User talk:Bharatveer

Welcome!

Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; Archive9 :Till Feb 29th 2008; Archive10 :Till April 15th 2008;

Robert P. Goldman says Ramayana was written 6,000 B.C.?

I didn't delete a citation. I moved it and changed it to its original, correct form (750 to 500 BC.) What it was is that somebody changed 750 to 500 BC to 6,000 without changing the citation, which actually says 750 to 500 BC. David G Brault (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindu`s stand on China should be mentioned and it`s anti dalai -lama stand should also be made known to readers in the criticism section in a suitable way(the whole article is junk anyway).However to cite readers editor to mention that The Hindu wished to take a legal action is naive..The article cited only tells that there is a system in the country to deal with mere offensive and abusive mails

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Georgearunn" Georgearunn (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 05:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

at the onset let me appreciate you for the interest shown in wikifying the article on 'KERALA KALAMANDALAM'. however, i would like to bring to ur attn a few things. u have mentioned, among other things, that it was the regulations of the colonial authorities on the temple administration that led to kathakali, koodiyattam, and mohiniyattam, falling in to disrepute. well, i would like to think that the temple authorities, who would invariably have been feudals chieftains, were solely responsible for that scenario and it had nothing to do with colonialism.

also, i strongly believe that the original compiler intended to mention that MOHINIYATTOM (and only mohiniyattom) had fallen in to disrepute becoz of the stigma attached to it of being the dance form of DEVADASIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.130.121.43 (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]