Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 24
 |
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Kutalik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Based on the edit history this article seems to have been mainly written by the article's subject WP:COISELF Acebarry (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Acebarry (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A few articles he's written turn up in Gnews, but that's about all I find. I don't find mention of any games he's designed. Oaktree b (talk) 01:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Games, and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete possible CV bio, fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 11:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete while there a few hits on stuff he himself has written, I can't really find anything in terms of WP:SIGCOV on the subject himself. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence this passes the WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO Chetsford (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I find stuff he's written, but I don't find any discussion about him by others. I don't see how that fulfills any notability standard. Jacona (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 04:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Avalum Naanum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the general and television-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. UtherSRG (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The independent non-interview sources are from The Times of India, which is only borderline reliable. However, the The Indian Express can be considered reliable. (Other sources like 5 and 11 are reliable). DareshMohan (talk) 09:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Plenty of RS. This MeToo related incident makes it notable. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: : Source from Dinamalar [1], The Times of India [2], [3]--P.Karthik.95 (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.