Please notify uploader when you tag image as no source/no license

When you tag an image with those two tags, please also follow the template's instruction and notify the uploader. Many thanks. --WinHunter ^(talk) 12:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Maps

If they have been replaced with better maps: fine. However, if they've just been removed from the articles by people for no adequate reason, then they want putting back rather than deleting from the internet forever. Morwen - Talk 12:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Chess images

Don't mind at all--if they're orphaned, it's best that they're deleted. Go ahead. --Camembert 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Channelv.jpg

Feel free to delete, no longer used long replaced, however it was put under the right copyright license as far as I know seeing as it IS a logo. - Mike Beckham 10:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Libya Municipalites

Thank you for your enquiry, It was wrong of me not to give a reason for the deletes but yet the deletes are very valid. The reason I removed the images from the individual municipality pages is because the maps contained 26 municipalities whereas Libya now has 32 Image:Libya New Municipalities.png. It would just have been confusing for the readers if I left the old maps. If somebody wants to know the location of a particular municipality they can refer to the main Libya page. Hope it's not a problem Jaw101ie 18:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Quick image delete

Hey. I noticed that you're doing a lot of image work (lots of IFD nominations). I wanted to point quickimgdelete, a handy little javascript that speedies up the IFD process. You can copy the three scripts that you need from my monobook.js. Just post it in your monobook.js. In the toolbox, you can tage the images accordingly. Hbdragon88 21:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

RE: CA/SR shields

Hi,

Sure, they can all be removed as they have been eclipsed by SVGs. Thanks for doing this. atanamir 05:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Use of logos in Betelgeuse incident

Hello, Fritz. I am currently involved in a dispute with two editors about the use of the Gulf Oil logo in the Betelgeuse incident article. It seems to me that this logo does not significantly contribute to the article, and thus fails the eighth point of the Wikipedia fair-use policy. The Total logo has just recently been added to the article, and though I haven't yet said anything about it, I think this image also adds nothing significant. I would appreciate your opinion on the matter; the discussion is ongoing at Image talk:Gulf.png. Thank you for your time. —Bkell (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

subst

Hey there. Just a real quick minor thing, I modified one of your edits to add a subst to a template that you'd added to a user talk page. Not a biggie but just wanted to let you know what I'd done and why I'd done it...! Cheers, Budgiekiller 20:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion note, but the html...

Thanks for the note about an image that I uploaded or edited being deleted. One small note: there was no need to give your comment a special background colour, it was no more important than the comments of other wikipedians who edited my page. But thanks for the note anyway. Gronky 14:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I see now that the obnoxious html is part of a template, so I've left a comment there. Gronky 14:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Simply a curiosity

I've checked your contrib page and noticed you spend ALL time checking images here. Don't you get bored? Don't you ever feel the necessity to add some constructive contain to Wikipedia? Ciao and good work.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Attilios (talk • contribs) .

Ah, OK. Can I ask your help for copyedit of my short article at C'eravamo tanto amati. I'm not of English motherlanguage. Ciao and good work--Attilios 13:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Bot on stamps

Hi Fritz, Can you please run the bot on Category:Fair use stamp images? A lot of them are orphaned, as they have been removed from articles where fair use doesn't apply. Thanks. --Ragib 01:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice

Hi! I am working lately in the List of films and have uploaded only few missing images for film infoboxes and always care to tag them and state source. It is however the second time that another user finds an earlier original movie poster and swaps it. If I keep contributing missing images which then get orphaned, is there anyway to avoid getting messages in my talk page, or is it standard practice? Hoverfish 10:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC) By the way Image:TheMagicChristian.jpg has also been orphaned for the same reason, but it has not been tagged for deletion. Can you please tag it so? Hoverfish 10:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Training Squadron 10

hi there, thanks for the orphaned image notice...it was part of an entry that was erroneously deleted by overzealous persons [long story]..anyway, i have rebuilt the entry..and attempted to put he image back in, but for soem reason it won't work for me...I am not he best with adding images....i did however remove the tag on the image that you had asked to be removed. thanks for your kind help...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bondoa6 (talk • contribs) .

Crazy (Gnarls Barkley song)

It is not my responsibility to find the reference. If you want that included on the page then you need to find it yourself. I have added Crazy (Gnarls Barkley song) to my watchlist. KazakhPol 20:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I have removed four references that were either broken or did not mention Barkley's Crazy. You may re-add the mention of Furtado covering the song as the reference currently listed as 13 supports that. Regards, KazakhPol 21:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

You need to stop trying to intimidate me. WP:BLP applies here, so those policies are moot. KazakhPol 16:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I think you are misunderstanding... WP:BLP applies here because the unsourced claim that Billy Idol covered this song could easily be seen as a negative statement. The page in question does not have to be a biography for WP:BLP to apply. The page only needs to have unsourced, negative claims about a living invidual. Reference #20 still does not mention Billy Idol covering the song. I want you to either remove his name, point out where on the page currently referenced it mentions Crazy, or find a reference that shows Idol covered the song. KazakhPol 19:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. KazakhPol 00:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

RE:Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jimmy Celebrates "Sweetest Day".JPEG)

The license was wrong on the image (it isn't fair use... it is public domain). I've updated it.--Isotope23 19:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

...or at least I think it is. Scan of a document that is in the public domain. Would that be public domain as well or fair use?--Isotope23 19:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Orphaned fair use image (Image:24-conspiracypicep2.jpg)

Go ahead and delete this and any Conspiracy pics I uploaded that aren't in use. I've won't be using them in the near future anyway. --Twlighter 20:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

No Cover Available Issue

; Archives
	March 2005 – February 2006; March 2006 – August 2006; ; ;

Thank you Fritz, I replied to your message at Image talk:Nocover.jpg.