Jump to content

User talk:CJ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tavix (talk | contribs) at 14:12, 27 June 2019 (Notification: listing of Portal:Newcastle at redirects for discussion. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

cj is retired. sorta.
User:CJ
User:CJ/Userdex
:commons:User:CJ/Gallery
User:CJ/Sandpit
User:CJ/Notes
User_talk:CJ
Home Users Gallery Sandpit To-do Talk
replies
  • If you have posted your comment correctly, know that I will read it, generally within a weeks time.
  • I will usually always respond to your comment on my talkpage. Sometimes I may crosspost to your talkpage.
  • Occasionally, I may not respond — understand this is not because I have not read your comment nor is it a personal slight
archives
This talk page is automatically archived. Any sections older than 6 days are automatically archived to Archive 19. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Index
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
7 |8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2005 French riots/Archives, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:2005 French riots/Archives and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:2005 French riots/Archives during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect P:H. Since you had some involvement with the P:H redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Towns of Gippsland

Template:Towns of Gippsland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:John Rundle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Darwin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Darwin. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Darwin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Newcastle listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Newcastle. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Newcastle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]