Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish words of Italic origin (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Radiant! (talk | contribs) at 15:41, 19 February 2011 (→‎List of Spanish words of Italic origin: no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

List of Spanish words of Italic origin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was traswiki'd to Wiktionary in March 2010 after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish words of Italic origin reached no consensus. The transwiki'd content has since been developed into wikt:Appendix:Spanish words of Italic origin. The content is therefore duplicated, making this page redundant.

I am also nominating 'List of Spanish words of Italian origin', which was split from 'List of Spanish words of Italic origin' following the earlier AfD.

List of Spanish words of Italian origin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Cnilep (talk) 06:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all articles of this type WP is actually supposed to be an encyclopedia, not the sum of all information about every topic. If we have a policy "not a dictionary" how much less should WP be a data base of all words of all languages? Kitfoxxe (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is scope for these sort of articles here, for example List of English words of Chinese origin, but not with languages this closely related - unless people from the Spanish language wikipedia would like to develop it into a higher quality list of course. Bienfuxia (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree totally that WP "is not paper" so there is room for anything. However that kind of thing is really more like a data base than an encyclopedia, however interesting it is to browse. Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Should we have articles on Korean words of Aztec origin or Finnish words of Arabic origin or the many thousands of other combinations? Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone want to discuss Icelandic exonyms etc again? —Tamfang (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not really because "I like it" and "It's important to me" trumps "WP is an encyclopedia" almost every time. However I will drag myself to nominate the list of Chinese words in English. Watch for the AfD soon. Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]