Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The world of the shining prince

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- This is a book review, not an encyclopedic article.. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 04:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- looks copied and pasted. Bearly541 05:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, probable copyvio. MER-C 06:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yup, a book report not an encyclopaedia article. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. -- IslaySolomon | talk 07:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per MER-C. — Rickyrab | Talk 16:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, because whatever. Sockpuppet of Rickyrab
What, me worry? Sockpuppet of Rickyrab
No, keep, I disagree with the rest of you sockpuppets of Rickyrab. Sockpuppet of Rickyrab
Delete - All your base are belong to us. Sockpuppet of Rickyrab
Comment - Which one is your authentic vote? It's on record that users can only vote once. Yet you came in and started a fake sockpuppet argument! Sockpuppet of Rickyrab 18:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The top one. — Rickyrab | Talk 18:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]