If you have posted your comment correctly, know that I will read it, generally within a weeks time.
I will usually always respond to your comment on my talkpage. Sometimes I may crosspost to your talkpage.
Occasionally, I may not respond — understand this is not because I have not read your comment nor is it a personal slight
archives
This talk page is automatically archived. Any sections older than 6 days are automatically archived to Archive 19. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adelaide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenside Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Portal:Victoria, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Victoria and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Victoria during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nemo20:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.