Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daniel Quinlan (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 14 July 2024 (→‎User talk:Aj631314: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Match protection of redirect target. Not many transclusions at any one time, but tends to be translcuded in pages with millions of daily views. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The target is protected at the template editor level, not extended confirmed level. Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: You very recently ECP protected Template:Current event. Perhaps that should be template-editor protected to match the redirect target {{Current}}? I'm not sure of standard procedure but it seems desirable to me. Johnuniq (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I based the level on several factors, including the current vandal and likely vandals, reverters and other editors, that it's a lesser used redirect, and indeed activity at the redirect target (whose protection level was also recently changed). I'm content, however I have absolutely no objections if someone else wants to adjust it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple cases of IP vandalism MarcusAbacus (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing edit war involves around if a fan game based on Bubsy should be listed. NatwonTSGTALK 16:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP additions of contentious material. Some IPs have repeatedly added nearly the same info that Mr Zinke had some connection to some fraudsters: 5 April 2021, 24 May 2024, 6 July 2024. 13 July 2024. 14 July 2024. It's on the talk page too. Reverting just leads to re-addition. Is long-term semi-protection possible? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 18:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:3FB4:CF00::/64 (talk · contribs). Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 19:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:871:223::/48 (talk · contribs). Temporarily blocked for edit warring. If the edit warring resumes, please report to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 19:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:871:223::/48 (talk · contribs). Temporarily blocked for edit warring. If the edit warring resumes, please report to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 19:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:871:223:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Quinlan. for 31 hours. Which helps the previous entries. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. May this comment please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. May this comment please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 20:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. May this comment please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 22:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's better to change the block settings as detailed in WP:UTPROT. I'm going to leave that decision to the administrators already involved. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]