Jump to content

User talk:Amaekuma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nnadigoodluck (talk | contribs) at 00:51, 20 December 2022 (Notification: listing of Cross Okonkwo at WP:Articles for deletion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omah Lay (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll do that. Amaekuma (talk) 11:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

@curbon7

Help me review this one Attih Soul. Thanks Amaekuma (talk) 11:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Amaekuma! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Curbon7 (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate Amaekuma (talk) 11:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omah Lay (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources all point to WP:TOOSOON, removing all the peacock statements isn’t the problem, the lack of notability as of now is, Furthermore read WP:COI & WP:PAID. Please do not submit this again anytime soon.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attih Soul moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Attih Soul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Attih Soul has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Attih Soul. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attih Soul (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Attih Soul

Hello, Amaekuma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Attih Soul".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of people from Ebonyi State

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Ebonyi State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are not non-notable? I intend creating those pages Amaekuma (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Ebonyi State. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
The article clearly states ♦♦♦ Only add a person to this list if they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia ♦♦♦, so don't add them until their articles have been accepted - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Information icon Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Adamu Garba II. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for reaching out to me.

Cited in the draft are reliable third party sources ranging from BBC to many other reputable Nigerian media houses. If you find the tone of the draft bias, it's obviously because Adamu is a controversial character and that isn't my fault. Those are their words not mine. Amaekuma (talk) 11:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

Hi - I see you've asked a number of users to be your mentor. You would be better off asking at the Teahouse or one of the active users listed Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area rather than targetting users at random. Sorry, but I don't have the time or level of involvement to help you at present, though I wish you luck in finding someone who can. — Voice of Clam 08:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Amaekuma (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attih Soul moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Attih Soul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidacae: Am I not supposed to have 10 minutes to put the opening of my article together before you start making all these moves according to wikipedia rules? Amaekuma (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Attih Soul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attih Soul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attih Soul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mooonswimmer 15:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cross (BBNaija), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South African.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attih Soul moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Attih Soul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 16:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Amaekuma

Thank you for creating Cross (BBNaija).

User:Zippybonzo, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Fabulous Article, I reviewed it as you requested on my UTP, thanks for creating it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zippybonzo}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

| Zippybonzo | Talk | 14:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Zippybonzo:. Thanks for your encouraging words. You're appreciated! Amaekuma (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ugo Monye (fashion designer)

Hello, Amaekuma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ugo Monye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks Amaekuma (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks Amaekuma (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amaekuma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 105.112.190.96. This is the second time I am getting caught in an open proxy block. Can I get an exception because I'm not involved in what's causing the block Amaekuma (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The method for requesting IP Block Exemption in this instance is documented at WP:IPECPROXY. The IP in question appears to be connected to a peer-to-peer vpn network. SQLQuery Me! 21:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Project K (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please do not restore unsourced info. The WP:BURDEN is on you to make sure it's verifiable, even if you were simply reverting an edit. Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ab207:, I 'undid' vandalism on the page, so I don't understand what you mean. Amaekuma (talk) 06:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend reading WP:VANDALISM: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." The IP was simply removing unsourced character names in good faith, so it is far from being called "vandalism." Reverting such an edit doesn't improve the encyclopedia, it only worsens by perpetuating the unsourced content present in the article. Hope you understand. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even though what you're typing here to me makes no sense whatsoever, I acknowledge you. Bye. Amaekuma (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reversed the edit because an anonymous user was removing content so I reversed it to the last known good edit.

Did the anonymous user include citation to the edit he deleted? An anonymous user can't just remove information that has been on Wikipedia without providing citation.

I stand by what I did because it's the right thing. @Ab207:.


Amaekuma (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are free to remove unverifiable information from the encyclopedia. Also, how can anyone logically provide a citation to remove the information? The burden of proof lies on those who adds/restores the material, NOT the one who removes. Unsourced content can never be the "last known good edit."
You could say that the IP didn't explain their removal in edit summary but even you didn't give an edit summary which could have helped others in judging the situation. So kindly try to use edit summaries when reverting other's edits. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: I don't need to give an edit summary when reversing vandalism using the undo button, that is the rule.

I acknowledge you for reaching out, and I don't mean to sound rude however this conversation is done because it isn't heading anywhere.

Amaekuma (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boma Akpore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Post.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amaekuma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 105.112.112.167. This thing keeps happening. Can't I get an IP block exemption. Amaekuma (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have edited successfully since making this request. If you would like to request an IP block exemption, please contact a checkuser by following the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Oprah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not restore trivial information to BLPs, and please indicate, in an edit summary, what you are doing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drmies. Calling my edit disruptive is overreacting and far-reaching.
You made an edit where you removed well sourced information about her personal life calling them "trivial". You can't describe things about someone's personal life as "trivial", especially since everyone has different tastes and what is important to one person might not be important to another. Also, personal life subsection is meant to contain more informal and casual information than maybe a career subsection. That is my thought process. And I don't believe you know everything. Amaekuma (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unexplained reinsertion of challenged material is disruptive--it's really quite simple. And no, "personal life" still needs to be encyclopedic, sourced, and relevant. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Drmies, I just have the feeling that you have the 'need' to be right everytime. The material you removed has maybe six citations and you still call it unsourced? But hey, do whatever pleases you. Have a nice day. Amaekuma (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time on Wikipedia

As a Nigerian editor, I am happy to meet and interact with a fellow Nigerian editor on Wikipedia. Charlesvet88 (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you too Charlesvet88 Amaekuma (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice - sanctions apply to biographies

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Hipal (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paul O

Hello, Amaekuma,

Thank you for creating Paul O.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Any webpage with click bait adverts isn’t what I would call reliable, please do add some more accurate sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zippybonzo}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 06:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I am learning everyday. Thanks @Zippybonzo: Amaekuma (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of candidates in the 2023 Nigerian general elections moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of candidates in the 2023 Nigerian general elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PS: What’s the essence of this list though? It doesn't look encyclopaedic. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans Hello. I don't mean to be rude or come across as abrasive, however I'm data analyst and I know for a fact that one of the best sources of properly vetted data is getting data that is generated by government. That's why I cited the official website of INEC; who are the government department in charge of elections in Nigeria.

However, if you need me to put in other third party sources on the page, I can. I already put one third party source but they all got their data from the INEC source and it's just going to be a repetition. Amaekuma (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amaekuma, that’s not the point. This list is already in 2023 Nigerian presidential election. It’s already there. The list—-to me—-does not seem to be encyclopaedic. Are there list of this for the presidential election of other countries? Best, Reading Beans (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly Reading Beans, you missed the whole point. The idea of this is for the general elections (presidential, guber, senate) and what you're showing me is for just the presidential elections. I intend to keep expanding the list. Your message came in by 4AM local time (I was sleeping so I wasn't editing). Amaekuma (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


These are just two similar links. One is presidential and one is general. Bye. PS if you wanna help Wikipedia improve, help by assisting me work on the page. Though you aren't obligated to, that's a nice place to start

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidates_in_the_2016_Philippine_presidential_election

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidates_in_the_2008_New_Zealand_general_election_by_electorate

Reading Beans

Nomination of Obinna Nwosu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obinna Nwosu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obinna Nwosu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neo Mobor Akpofure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neo Mobor Akpofure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Mobor Akpofure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Nnadigoodluck███ 23:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kim Oprah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Oprah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Oprah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Nnadigoodluck███ 23:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cross Okonkwo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cross Okonkwo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross Okonkwo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Nnadigoodluck███ 00:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amaekuma&oldid=1128413890"