Jump to content

User talk:Chris Capoccia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nemo bis (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 23 April 2021 (→‎Bad edit. Please fix.: thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thank you for all of your help! I just have a couple of questions.

Hi Chris, I have been working on the Bioelectricity Wikipedia page with my colleagues and I really appreciate all the help that you have provided us in making the page more suitable for Wikipedia. We have put in citations in all the places that citations have been requested and also responded to the suggestion to merge with Biomagnetics (which we do not agree with and put our statement in the appropriate talk page a couple of weeks ago). I am wondering if you'd be willing to remove the two tags on the top of the page that indicate the need for the citations (which we have put in) and the suggestion for the merge (which we don't agree with and no one else has added to the conversation)? I really appreciate your help with our efforts to make the field of Bioelectricity more available for the general public to learn about and to hopefully enrich and inspire lives through learning.

Best wishes and many thanks,

Tiadeeharrison (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2018 (EST)

Thank you!

Dear Chris, thank you for your extensive help with the upgrade of the citatations in Vladimir Zelenko article. Much appreciated. Happy New Year!! IZAK (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say that I reverted your most recent edits on Baieroxylon because it seemed that you were vandalizing (especially hard to tell without an edit summary). If this was not vandalism please edit the article again with a explanatory edit summary. Thank you! Sungodtemple (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no idea what you think in this diff qualifies as vandalism.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 15:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!

Just wanted to thank you for the work you do here every now and then! 201.198.177.120 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding OAbot usage

Hello, thank you for your continued contributions with the OAbot tool! You might have noticed that we are now refreshing the queue more often, but there are many edits left to do so we always need more users. As a developer of the tool I'm kinda biased, so I was thinking whether you could recommend the tool to some other users: I think a simple user talk page message would do a lot! Possible interested users might include the most active editors in the month, I think. Nemo 14:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad edit. Please fix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nucleoside_triphosphate&diff=956460226&oldid=956460161 --50.201.195.170 (talk) 01:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not a "bad edit". i was prepping for cleanup with citation bot. you need to look at the diff for multiple edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nucleoside_triphosphate&type=revision&diff=956460332&oldid=952369098   — Chris Capoccia 💬 12:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this continued cleanup work! Nemo 14:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]