Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neutralhomer (talk | contribs) at 19:11, 28 March 2024 (→‎Template:REC US). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template is under-used, transcluded on only 35 33 32 pages. NeutralhomerTalk16:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's underused because, in my estimation, adding it as a standard transclusion to infoboxes (as suggested) is not needed. However, that's not a reason to delete it; there are pages where it could be useful. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 03:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Sammi. Their knowledge of the various radio and station templates has been proven in the past. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cite GREC with Template:GEC.
They cover the identical source, the Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana. GEC has 14 mainspace inlinks and is more recent (but no doc); GREC has 17 (and iffy doc). My preference is that the merged name be 'Cite GEC' (and that all such wrappers should start with 'Cite'; they are so much easier to find when they do). Mathglot (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created Cite GREC and I have no objections because they cover the same source. That said, calling other volunteers' well-intentioned work "iffy" is not nice, even if it really is iffy.
Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I beg your pardon. I'm aware of different priorities for getting a valuable template available for others to use, where a volunteer editor may not have the time to also document it, and I value your contribution. Possibly my alter ego as a template-documentation gnome makes me more critical on documentations issues than I ought to be. I apologize; no offense intended. Mathglot (talk) 08:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links (and one duplicate link), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't people read articles anymore? Surely the information should be at George_Fox_Bruins_football#List_of_head_coaches before it is in a navbox. And that's where you can see the data in context. Also, WP:WTAF, redlinks in navboxes should not be used to create articles. --woodensuperman 16:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The thing is, it isn't at that article. The navbox is the only place to find such information presently. WTAF is also an essay; but redlinks in navboxes are beneficial – a college football article creation campaign was even based on them. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Then it should be at the article. Add the information there. Navboxes are for linking between WP:EXISTING articles. The Wikiproject is abusing navboxes by using them in this way. --woodensuperman 08:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No its not. Per the link you just cited, Red links should normally be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles. Red links can be retained in navigation templates that represent a well-defined and complete set of data. This meets both of those; the articles are likely to be developed (especially with the article creation campaign; improving the encyclopedia is not "abusing navboxes"), and these represent a well-defined and complete set of data that we would not want to lose. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps the odd red is okay when the majority of the links are blue, but that clearly isn't the case here, a couple of blue links in a whole sea of red. It's not providing a navigation function, the sole purpose of a navbox. --woodensuperman 15:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I still think it provides worth for navigation, e.g. if I was a reader, and if I was looking up Chris Casey (current coach) and wanted to know, "are there any other George Fox coaches with articles", I'd look at the navbox and find Earl Craven. And I'd also be informed of the rest of the team's coaching history. Perhaps the odd red is okay when the majority of the links are blue, but that clearly isn't the case here – I'm not seeing any policy stating that? All that is required is that (a) there is a good probability of the coaches getting articles – which there is, due to the coach article campaign, that exists because of these useful navboxes, or (b) it is a complete set of well-defined data that we want to have – also check. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only three blue links to individual articles, the rest are redirects or links to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. Not to mention it is almost certain there could be more bluelinks made if the redlinks are created. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not sure of / if there's a policy specific on this(?), but generally it seems fine to me to have navboxes when there's multiple links, especially of this type; coach navboxes like this are very useful IMO, both to editors and I'd think those who want to know more about the coaching history of their programs (as its often the only place to find it). NENAN is an essay. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only two blue links to individual articles, the rest are redirects or links to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only one blue link to an individual article, the rest are redirects or link to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only one blue link to an individual article, the rest are redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No blue links to individual articles, only to sections within articles. This template does not provide adequate navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two blue links that lead to individual articles, the rest link to article sections or are redirects because they were deemed non-notable. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only blue links are to sections of articles because the topics were not notable on their own. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains one blue link, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a good subject for a navbox, this is list content masquerading as a navbox. --woodensuperman 16:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll move it. Thanks for the notice. ;) Alexis Coutinho (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't get rid of the redirects though... Alexis Coutinho (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Still unused 4 years after last nomination. Can't be useful if no one uses it. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in tests and one talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in one old talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in one sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please move to my sandbox. Artoria2e5 🌉 09:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7 (you could have just asked). Primefac (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Unused module other than in one old user module sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in one sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the user who created this module. That plan sounds good to me, as I am not actively developing it anymore. If I ever decide to work on it again it will be preserved in my sandbox. Cin316 (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in one old user module sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module other than in one example in talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved and G7'd since I don't have page-mover. Someday I'll finish it. SWinxy (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]