona2010 (talk) 12:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that tag, it looks done to me. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 12:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reply from Fahamid (talk) 09:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

hey, how r u ? Hope fine. I just have written that article, coz i live in that district. I have all the info abt that clg. Remember one thing . I am not a fake person.

Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Please note that you shouldn't sign your contributions in an article itself, but do please continue to sign your additions to talk pages. Top Jim (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove wikify=October 2010 from Dialog Axiata

Hi, Top Jim. I have gone through the article and wiki-fied most of the text. Appreciate if you could go through the article and if there aren't any more, to remove the wikifiy tag. Thanks! :) Milindat (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fasthosts page

Hi Top Jim,

My first wiki entry has been flagged up due to Conflict of Interest. I feel the article has been written by a neutral point of view after reviewing other wikipedia pages such as United Internet, 1and1 and heart internet. Please let me know what we specific elements of the article you feel are in breach of wikipedioa terms and I will correct those.

All the best, --Fhsupport (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions, but I would strongly recommend that you not edit an article about your company: please see WP:COI. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Top Jim, The page was not created for any promotional purposes, solely to give a neutral viewpoint of one of the UK's web hosting companies. Do you know if wikipedia will allow this page to stay online?

Thanks --Fhsupport (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be nominating it for deletion, as there's nothing promotional about it. There was an AFD discussion on this article before at WP:Articles for deletion/Fasthosts, but that was 4 years ago, and in my opinion there wasn't a strong case for deleting it even then. Another editor might disagree though - who knows. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Top Jim --Fhsupport (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Richard Barker & Nick Drake

Dear Top Jim,

The creation of a page for the author CRB is justified and the links verify the claims made therein. Indeed, a downloadable PDF of the first part of Barker's collection 'Tenebrous Tales' proves that it includes a 50pp novella based upon the life and death of Nick Drake. Furthermore, I can furnish you with emails between the author and Drake's former manager Joe Boyd which further prove the existence of the book and tale.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need any further clarification. This is the first article I have created and I studied other Wikipedia articles and tutorials very carefully before creating it. Thanks in advance for any tips or pointers you can supply.

(Curemaniac (talk) 18:07, 14 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Curemaniac, and thanks for your contribution. The article doesn't seem to assert notability per WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Am I missing something? If there is more to tell about the man, then please let me know and I'd be happy to help you with adding references etc. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Top Jim:

The author published & edited two award-nominated collections by the highly notable Reggie Oliver, and reviews for his own short stories have been very praiseworthy (citations from his Wikipedia peers can be obtained, but probably not until after the weekend). His fictionalization of Nick Drake is the first of its kind and has been especially lauded and involved consultation with the legendary music producer Joe Boyd. The BBC's Head of Radio Drama was planning to produce a dramatization of one of Barker's stories when an unexpected shake-up led to the dropping of the project at the last moment. Barker has also completed a mainstream work of Dystopian fiction which is about to be placed with a high profile London publishing house. He is also working-up the abandoned radio-play into a screenplay. Hope this helps. PS. Several inferior authors and publishers have Wikipedia entries. Please could you what the precise criteria for inclusion is? Thanks in advance! (Curemaniac (talk) 20:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

As noted above, the relevant guidelines can be found at WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO or WP:GNG, but they're not precise. By which high profile London publishing house is his work about to be published? Have you got references supporting that? Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is unprofessional to announce the name of the publisher until contracts have been signed; however, there is no reference to this novel in the Wiki entry! In the meantime, I have added inline citations to the article which should go some way to allaying your fears that this is a valid article. All of the internal references - to books published by the author and playwright Reggie Oliver, to proof that Barker has authored numerous stories as well as a collection of his work - validates the claims made in the article. Indeed, many other lesser authors have been claiming that some vague, unnamed publisher is about to publish their next book for years, but nothing ever materialises. No such claims are made in this article. As soon as a new project has been commissioned or completed, only then will the article make reference to it. Hope this helps you lift the warnings on the article but please feel free to contact me direct and I can copy you (for examples) between the author and Joe Boyd proving (for example) the claims made about the Nick Drake tale. Thanks! (Curemaniac (talk) 21:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Are you Christopher Richard Barker? You seem to have unreleased information on his career: if you are connected with him then please have a read of WP:Conflict of interest and edit with caution to ensure a WP:Neutral point of view. I'm afraid nothing you've mentioned so far appears to support notability for Barker per the notability criteria I mentioned above, so I'm going to propose it for deletion. If you can supply further information supporting the article's suitability for inclusion then the waiting period should give you time enough to add it. Regarding other Wikipedia articles on authors whom you regard as lesser or inferior, please have a read of WP:OTHERSTUFF. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not Barker. Who are you in 'real' life?

If you propose to delete this article then presumably you will be equally interested in deleting the dozens / hundreds of other articles by equally obscure or less known individuals that I have chanced across?

I am sorry, but this seems to be quite a malicious proposal of yours. Barker was instrumental in helping to launch the literary career of Reggie Oliver; he was worked with many well-known third parties; and his debut collection has received excellent reviews. All of this has been proven by valid citations. It would appear to border on victimization.

Please could you advise who I should complain to? I would like to escalate this to a higher level in addition to providing you with a long list of less worthy Wiki articles.

(Curemaniac (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

You can start by making your case for why the article shouldn't be deleted at the AFD discussion, as I've noted on your talk page. You are also most welcome to point out articles to me that don't meet Wikipedia criteria for inclusion: I spend a lot of time clearing them out. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 21:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Re: George Hopkins

Thank you for all your editing! I am new. How do I address the "citations for verification"/ I thought the links and references where okay? I also sent photos, magazine covers and articles to [email protected]?! I truly appreciate your help. Randys1girl Randys1girl (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for the article. The problem at the moment is that it says a great deal about Mr. Hopkins, but most of this is uncited. I'd recommend you start by having a read of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, to get to know how best to write a biography article. There doesn't seem to be anything contentious in there, but there's a lot about his achievements that for Wikipedia:Verifiability do need some cites. I'll try to look online, and maybe you could find some press clippings online. One last thing: since you are connected with him by family, it's important that you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and make sure that you're careful to write as objectively as possible about him. That's not always easy, but it can be done. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 08:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My father and I have been estranged for years and just got back in touch. All this is from verifiable articles, books or people who worked with him. I did send articles and photos of him with William Morris agency on them to the photo submission email. There is nothing online besides what I have noted. I am collecting articles and more photos to submit further evidence of his accomplishments. I promise you it is all true and much more. Just want to make sure I have the documentation before submitting the rest. Again, thank you, really appreciated. Is there some way to have someone else who knows Wikipedia rules and guidelines write articles? My facebook page has a lot of photos of him from work. I am doing my best to create a chronology of his work and document it. Randys1girl (talk) 08:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What specific sort of help are you looking for? I'm quite happy to help you with the references if you like. You say you sent photos to Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission: have you had a response yet? If the photos are already now uploaded, and any unanswered questions over ownership and copyright etc. have been sorted out, then I can help you get the photos into the article. Top Jim (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No response yet, and I am waiting for more photos and articles to support that I should have very soon. I wrote in the email that I sent the photos to the declaration of consent, I see that I need to send that to a different email and will do that this morning.Randys1girl (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


list of best selling artists in asia

thank you for warning, i'll gonna improve the article as soon as i can..Russart_1999 (talk) 15:50 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Help with Maroubra Surfers Church page

Hi Top Jim. Thank you for your offer of help. I would be most grateful to have some help as I am not quite sure what is required of me. It is a very kind offer and I would love to take you up on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samgareth (talkcontribs) 03:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited it for WP:Neutral point of view. It's not quite clear yet how notable it is per WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 09:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for all your help Top Jim. Is there any way to demonstrate it's notability? Anything I can help you with? Take care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samgareth (talkcontribs) 00:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's needed is coverage of the group from WP:Reliable, independent, WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources. If you can find some of those, I'd be happy to help you some more with the formatting. Any more questions, please ask away. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CCL Label Decorative Sleeves page.

I recently created the CCL Label Decorative Sleeves page. Unfortunately it seems I was a little eager, and didn’t get yourself or one of your colleagues to proofread my article. Also there are neutrality warnings on the page. I do in fact work for the company the article is about, however I’ve done my upmost to put just the facts about the business and mainly focused on the history of the company. I hope this meets with your approval. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aseamons (talkcontribs) 09:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, you have tried to keep it objective, and the company does appear to be notable in its market independently of its parent company, so I've done a bit more editing for WP:NPOV and removed the tags. Thanks for the article. Top Jim (talk) 09:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Top Jim. I've removed the {{db-spam}} from this article, as I think the person in question is notable enough for Wikipedia and the article is fixable. I've removed the unreferenced content and I notified the creator on the impropriety of advertising here on Wikipedia. Feel free to take the article to AfD if you disagree with my action. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No it's fine now, thanks for the cleanup. Top Jim (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're quick! Thanks,  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That's a great article by the way. Top Jim (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Swagga Nicholas */

This page is a representation of a music producer that has just achieved success. All the links on the site are valid and googling this artist provides just short of 400,000 hits. (http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&expIds=17259,17291,23756,24878,26637,26692,27023,27151&xhr=t&q=christopher+swagga+nicholas&cp=26&pf=p&sclient=psy&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=christopher+swagga+nicholas&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=7618285d7109e1b3)

There aren't many artists from where he lives and so he is considered to be somewhat influential to the area.

Any help would be gladly appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matchboxboy (talkcontribs) 22:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for contributing. Quantity of Google hits isn't what makes an artist notable, it's quality and depth of coverage. Please have a read of WP:MUSICBIO for more info on the kind of coverage I'm talking about. The hits I can see all seem to be press releases. He might well be notable one day, but doesn't seem to be notable yet. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Los Hermanos Colon

Hi Jim Please help I work with Los Hermanos Colon and I was the one that wrote their Biography I was trying to give Wikipedia some reliable information about Los Hermanos Colon I am not Violating the Copywrite because I wrote the Bio and because I work with them would you like me to post the bio with the Los Hermanos Colon account? I don't know what page to put so you can check the bio in a public site please help thank you Jim...Gladys—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gina2005 (talkcontribs)

Hello, and thanks for your contribution. As I noted on the article's talk page, you need to either write the article on your own words, or follow the instructions at WP:IOWN to sort out the potential copyright infringement. Wikipedia can't simply take anyone's word for it that they're the person who wrote the page, it has to be confirmed for legal reasons. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 09:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is been thanking you in doing relevent help for references etc in the Article. As some more corrections are been done now, in order as per your requiremnts. RegardsHARRYMAGIC (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, nothing has changed apart from you removing the maintenance tags and correcting some punctuation here and there. Please fix the problem before removing the maintenance tags, thanks. Top Jim (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kindy see the article before deletion as that was correct by all means and please contact User:Deb as a lot of guidance was given for references etc. Once kindy review the article deleted today. ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]