User talk:Brutonlegend

Welcome! Hello, Brutonlegend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The chronology of ezra 7, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jarkeld (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Chronology of Ezra 7

The article The Chronology of Ezra 7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book; no evidence it meets the inclusion standard WP:NBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Template:Do not delete Tim Song (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Brutonlegend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Blocking administrator: blocking administrator (talk)

Reviewing administrator: Brutonlegend (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason:

Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. I dont feel that I have actually dealt with any individual that has imputed this status on me in a biased fashion or in a way that should impute thier block status upon myself. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.Brutonlegend (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. I dont feel that I have actually dealt with any individual that has imputed this status on me in a biased fashion or in a way that should impute thier block status upon myself. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.Brutonlegend (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. I dont feel that I have actually dealt with any individual that has imputed this status on me in a biased fashion or in a way that should impute thier block status upon myself. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.Brutonlegend (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}

[reply]

Brutonlegend (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]