Jump to content

User talk:Chris Capoccia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chris Capoccia (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 23 January 2015 (→‎dyslexia/ do you think its ready for GA nomination?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Merge discussion for Superfruit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Superfruit, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 20:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use the parameter "month" for Template:Cite journal it places articles in the cleanup categories. DrKiernan (talk) 11:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

dyslexia/

I would like to thank you personally , for your edits to this article, I myself have been hard pressed to find someone to help ( I have done about 100 edits / and deleted some 12,000 bytes since taking it ) I want to thank you for this and any contribution--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The Teamwork Barnstar
for your help on dyslexia/wikiproject med Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dyslexia/ do you think its ready for GA nomination?

let me know, here, on my talk page or the article talk page when you can--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

\I think its better if we remove that last line "surface dyslexia" I cant find a secondary ref to it--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it's a pretty good article. i'm don't have any medical background, but it seems to me like it could stand more review articles and fewer primary sources (see WP:RSMED). maybe if you nominate it, someone will step up with enough background to easily identify better sources.  —Chris Capoccia TC 22:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nominated GA ( however there are 300 articles ahead of us) --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the lead-off file (teacup) has been deleted from Wikipedia commons?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yep. copyright violation.

I added something else, what do you think--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

that image only works if you have some reliable source explaining how it actually goes with dyslexia.  —Chris Capoccia TC 18:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


BTW I got Tom (t910001)User_talk:LT910001 to review the article, he's a med reviewer/ done GA nominations before --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


should we just forget about putting a ref on the dyslexic image caption?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] this is the original ref, do you think we need better?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to think you don't even understand the problem. What in any of these references specifically says that this image is at all representative of anything related to the article? As far as I can tell, it's just original research.  —Chris Capoccia TC 22:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]