User talk:Chris Capoccia

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bicycle helmets in New Zealand may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in cycling between 1993 and 1997, raising the overall risk of head injury per cyclist.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation |url=http://www.onestreet.org/pdf/Helmet%

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Refs

Ref tool

There is a request for consistent capitalization of article titles here. Wondering if you know of an automated way to do this? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

thanks. i commented on the copd talk page.  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 19:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I like having the url for the books go right to the page the content is on. Additionally if it is a single page that supports the content I typically just state that one. Reverted a couple of your changes. Not sure if you changed any others. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Additionally Chris can you use the same ordering of sections for references as this tool uses. It is what I always use and makes it easier for me to follow. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Dude, you do some amazing reference-related work. Admiring your input on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JFW | T@lk 15:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

thanks  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 05:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Extraversion and introversion

Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Extraversion and introversion, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

you're going to have to be more specific about what specifically was 'non-constructive'. it all seemed fine to me.  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 18:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Extraversion and introversion

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Extraversion and introversion with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

please explain what is 'nonconstructive' about adding page numbers?  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 18:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Ignore both please. This is just a bug in software I am working on. Petrb (talk) 18:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

List of vegetable oils

Hi there. Thanks for contributing to List of vegetable oils. I'm always happy to see contributions. Unfortunately, mixed among the fixes, it appears that you've added some errors, including to references 22, 93 and 95, where it looks like you've deleted most of content of the reference, leaving only the doi or pmid. In a number of other references, it looks like you've deleted the url and accessdate entries. Is there a reason for these deletions? Finally, I notice that you've removed page ranges in many cases, leaving only the first page of the range. Again, is there a reason for the deletion? Waitak (talk) 01:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)