User talk:Luis9595
Welcome!
|
April 2018
August 2018
March 2019
- You reverted a properly summaried editor's change, and did not provide an edit summary of your own. This action if repeated can be seen as disruptive, and ultimately warring. You have changed place-to-London distances in other articles. Please be aware that MOS states that distances between two points are by straight line, to make them comparable with other distances throughout all Wikipedia articles; anything other than straight line makes such useful comparison meaningless. There are web pages that will help you provide these London distances, London being centred on Charing Cross: such as this. Acabashi (talk) 10:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2020
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Edit Warring at European Union
I have had no choice but to report you to admins for edit warring at European Union. I and many other editors have reverted your edits and asked you to take your reasons for your edits for discussion to the talk page. You have failed to do this and persist in edit warring. This is against Wikipedia policy WP:WAR. It doesn't matter whether you believe you are right and we are all in the wrong you have been asked to discuss the issue at the article's talk page and this you must do. Unfortunately a temporary block on you editing seems to be the only sanction that is possible because you will not offer due respect to both other editors and Wikipedia policies. Please read the policies of Wikipedia and specifically the one on edit warring so you understand why this situation has arisen and how you should act as an editor in the future. Robynthehode (talk) 14:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Luis9595 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry for what i did i won't do it again Luis9595 (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Since you seem to understand that you need to discuss controversial edits and not edit war, I will remove the block. You may also want to learn about avenues of dispute resolution should talk page discussion fail. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
How will you resolve an editing dispute in the future? 331dot (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC) I will use the talk page
- @Dreamy Jazz: Please could you consider partial blocks next time? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The article List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An indiscriminate list. People with no connection with Italy gaining citizenship to play football for the national team might be a notable topic, but simply being born abroad is not.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Pontificalibus 08:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)