User talk:DITWIN GRIM

The Special Barnstar

Thank you for your work on the Alsace-Lorraine article. I wasn't sure if I liked where you were going with it, but now it's reached a point where yes I do like it. I especially like your choice for the section heading for Annexation to France , which is a great NPOV title for that section and is way more encyclopedic than the temporary moniker "Republic of Alsace-Lorraine". Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 13:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gyor was called Raab – please, do not refer to it! Few names of battles is different in other languages. Hungary only between 1849 and 1867 was a province of the Austrian Empire after the defeat. The Austrian emperor was the king of Hungary and the Hungarian diet independent within the Habsburg Monarchy. In Bohemia or Carniola was not independent diet. Doncsecz^talk 11:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The independent Hungarian army was the Hungarian insurrection. In the battle 16,000 men of the insurrection in his uniform fought againts the Napoleonic army. Doncsecz^talk 12:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Find an English source, which calls into question the independence of Hungary within the Habsburg Monarchy. And I'll tell you why unprofessional. Doncsecz^talk 12:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this is outrageous! You do not know the history of Hungary! Furthermore, those resources is verifiable. Several times was discussion here and elsewhere about the independence of Hungary in the 18th-19th century. So stop the falsification of history! Doncsecz^talk 10:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop calling the dissemination of falsehood! Hungary is not Bohemia: Bohemia lost its the independence after 1620 and was the disenfranchised province of the Habsburg Monarchy. Doncsecz^talk 10:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, finish this falsehood! I studied history at the university and I have reliable sources. Doncsecz^talk 10:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See this chapter: the Hungarian nobility hhat right has decided to accept the Pragmatica Sanctio? Because in Hungary was separate Diet. Doncsecz^talk 10:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source is: the named lexicon about the Hungarian military history, the great lexicon about the History of Hungary and a link from Szilágyi. Doncsecz^talk 10:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source can be checked: because these is great lexicons, in the National Librarys of other States (Austria, UK, USA) can be found. Doncsecz^talk 10:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source a lexicon? Or this commanders Joseph (József) Mesko, Anton (Antal) Gajoli or Emerich (Imre) Bésán was not Hungarians? The Hussard Brigades was not Hungarian forces? And other forces from the countys in own uniforms? Doncsecz^talk 11:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon in Österreich und Ungarn

This is the content of a Austrian book about the Battle of Raab: in the 93. pg. separate chapter about the Hungarian forces in the Battle of Raab: József Zachar Die Insurrektion des Königreichs Ungarn. The insurrection was the Hungary army until 1848. Doncsecz^talk 11:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or see this source in English: 1 Napoleon pushed toward Vienna, his mind made up to prevent at any cost the union of Archduke Johann's forces withdrawing through Graz with the army of Archduke Karl stationed in Austria. The battle of Györ began on 11th June 1809, lasted for several days and ended , for all practical purposes, in a draw. The better equipped, better trained, seasoned and probably better led French forces faced the more spirited and resolute Austro-Hungarian units. Archduke Johann lost 6200 men; the Hungarian insurgents fighting under the leadership of General Andrássy lost 180 dead and 580 seriously wounded. Doncsecz^talk 11:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]