User talk:CiaPan

User talk:CiaPan archives:

arch1 (Jun 2005 – Mar 2016)

arch2 (May 2016 – Jan 2020)

current

Some stroopwafels for you!

Just... enjoy - DVdm (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Mmmm, yummy! Thank you, DVdm! It made me happy that you gave me a rational number of them. They'll be a perfect cure for some recent irrational proposals. CiaPan (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Merge Sort article pseudo code examples rewritten in complicated fashion, I reverted back to prior state

A user with no Wiki account made major changes to the pseudocode examples, making them much more complicated. I reverted the pseudocode examples back to a prior state and suggested that user get a Wiki account. Rcgldr (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Dear Ciapan

wishing more happiness for you.I need your help, Notability, Advertisement, Manual of style, these are the three templates has been tagged by you ,I respect all . </ref>Notability[1]</ref> is link where you can see and verify the work for crippling problem like fistula,fissure,Piles and lipoma as well with own innovative techniques (2)for advertisment template i must say Dear wikipedia always require online verifiable sources that is why links has been added. (3) Manual of style--help is required to change. pls help if more editing is needed. Heartiest REGARDS Sarvmangal (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Portrait of Schnirelman

Just in case: a note from Commons:File talk:Шнірельман Лев Генріхович..jpg, related to Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Шнірельман Лев Генріхович..jpg, preserving here

=== Free status ===

If this image is ever decided to be non-free, please place a request at w:WP:REFUND to undelete this item (w:File:Schnirelman.jpg) for fair use. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

CiaPan (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Ben Dunk Domestic section reverted by CiaPan on March 4 2020

Hello CiaPan, Could you please tell me issue in my "edit" revision for the Ben Dunk page on March 4th 2020? I am new here, just wanted to learn from my mistakes. Also I am not sure if this is the right place to talk. If I am again on wrong page please let me know the process please. Thank you Ayaz.ashraf (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Ayaz

Thank you very much for explaining the Special:Diff/943880673. Your answer has cleared the confusion. Ayaz.ashraf (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Notice of ANI that mentions you in passing

Greetings, FYI I filed a request at WP:ANI titled "CIR-based community-imposed site ban re: RTG". In providing a basis for my request I mentioned you and your prior dealings with this editor. Your input at ANI is optional, i.e., invited but not specifically requested. Thanks for reading. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

You are now a pending changes reviewer!

Hi CiaPan! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tools. Instead of having you formally request the rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Please keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
• A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page - I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Oshwah! I've been given this right in pl-wiki in 2008 but didn't use it too often. I hope en-wiki rules do not differ much, so I won't have to learn too much now.

I used to patrol Recent changed at pl-wiki some time ago, but stopped it. I do not regularly look at RC at en-wiki, either. However, I watch WP:Reference Desk and Help desk, also the Teahouse and some sections of Village pump, so I find many questions and complaints there, which often lead me to fixing (and sometimes to reverting) faulty edits.

Sometimes I also jump into Category:Pages with* or Category:Articles with* to fix references, citations etc. and quite a big part of them turn out to result from disruptive edits. I think cleaning them up may look like I am an active RC patroller. :)

Meanwhile, I did my first change accept already It was a simple but unformatted addition Special:Diff/988369182 in Ciara Bravo, which I also edited to fit the article structure. Thanks, once again, and happy editing! --CiaPan (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

No problem! Well deserved! Yeah, it shouldn't be too bad. You just review and accept good-faith edits, and reject bad-faith edits, etc. You'll get used to it quick, but if you run into any questions, you know where to find me. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

area of a circle

Hi! I'm sorry about yesterday. It took me a while to realize, that I can find the reasons for revert in my contributions section. I understand your decisions, and tagged my article with {cn}. I hope, that helps, and retry later.Gmac4247 (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Alas, nope, Gmac4247. That will not help, neither now nor later. Your wanted addition is your original research, so publishing of it here, at Wikipedia, would be contrary to WP:OR policy. Apart from that it is based on an unjustified claim, so it is actually not a proof, and it ends contrary to mathematical result, well-known for about thirty eight centuries. As such its chance to be accepted equals precisely zero. --CiaPan (talk) 00:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

New message from IN

Hello, CiaPan. You have new messages at IN's talk page.
Message added 07:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Alcremie (talk) 07:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi CiaPan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Using a link to a redirect back to the referring page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello from Wlod (long time no see)

Napisz do mnie, jeżeli masz czas i ochotę, na adres (redacted) -- mam ograniczone warunki, email byłby najlepszy.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Włodek Wlod (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For the image that you provided on the Four Color Theorem - it's beautiful! Integral Python click here to argue with me 21:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, IntegralPython! I really appreciate the barnstar, it means a lot for me. It's very encouraging to see my activity here serves the project well. Anyway, I must admit that it was not solely my work. The original idea, as well as the first ugly raster sketch (you can see it HERE) were mine, but I have no necessary skills or even appropriate tools to prepare such nice SVG drawings. So I made a request at Commons:Illustration workshop (oldid:539642426, section Please redraw my 4CT_Inadequacy_Explanation.png in SVG), and Mrmw created the final image you can see in the article now (THIS one).

So I want to share your special thanks with Mrmw, too: Good Job! --CiaPan (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely! Big thanks to both of you _{Integral Python} ^{click here to argue with me} 19:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lamina (anatomy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamina cribrosa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

A note for readers, not for the author (bot):
that was intentional – I 've added a deeper lever of disambiguation to Lamina → Lamina (anatomy). --CiaPan (talk) 07:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for telling me about templates and teahouses. SilverMatsu (talk) 00:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, SilverMatsu, for the barnstar. I'm really happy to see my hints make your life of Wikipedian easier and more interesting. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. We all were beginners some day, and we all learn. I strongly believe there is no person who knows everything! CiaPan (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Quicksort worst case

Hi CiaPan. Thank you for your good work. Quicksort exhibits quadratic behavior under some simple scenarios, which I listed, and are also already listed in the article. It's safer to NOT say those are rare conditions in the opening paragraph. If you want to add "rare conditions" again, please add a citation. Arosa (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sixth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1/6.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)