Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zhuyifei1999 (talk | contribs) at 00:56, 14 January 2021 (Reverted 2 edits by YiFeiBot (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


December 2020

Requesting copyedit before going to FAC, per peer review suggestions.DMT biscuit (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to a recent review 'Even with some adjustments the prose is still fairly difficult to penetrate with a lot of statistics, topic-specific language which isn't explained - "primary energy" for example, short sentences which impede readability and give the impression that this article is notes toward a more developed article: "Most oil products are used for road transport." "A nuclear power plant is under construction." "This includes using energy efficiently. ", a number of one sentence paragraphs, and very short sub-sections. The overall feel is of a jerky, incomplete article.'. And I agree with the reviewer that 'with a good copy-edit the article would improve'. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded article. Tintor2 (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

: Working Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article King Ludwig Oak requires fixing of grammatical errors, if any. I have done correcting a lot, still looking for help for further correction. It is currently listed for GA nomination (GAN). Thank you. — Amkgp 💬 17:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An old FA that I've worked on and think needs a copyedit. LittleJerry (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prepping for GAN. Thanks in advance! :-) – zmbro (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prepping for FAC. Considering beginning a WP:SPLIT discussion for Industrial Society and Its Future, but I'd like the opinion of someone more experienced with FAC before doing so. The refs need some work as well (see "Copy edit notes and queries" on the talk page), so if anyone is willing to work on those it would be much appreciated! AviationFreak💬 16:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently undergoing an FAC process. It did not really go well as of now: two editors formally opposed it due to the article's flaws, especially on how the reception section is formatted. I tried remodeling, but it still doesn't really read well. Would love it if anyone can help copyedit it, especially on its reception section to have a more natural flow of read (note: in the FAC WP:RECEPTION is cited frequently). GeraldWL 04:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To the talented GOCE copyedits, I would like to request a copyedit of this article for a future DYK and potential future FA (FAC). Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information in the meantime. West Virginian (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this newly promoted GA. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting a copy-edit for this article for a future GA nomination (GAN). Thank you! Paparazzzi (talk) 08:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded article. Iamfarzan (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting for its grammer/wordings/flow. All help would be appreciated! OceanHok (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose: FAC. When I put this article up at FAC, reviewers felt it was not good enough yet and suggested a peer review first, before bringing it back. See FAC review. The peer reviewer kindly suggested I make a request here at the Guild. See peer review. Not being a native speaker I always need help on prose. I would appreciate any help to get the article in such a shape that it is likely to pass at FAC next time. Thanks, Edwininlondon (talk) 07:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. Yeepsi (talk) 20:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished it hurrily and I know that I have missed many issues regarding grammar etc, since I am nominating it for Good Article status (GAN), I need help in copyediting. Heba Aisha (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. I have recently expanded the above article, and I would greatly appreciate a thorough copy-edit. The article still requires a great deal of work, but I think a copy-edit would be helpful so it could have a strong foundation for whomever wants to continue with it in the future. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. I recently rewrote this article as I was disappointed by my past work on it after rereading it. I would greatly appreciate a thorough copy-edit to make sure that it still meets the GA criteria for prose. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article about a Bangladeshi statesman (the first prime minister of Bangladesh) has seen significant expansion since last August. Peer reviewers have rated it close to a good article. A copy edit would improve its readability further. Farhan nasim (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of contents in the article is not written in an encycloepediac way especially the history section. Please help to improve the articleShahoodu (talk) 06:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, I've been putting some hard work on this article and I'm planning to take it to GA (GAN) status. Since English is not my native language, I feel like I need some help with prose/copy-edit and such problems. I worked on GAs before, but I've been inactive for years (plus I don't have any experience working on soccer coaches' articles) so any suggestions would be welcome. For example, I've never been good at writing leads, so that may be a start. Thanks in advance Gunt50 (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created article. Iamfarzan (talk) 14:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose = GAN

I have nominated this article for GA so I believe that it is in reasonably good shape though, as a primary editor of it, I'm hardly objective. An informal reviewer pre-nomination advised that I request a proof-read to avoid a technical failure. I would [should?] be most grateful if a member of the Guild would wield the blue pencil, please. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Big expansion of what was once a redirect, so it could do with the usual excellent GOCE once over please, before GAN. 2A00:23C7:4E01:9C01:385B:DDCC:837:BA46 (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this IP requester does not appear to have contributed to this article; see its history. Discuss at REQ Talk. Baffle☿gab 15:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP requester hasn't but I have. I support the request, it is a good idea. Is this OK, or do I need to do more to make sure it gets the copy edit it deserves? Thanks Norfolkbigfish (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries Norfolkbigfish; I've struck my note. Carry on. :) Cheers Baffle☿gab 01:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on the Disney television series Hannah Montana and just had it upgraded to a Good Article. I will be looking at doing a Peer Review (PR) and nominating as a FAC in the future, so I would appreciate a copy-edit before I do so. Many thanks in advance. SatDis (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to take this article to to the ACN (it is currently awaiting GA review). Could someone please help improve flow of the prose and grammar. Thanks. Tomobe03 (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: One of my other copyedit requests was closed and then reopened, so I'm moving this to the end of the queue to cancel effects of having three active requests--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The intent is to bring this article to FAC status. However, it is currently a work in progress. I expect it will take me a few more weeks to finish up the sections that are being worked on. I was hoping to find someone who could work through what I have done already, and then assist as the new sections are finished off? So far, the lede (to be tweaked as the article is rounded off) and sections 1-5 are complete. Any assistance in brushing up the language and helping reduce the deadweight would be very much appreciated, as the article keeps growing and I am weary of it becoming too large. I am currently working on section 6. Would it be inappropriate to also request the same treatment (FAL intent) to sub articles (just a couple of extra paragraphs really): List of orders of battle for the British 2nd Division, List of senior officers of British 2nd Division, and List of Victoria Cross recipients from the British 2nd Division‎?EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please limit requests to one article at a time. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this recently promoted Good article. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

This article has been recently expanded by yours truly and could do with a neat copyedit for a future GAN nomination. MWright96 (talk) 10:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Huey Long, the governor of Louisiana and a US Senator. A proponent of radical solutions to end the Great Depression, he was assassinated in 1935. A GA, it just failed as a FAC and needs some prose work. The issues were discussed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Huey Long/archive1. ~ HAL333 14:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got this failed as FA (FAC) recently, mainly due to grammatical errors. Interested editors would be appreciated. GeraldWL 15:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to bring this to GA (GAN) in the future. Happy new year.Tintor2 (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copyedit for B-class status. (BCN) Lazman321 (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a GAN.TeenAngels1234 (aka Berserkelion) (talk) 10:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article, rated top-importance for WP:POLAND, reached GA status in 2006 and has recently been nominated for re-assessment (GAR) which is currently ongoing. It would be really helpful to provide some attention to the prose and the neutrality of some of the phrasing. Any help would be gratefully appreciated. —Brigade Piron (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After a discussion on the talk page, we decided we needed help editing this article. Specifically, there are concerns about over quotation & NPOV. We would appreciate the copy-edit as this article has been rated "top-importance" for the D&D wiki project. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A FA on its way to being removed due to prose issues (FAR). A copyedit may not be enough, but it wouldn't hurt. LittleJerry (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Gog the Mild (talk) 22:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Failed to become good article due to prose and style problems detailed at Talk:Electricity_sector_in_Turkey#GA_Review. I hope to nominate it again as it passed the other GA criteria. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simple copy-editing required, mostly to expand lead based on article body and doing fixes in the main article body. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 10:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently completed a major expansion of this artist bio article, and I'd like to submit it for GAN soon. Since so much of the text is new, I'd love the help of an extra pair of eyes. Thanks! Wingedserif (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan establishment worships some things (This time Cynthia D. Ritchie) so much, to know reality Wikipedia articles need to be Copy edited a bit just for general clean up. Bookku (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of extensive copyediting for its grammer/wordings/flow. All help would be appreciated! OceanHok (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New article about Indian Sanskrit-language play. Needs copy-editing for grammar, style and tone. Thanks in advance. --Gazal world (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting professional copy edit in preparation of GAN. Doug Coldwell (talk) 09:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request a native English speaker to take a look at the article before concluding the GA Review. Translation from the original Swedish article.Alexander Alejandro (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page has recently had significate changes made and would benefit from a review by someone who fully understands Wikipedia's style manuals, etc. This was put forward for copy-editing before and declined in September 2019 as some tags cropped up on the page about needing more sources (which have now been supplied, in excess). I think now is a good time for the page to be reviewed as it is now beyond passed it's brand-new stage. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help. Jwikiediting (talk) 01:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article was recently promoted to GA, and I would like to move forward with an FA in the near future. truflip99 (talk) 22:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. Yeepsi (talk) 09:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting professional copy edit for GAN.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I approved this article for a DYK, but I find the first paragraph of the "Production" section somewhat shaky. Could you copy-edit it for me, please? --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted correcting it by myself. SL93 (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the article for GA status and I appreciate any help in copyediting it. SL93 (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New article about a series of literary biographies. Needs minor copy editing and paraphrasing. Thanks in advance. Gazal world (talk) 22:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible future GA nomination, I think it needs some copyediting. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 07:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to nominate Tito–Šubašić Agreements for ACN (its GAR is pending right now) and I believe its prose could be improved in terms of grammar and flow. Could someone please help? Thanks --Tomobe03 (talk) 12:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article could be favored by some copy-editing after a major expansion. A revision would be nice before a GAN.GDuwenHoller! 19:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded.Tintor2 (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]