User talk:Chris Capoccia

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Thank you for all of your help! I just have a couple of questions.

Hi Chris, I have been working on the Bioelectricity Wikipedia page with my colleagues and I really appreciate all the help that you have provided us in making the page more suitable for Wikipedia. We have put in citations in all the places that citations have been requested and also responded to the suggestion to merge with Biomagnetics (which we do not agree with and put our statement in the appropriate talk page a couple of weeks ago). I am wondering if you'd be willing to remove the two tags on the top of the page that indicate the need for the citations (which we have put in) and the suggestion for the merge (which we don't agree with and no one else has added to the conversation)? I really appreciate your help with our efforts to make the field of Bioelectricity more available for the general public to learn about and to hopefully enrich and inspire lives through learning.

Best wishes and many thanks,

Tiadeeharrison (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2018 (EST)

Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL and citation bot

Are you going to continue until the category is empty? I was quite enjoying the ride! :-) Nemo 20:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

trying to… we'll see how long it lasts before the next time someone shuts down citation bot. — Chris Capoccia 💬 21:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs at 24k and Category:Pages with citations lacking titles at 31k... I'm curious where they end up! Nemo 19:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

most of the rest of "Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL" are using templates like cite map that are not supported by citation bot. many of "Pages with citations having bare URLs" and "Pages with citations lacking titles" are actually broken links that citation bot cannot fix. — Chris Capoccia 💬 21:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we can identify the titles most likely to be edited successfully with some regex search? Then you could submit them for citation bot processing without the category method, which is quite intensive. Nemo 06:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

also there are confusing cases like Calau, where the actual mistake is not in that page but in Template:Infobox German location, and that template transcludes other data, so doubtful that any normal person could figure out how to fix the error. — Chris Capoccia 💬 19:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit you added the title "Log in or register to view" in Dutch. That's not helpful! Might you have a way to check for any similar instances, e.g. Facebook domain? That title alone "Aanmelden of registreren om te bekijken" is currently found on 17 pages. – Fayenatic London 11:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again; for the record, I looked into the other instances of that text, and they were all left by Citation bot (I didn't check whether all of the edit summaries also mentioned you). The bot had been fixed,[1] but its past edits had not been; I have fixed those now. – Fayenatic London 20:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that title is now on the bad data list. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2019 Cure Award

In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of one reference in Anthelidae

Hi Chris, I disagree with your removal of a citation to a suplementary table from a reference, as that table has a different set of authors from the paper and in my opinion needs to be attributed correctly. Could you please intimate the logic why something which makes the article more accurate has been removed without an edit summary? I am open to rewording that as I am not aware of the template or guideline for supplementary annexure, in this case a data stored in an Excel sheet. AshLin (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok. i adjusted the citation to specifically mention the checklist. does this solve the problem for you? — Chris Capoccia 💬 18:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks AshLin (talk) 10:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ozone therapy

Thanks Chris for doing all that hard work of getting those citations into order! I was feeling sick at the thought of doing all that legwork myself! Much appreciated ! Fuzzypeg ★ 00:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ref Fixer

Thank you so much for fixing these amount of references, hopefully this will be GA sooner or not, at least it the ref looks good now. 47.187.215.98 (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing urls to cited texts?

Hello, I noticed you removed links to the full text of some citations in the Long-term_effects_of_cannabis article. Could you explain your reasoning behind it?--TZubiri (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]