Wikipedia:Peer review/Brutalism/archive1
Appearance
I am fairly proud of this article after having done a lot of reasearch to make it not only look good, but explain its topic well within appropriate contexts.
I'd like to see it be a suitable nominee for FAC. I am sure that my involvement in it limits my ability to assess its fitness with those requirements.
Should something be expanded? Reworded? Separated? Is more detail or information needed somewhere? Is there a glaringly omitted section? Is the list OK or does it need to be moved off?
Regards, Keith D. Tyler ¶ [AMA] 23:59, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)