Jump to content

User talk:De Administrando Imperio/Tornado crashes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:De Administrando Imperio

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 89.216.83.39 (talk) at 08:59, 28 June 2008 (→‎ITN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello

I have continued the discussion at the Invasion of Tibet (1950–1951) page. I don't know if you will wait for another person to revert before responding. Benjwong (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anjouan

I think we should move User:TheFEARgod/2008 invasion of Anjouan to 2008 invasion of Anjouan now and merge the content of Anjouan#African_Union_Invasion_of_Anjouan, before the section of that article grows too large... But I won't do it if you don't want to, after all, it's in your userspace and mostly your work. —Nightstallion 13:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No! :) The invasion hasn't yet began --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's still a chance Bacar might surrender (as it usually happens) and there's no invasion. In that case, we could create an article 2007-2008 Anjouan crisis about the standoff and political crisis.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mh, actually, we probably SHOULD make the article 2007–2008 Anjouan crisis regardless of whether there's an invasion or not... What do you say? —Nightstallion 17:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
my vision is that the crisis WITHOUT the invasion is not notable enough to have its own article. Thus, I was thinking of a merger with Anjouan or History of Comoros. Or not?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's most certainly notable enough for an article whether there's an invasion or not; we've had articles on far less massive crises before... —Nightstallion 15:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
your plan is to have two articles?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer to have the article on the invasion expanded, but I could also live with two articles. What do you think? —Nightstallion 20:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
then let's expand the article :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a silly operation name. Like "Iraqi Freedom" --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True enough. "Liberation of Anjouan" would have been as positive and not so silly and seedy. —Nightstallion 14:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking of something with no connotations like "Morning Tides" or something lyrical like that. :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That works, too. ;) —Nightstallion 20:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basra

Procita mi misli sto se tice Basre, preduhitri me pre nego sto ja stigoh da zapocnem neki clanak u vezi bitke. Uzgred mogao bi da pogledas, posto sam ocekivao da ce se ovako nesto desiti sinoc sam napisao Siege of U.K. bases in Basra, da bi se videlo kako su stigli do ovde gde su sada. Dodao sam ga u kutijicu sa bitkama. Pozdrav.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mogao bi da pogledas dodao sam u Campaignbox 2008 Iraq Shi'a Unrest koji sam napravio. Takodje staio sam u kutijicu za Bitku u Basri stavio 8 poginulih policajaca i vojnika jer je za sada potvrdjeno 46 poginulih ukupno, od toga 30 militanata i bar 8 civila, pa valjda je bar 8 snage bezbednosti. Takodje dodao sam i jednog mrtvog britanskog vojnika, malocas su potvrdili da je poginuo u napadu.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promenio sam naziv u 2008 Mahdi Army Revolt posto lako moze da se desi da se borbe produze u april. Jedva uspevam da pohvatam sve izvestaje borbi koji stizu sa juga zemlje i iz Bagdada. Stvarno se kolju, uspeo sam da potvrdim smrt preko 200 Iracana i 5 Amerikanaca (3 vojnika i 2 civila). Onog jednog Britanca ne racunam jer je poginuo u Bagdadu ne u Basri i to u raciji protiv Al Kaide a ne Mehdi Armije.(Top Gun)

People's Liberation Army operations in Tibet (1950–1951) page

Please vote here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlebutterfly (talk • contribs) 18:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:2001_Yugoslav_soldier.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 14:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deleteing articles

I notice that you have been busy tagging a lot of articles for speedy delete. After looking a little closer it seems that you are deleting all of the articles that user langloisrg created, for what appears to be revenge. Although I agree with you that some of the minor operations probably are not needed I do not agree in deleting the Operation templates.--Kumioko (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I agree with you that some of them are unnecessary and that they are poorly written, being poorly written is not justification for deleting them from wikipedia. There are plenty of articles that need work.--Kumioko (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do believe people will vote merge --TheFEARgod (Ч) 18:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Sadr City

Zapoceo sam rad na Siege of Sadr City, proveri ako hoces da izvrsis neke ispravke ili da ubacis neke stvari.(Top Gun)

Domacinski sam doradio i preuredio Siege of Sadr City. Sad bih rekao da izgleda mnogo bolje nego sto je bio. (Top Gun)

2008 Mahdi Army revolt

Izgleda da sam bio u pravu, ponovo su poceli da se ubijaju juce u Bagdadu. Od juce u Bagdadu, 6 americkih vojnika, 9 militanata i 16 civila poginulo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

budi oprezan! to je normal daily toll--TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ne, ne, ovo je bas u Sadr Sitiju, danas je Ministarstvo zdravlja potvrdilo da je 41 poginula osoba primljena u bolnicu u Sadr Sitiju od nedelje. Nego hteo sam da te pitam. Danas je Sadr otkazao sutrasnje demonstracije i pripretio da ce obustaviti prekid vatre. U tom slucaju. Ako u narednih par dana je obustavljen prekid vatre, da li bi onda trebali da ponovo vratimo nazad naziv onog clanka na 2008 Mahdi Army revolt i da nastavimo da ga doradjujemo? Posto bi onda okrsaji od 23.03. do 31.03. bili samo runda jedan. Kao ono sto je bilo u Mogadisuu u Somaliiji prosle godine. Mislim da su oni prosli kroz tri runde do kraja.

bravo što si se sjetio za Mogadišu. Ako al-Sadr obustavi prekid vatre ubaci second phase ili tako nekako. Ne revolt, najbolje bi ime bilo Iraq Spring Fighting of 2008 --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dobar je naziv Iraq Spring Fighting of 2008. Doradio sam ga malo, posto trenutno se samo bore u Sadr Sitiju, u ostatku zemlje je jos mirno, za sada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion of Tibet

Someone has proposed a move back to the original title of this article. It would be great to have your input. Please chime in. Thanks. Yunfeng (talk) 20:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:2001 macedonia police.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Wikiproject Terrorism Newsletter

The Terrorism WikiProject
April 2008 Newsletter

News

Archives • Discussion

Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 05:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Tibet

Someone has proposed editing the History of Tibet article up to Good Article status. However, so far he's only asked Chinese editors. Since you've been interested in editing the Invasion of Tibet article, your help would be warmly appreciated. Longchenpa (talk) 03:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piracy in Somalia

Seeing that you have done an excellent job of editing the War in Somalia timelines, I though you would like to know that I recently created the page piracy in Somalia. The chronology section is in dire needs of expansion and this type of thing seems to be your cup of tea. Any help would be appreciated, but there's no rush, and if your not interested, no hard feelings. – Zntrip 22:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalija

Mozda bi trebalo da zapocnemo clanak nazvan Battle of Mogadishu (2008), posto imamo vec dva o onoj iz rane 2007.-e i onaj iz novembra 2007. Ova bitka je u stvari veca od one iz novembra. Sta mislis? Top Gun

Evo zapoceo sam ga, uglavnom sam copy pejstovao ono sto si ti vec bio izkucao i timelin-u rata za 2008, Battle of Mogadishu (2008). Top Gun

Okej. Top Gun

Bio u komsiluku pa da se javim.Top Gun

He,he. Doci ce red i na to. Navraticu jednom i u BiH. Dovraga moram, vucem korene odande od pre dve generacije. Il' tako nesto.Top Gun

Sri Lanka

Hvala na referenci.Top Gun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nije mi palo napamet Three-revert rule. Sada cu da pokusam nekako da izadjem na kraj sa njim u debati. Svi moji argumenti su validni, ali njemu nikako to da udje u glavu. Pa neznam sta da radim sa ovakvim tipom.Top Gun

Please respect the Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement

This is a friendly notice. You may have overlooked that the article Sri Lankan Civil War, which you reverted, is under the WP:SLR § Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement subject to edit restrictions. This means, among other things, that it is not allowed to revert to the same version more than once a day. Since there was also an other account who performed the same reversions as you, please be advised that this restriction is on a per version basis, not on a per account basis. Please therefore best avoid reverting articles that are subject to this agreement. As the blue box specifies, please instead report any issues at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation. Thank you for your understanding and future cooperation. --— Sebastian 08:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your confusion over UNITAF

In response to your confusion as to why UNITAF is regarded as a success, it may be helpful to read the "Results" section of the article. Additionally, your question is not new and was raised here as well. Hope that helps! BWH76 (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency-related page moves

I have reverted a few recent page moves which you performed:

In the latter two cases, I was motivated by two factors. First, "X conflict" and "X insurgency" are generally much more commonly used than "Insurgency in X". Second, the topic of the article is not insurgency in South Thailand generally, but a single specific insurgency; thus, a title such as "South Thailand insurgency" is less generic and more clearly identifies the scope of the article. Black Falcon (Talk) 17:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compare the results for "Insurgency in South Thailand with those for "South Thailand insurgency. The latter is usage is about 10 times more common. Similarly, "Sa'dah conflict" is much more common than "Insurgency in Sadah". The fact that other articles use "Insurgency in X" may just be an indication that they need to be renamed (since, again, none of the article consider the general topic of insurgency in a particular country, but rather cover a specific insurgency within a country). Black Falcon (Talk) 20:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say that everything should be "X insurgency" or "X wars", and I only raised the possibility that the three articles which you gave as examples (incidentally, I noticed that you either creator or moved all three to their current titles) ought to be renamed.
As for the Google numbers, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, "article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize". So, while Google numbers are never definitive, they ought to be considered.
Finally, as I've noted, "Insurgency in X" is an ambiguous title, since it does not clearly reflect the scope of an article. The article South Thailand insurgency is not an article about insurgency in South Thailand in general (as suggested by the alternate title of Insurgency in South Thailand), but is rather an article about a single, specific insurgency currently taking place there. Black Falcon (Talk) 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds good; and I won't move or re-move any additional articles until we've had more opportunity to discuss this and reach a consensus. I'll post a notice at Talk:Insurgency in Sa'dah to invite comment from other users. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 20:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article needed

... on this strike movement in Egypt which utilises Facebook? —Nightstallion 23:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not an expert on strikes ;) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shabab al-Muomineen

A tag has been placed on Shabab al-Muomineen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2008 invasion of Anjouan

Your good article nomination for the article 2008 invasion of Anjouan has passed , see Talk:2008 invasion of Anjouan noting my passage of the article. Great work on it! Hello32020 (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thx very much :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 07:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ofanziva

Izgleda da si u pravu. Izgleda da se odlucili konacno da krenu u juris u centar Sadr Sitija. Ovo mi mirise na jos jednu bitku u staljingradskom stilu s obzirom kako su se Amerikanci ekstra proveli samo na ivici distrikta.(Top Gun)

Somalia

Thanks for reminding me. I was trying to find the name of the town on the map and I completely forgot about it. That'll teach me to do more then one thing at a time. Furious Stormrage (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did have the source. But I was also busy gathering some evidence about HIV prevalance in Nigeria. I clicked submit and I knew I forgot to finish editing the Somali article and I thought I got it all when I did the two subsequent edits. I guess not.

By the way. The only part that seems to be the same has the May 8th casualty list is the IED in Baidoa. But the number of deaths and wounds are to different. I think It's safe to remove it since it was a Somali Soldier who said it. They aren't exactly known for telling the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furious Stormrage (talk • contribs) 15:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liban

Hoces ti ili ja da zapocnem nesto u vezi ovoga sto se sad ubijaju po Libanu. Pet mrtvih javljaju.(Top Gun)

Evo uradio sam 2008 Beirut clashes.(Top Gun)

Pod policajac sam mislio clan snaga obezbedjenja parlamenta. Oni su eo vladinih snaga bezbednosti. U redu moze ovako da stavimo jedan mrtav pa u zagradi snage bezbednosti?(Top Gun)

Pogledaj talk page za kutijicu WoT.(Top Gun)

U redu u tom slucaju stavio sam dva vojnika koja su poginula u deo infobox-a u kome su civilne zrtve. Treba razlikovati koliko je civila a koliko oruzanih lica poginulo s obzirom kako libanska vlada non-stop prica da su ogromne civilne zrtve, ali kako pristizu podaci sve manje i manje u stvari ima mrtvih civila nego pripadnika paravojnih formacija.(Top Gun)

Stani malo, sto si izbacio 2008 unrest in Lebanon iz Campaignbox za Rat protiv terorizma. Nismo se jos nista dogovorili. Pa danas je izraelski predsednik izbacio optuzbe da su Iran i Sirija odgovorni za ovo sto se desava. Plus, stavise rekao je i da su oni odgovorni sto je Pojas Gaze pao u ruke Hamasa, a to smo povezali sa Ratom protiv terorizma. Predsednik je lepo rekao da nametanjem svog uticaja u Libanu i pojasu Gaze oni pokusavaju da strateski okruze Izrael. Sto vrlo logicno zvuci. Drugim recima pad pojasa Gaze i trenutna situacija u Libanu su povezani u jednom smislu reci.(Top Gun)

Uradio sam Timeline of the 2008 unrest in Lebanon, ispravi ako mislis da treba nesto da se ispravi ali ja mislim da je sasvim odgovarajuce.(Top Gun)

Proveri talk page za 2008 unrest in Lebanon. Lucias21 je pokrenuo vaznu raspravu. Ocigledno je da medju 38 osoba koje su poginule koje su zavedene kao civili, sigurno ima vise od 15 pripadnika pro-vladinih snaga. Izneo sam predlog tamo, na strainci za diskusije, pa mi reci ti sta mislis.(Top Gun)

synthesizing

The section about Ethiopia on Prees TV is synthesizing, and a violation of WP:OR which states "Synthesizing material occurs when an editor tries to demonstrate the validity of his or her own conclusions by citing sources that when put together serve to advance the editor's position". The section is also citing Press TV as a primary source to criticize Press TV, that is against the rules as well.--Sina111 (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you`re synthesizing. The Macleans source is an editorial and makes no mention of Somalia whatsoever. The other two "sources" are unreliable partisan pro-Ethiopian websites which fail WP:RS.--Sina111 (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan

Izvini sto ti ne odgovorih pre, nisam bio ni cuo za te borbe dok mi ti nisi rekao. Izgleda da su poprilicno jake borbe. Neki pricaju da ovo moze da izazove sveopsti gradjanski rat u Sudanu. Mislim da bi trebalo zapoceti neki clanak.(Top Gun)

Javljaju da su 22 vladina vojnika poginula tokom borbi. S obzirom da vlada ne odaje brojeve svojih poginulih tako lako i plus jos ovoliko da su priznali to znaci da je verovatno bas gadno.(Top Gun) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.83.39 (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1920 Haiyuan earthquake

Hi, I noticed that you moved 1920 Haiyuan earthquake to 1920 Gansu earthquake on May 25, 2008. I request to move it back to 1920 Haiyuan earthquake and gave my reasons at Talk:1920 Gansu earthquake on May 31. If you do not oppose, I will move it back. If you disagree, please leave your opinions at Talk:1920 Gansu earthquake. Thanks. --Neo-Jay (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent nonsense

Hello. May I ask you to have a look at The Independent Somali State? I'm assuming this is a good candidate for deletion. Biruitorul Talk 05:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Trsat

Hi - would you take a look at this article and my comments on its talk page? I can't read the sources except the English language one, and that doesn't say what the creator of the article says it does, so -- was there a siege? Or an ambush? Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


2008 South Africa riots

You've previously express interest in the renaming of this article. I'd like to gather some views on the matter now, so the page doesn't continue to languish with its current name. If you have a moment, can you pop into the talk page, please? Thanks. 9Nak (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

Current events globe On 12 June, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Gora Prai airstrike, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BanyanTree 04:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gora Prai airstrike

Good start! Bearian (talk) 23:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Ras Doumeira border crisis

Just to let you know, some one has made this page: 2008 Ras Doumeira border crisis. You might want to find a way to integrate it with your Djiboutian-Eritrean War page. – Zntrip 04:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

I am not overly familiar with Kosovo. Would you be able to explain why you are not in favour of the independence of Kosovo but seem to support so many other independence movements?Cillmore (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I feel compassion with many peoples without states (Kurds, American Indians) but I am against the independence of Kosovo because the Albanians already have Albania, because it was illegal under UN law, because it was a move pushed by the U.S. (I don't think you need explanations for that)--TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

Current events globe On 18 June, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Battle of Arghandab, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Pharos (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

Izgleda da je pao u vodu mirovni dogovor izmedju Talibana i Pakistanaca. Pakistanska vojska je napala Talibanska uporišta oko Pešavara danas.(Top Gun)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:De_Administrando_Imperio/Tornado_crashes&oldid=222246125"