User talk:Johnuniq: Difference between revisions
Edit warring |
Dronebogus (talk | contribs) →user:Smefs again: new section |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
==Continued edit warring during open discussion== |
==Continued edit warring during open discussion== |
||
Even though one person was already blocked for edit-warring on this, two others continue: [[Richard D'Oyly Carte]]. Can you please return it to the status quo ante? -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 04:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
Even though one person was already blocked for edit-warring on this, two others continue: [[Richard D'Oyly Carte]]. Can you please return it to the status quo ante? -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 04:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
== [[user:Smefs]] again == |
|||
The user is now baselessly accusing me of being a sock of some user they have a grudge against. This is sufficient evidence to demonstrate they are uninterested in actually getting unblocked. I think revoking their talk page rights is in order. [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|talk]]) 16:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:48, 10 July 2024
I'll reply to messages here, unless requested otherwise. |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Unanswered unblock request
There’s an unblock request here that hasn’t been answered in two weeks. I won’t cast judgement on its validity but I think the user has a right to know whether they’ll be unblocked. Dronebogus (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: After a fair bit of thought, I declined the request. Johnuniq (talk) 09:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Continued edit warring during open discussion
Even though one person was already blocked for edit-warring on this, two others continue: Richard D'Oyly Carte. Can you please return it to the status quo ante? -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
user:Smefs again
The user is now baselessly accusing me of being a sock of some user they have a grudge against. This is sufficient evidence to demonstrate they are uninterested in actually getting unblocked. I think revoking their talk page rights is in order. Dronebogus (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)