Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carnildo (talk | contribs) at 19:54, 18 November 2023 (→‎SpaceX Starship). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Tadej Pogačar in June 2022
Tadej Pogačar

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

November 18

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


SpaceX Starship

Article: SpaceX Starship Second Integrated Flight Test (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ SpaceX Starship launches, becoming the most powerful rocket in history. (Post)
Alternative blurb: SpaceX Starship launches before losing communication, becoming the most powerful rocket ever launched
Alternative blurb II: ​ SpaceX successfully launches Starship to orbit, before losing communication.
Credits:

The most powerful rocket ever launched. In the last test flight, the ship exploded before reaching orbit or even separating. In this test flight, all 33 engines survived (the most amount of engines ever on a rocket), a brand new hot-staging system managed to successfully separate Starship and Super Heavy, and orbit was reached. An incredible milestone in the history of human flight, not to mention being front page news almost everywhere. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support once article quality improves a bit (more information is being released). Clearly ITN and despite the test not reaching all of it's stated objectives, it's a huge achievement which represents a significant milestone towards colonizing the solar system. Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not opposed to posting any sort of space exploration items on ITN, but given the grand picture of what would be required, I have a hard time reading your claim of a significant milestone as anything other than hyperbole. Perhaps you could elaborate further on your point and on how you perceive the significance of this item. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 15:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    SpaceX Starship is the largest and most powerful rocket in history by virtually every metric, and is set to return humans to the Moon as part of the Artemis program. This is a big step forward in spaceflight. Not only that, but the amount of news coverage alone and reader interest is enough to make this notable. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a rocket that has yet to succeed and hasn't actually taken a payload; its capabilities for doing almost everything promised are still on-paper; very much the "hyperbole" that Walt mentioned. By which metric, no, it's far, far from the "most powerful," since Sea Dragon comes to mind... Or any of the post-Apollo Nova concepts. Raw coverage & interest alone doesn't merit posting every single failure; this is ITN, not a corporate press release office. - Nottheking (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the articles that I see covering this say that it exploded shortly after reaching space, and considered a failure. eg [1], [2]. Masem (t) 14:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also not seeing how ITNR works here. This was the second test of that rocket model, so even granting that SpaceX being its own "country", that first ITNR for space exploration doesn't work. Masem (t) 14:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... - As Masem said, the spacecraft went kablooey again. Now if that was understood and considered to be part of the mission objectives, then okay; but from what I understood, one of the primary objectives was to conduct a partial orbit and it was not able to reach orbit insertion. The mission profile was an hour and a half long, and it got only eight minutes into its flight plan. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 14:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, also Not ITN/R How is this substantially different from the first flight test? Getting all 33 engines to light & separated appears to be all that changed from the first test flight. Which also brings to the point of claiming ITN/R; if we go and check, we see just three criteria:
  • A country conducting its first successful indigenous orbital launch
  • The launch of space stations or installation of new major components thereof
  • Arrival of spacecraft (to lunar orbit and beyond) at their destinations
This does not fit under any such category. While I am assuming good faith that the poster thought that a deprecated criteria still existed, ("first and last launch of any rocket") this likewise isn't even the first such test. Since we have prior events to go on, it wouldn't be surprising if this is followed by yet more failed tests in 2024; posting this would basically indicate that Wikipedia intends to post every single failure, at which point ITN becomes more of a press release office for a private company. - Nottheking (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the two votes above. Unmanned launches aren’t much of a milestone anymore, and it’s not even the first test of this specific rocket. The Kip 17:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Already posted the launch of the rocket system once (probably should not have) and nothing significant enough has happened to denote every minor error correction from the former on ITN. Gotitbro (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: the flight was not successful, and no major records (such as "largest non-nuclear explosion") were set. The only records set on this flight were "most engines ever lit at takeoff" and "tallest rocket ever launched". It didn't achieve the primary mission objectives, so the Saturn V still holds the title of "largest rocket ever successfully launched". --Carnildo (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Karl Tremblay

Article: Karl Tremblay (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Journal de Québec
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Roncanada (talk) 05:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gohar Ayub Khan

Article: Gohar Ayub Khan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Fahads1982 (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) ChatGPT maker OpenAI ousted its own founder from the company

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Sam Altman (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI which created ChatGPT, was ousted by the company as CEO. The board said it lost confidence in him. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters / Bloomberg
Credits:

Article updated
 HolyCrocsEmperor (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural oppose substandard blurb. not written in the correct tense and its written as two sentences. Substantive oppose changes of CEO are not significant enough for ITN. JM (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hatted WP:NOTFORUM support !vote.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 17

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


Everton F.C.

Proposed image
Past Everton F.C. league positions
Article: Everton F.C. (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Everton F.C. receive a 10-point deduction from the Premier League, the biggest in the competition’s history. (Post)
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This is the biggest point deduction in Premier League history. ITN obliviously needed. Equalwidth (C) 08:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose The blurb doesn't explain this and neither does the article update. It seems that it has something to do with the club losing money but it's a curious sport that penalises you for that. Me, I'm more interested in the 10 grid penalty given to Carlos Sainz in the Las Vegas Grand Prix but so it goes... Andrew🐉(talk) 09:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose How is it "obviously" needed? It's one team losing points in a country-wide competition. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no bolded article, no article about the topic, the only line about this in either article is one single line within a large unrelated section of the first article, a non-ITN/R sporting event... and isn't notable enough for ITN. JM (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's one point more than the previous record for Portsmouth in 2010, so the headlines of biggest deduction in history are true but not groundbreaking. [4] We still don't know if it will be enough to take Everton down in May next year, and that's not a notable thing either as three teams go down every year. The real thing will be whether the 115 charges against Manchester City are proven and whether they are stripped of all their trophies in that timeframe. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per all above. Simply doesn’t meet the bar for ITN blurbing. The Kip 17:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Liberian general election

Proposed image
Joseph Boakai
Article: 2023 Liberian general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Joseph Boakai (pictured) is elected President of Liberia. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Joseph Boakai (pictured) is elected President of Liberia in the runoff, defeating incumbent president George Weah.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Incumbent has conceded, remarkably well run for a run-off in Liberia as EU described it. BastianMAT (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, especially alt blurb Hoping for a peaceful transfer of power! Article seems in pretty good shape, although I'm guessing it's time to add an Aftermath or Reactions section! (As right now it finishes with the table-heavy results, maybe a bit of prose or analysis by sources?) ChaotıċEnby(talk) 01:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support original blurb ITN/R, good enought article, original blurb is more concise JM (talk) 02:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt blurb. Makes sense to point out that the incumbent was defeated here. estar8806 (talk) 02:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 16

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: A. S. Byatt

Article: A. S. Byatt (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

English writer. Her article is lengthy and well referenced. Moscow Mule (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Thomas J. Bliley Jr.

Article: Thomas J. Bliley Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WTVR
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former congressman and mayor from Richmond, Virginia. Needs source work and prose expansion. Curbon7 (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Pedro Sánchez reelected as Spain's prime minister

Proposed image
Article: 2023 Spanish government formation (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Pedro Sánchez is re-elected as the prime minister of Spain following the 2023 Spanish general election in July. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Four months after the July 2023 general election, Pedro Sánchez is reelected as the prime minister of Spain.
Alternative blurb II: Pedro Sánchez is re-elected as the prime minister of Spain, after making a deal that extended amnesty to members of the Catalan independence movement.
News source(s): [6][7][8][9]
Credits:

Normally I wouldn't nominate something like this as I would probably consider it to have been covered by the posting for the election. The election was posted in July [10], but it rolled off of ITN after a couple hours. Changes in head of government are also WP:ITN/R, though not as part of a general election, hence I didn't list this as ITN/R. Though, considering that it's been several months since the general election and the article for that rolled off relatively quickly, I figured this should have a chance. estar8806 (talk) 23:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, excellent article and we haven't had a blurb in over a week. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 23:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above Lukt64 (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Extremely Weak Support Taking note that Sanchez's BLP makes no reference to the scandalous circumstances under which he was able to secure the needed support to remain in power. That's a huge miss in an article about a head of government. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The govt formation article is good enough, and a clean-shaven gent in a nice shirt and tie could replace Mr. Nascar / Wabash / Ford Motor Co. Moscow Mule (talk) 00:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If image change is all that is wanted, the Myanmar article has some. And do not really a problem enough with Blaney to base of the notability of this on that alone. Gotitbro (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I wasn't supporting the Sánchez nom just to get rid of Blaney; the story of the four-month negotiations and the PSOE succeeding where the PP couldn't stands on its own merits. And there's an AltBlurb still to be written that succinctly captures that. Moscow Mule (talk) 13:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - we posted this as part of a general election, and the head of government did not, in fact, change, because he was reelected. --RockstoneSend me a message! 03:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Yes, Pedro Sánchez was and still is PM of Spain, but I think this story is more then just about Sánchez, it's about a multi-month government formation. I'd be fine redacting the mention of the election itself for this reason. And, as much as I hate to be the guy who pulls this card, but I think the slow news cycle does make this a little more reasonable to post. DarkSide830 (talk) 04:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt1 Support Alt2; just because it's ITN/R to post an election OR appointment of a PM doesn't mean we can't post the end of the months-long struggle for the reelection of a PM outside of ITN/R. JM (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt government formation months after election, will be of interest to readers. Polyamorph (talk) 06:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurbs The currently proposed blurbs give the impression that this is just business as usual. But when we ran this before, we posted the picture of a different party leader because their party got the most votes. And so the King gave them the first crack at forming a government but their vote of confidence failed to pass. Sanchez then got a chance and the real news is that he's got further by doing a controversial deal with Catalan separatists. So, any blurb for this needs to summarise why our previous selection didn't work out and how this one has. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This was pretty big news, but as the above comments mention, it's mostly notable because of the investiture coalition he formed. I'd propose ALT2 "Pedro Sánchez is reelected as the prime minister of Spain, after making a deal that extended amnesty to members of the Catalan independence movement". --Grnrchst (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Neither the blurb nor the article itself actually covers the controversial circumstances surrounding his re-election - and if you look at the news stories, that is ITN rather than the re-election itself. Black Kite (talk) 10:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated article is quite extensive and includes sections such as 2023 Spanish government formation#Reactions to amnesty and PSOE–Junts alliance. What more are you expecting? Andrew🐉(talk) 11:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT 2 per @Grnrchst. The formation of the government is notable in addition to the election itself (already posted) - but it is only notable because of the historic nature of the deal made. That's what is ITN worthy and it therefore needs to be in the blurb. FlipandFlopped 15:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very undecided I've never been in favour of blurbing the results of the same electoral process first and then who has become prime minister. I'm not convinced by the idea of including something about amnesty in the blurb. There is no doubt that the amnesty proposal has generated a worsening of the tension and mistrust in the country (the rejection of the most important associations of judges and magistrates, bar associations, state lawyers and other actors involved in the Spanish judiciary; the subtle request for a coup d'état by more than 50 retired military commanders and the recent riots in the streets of Madrid), but it's just a political investiture agreement that, I believe, will not have much of a future (absolute majority in the Senate of the opposition party and a possible challenge before the Constitutional Court). Perhaps we can talk about it if it becomes a reality... _-_Alsor (talk) 18:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted ALT2. The blurb is quite long and I encourage further discussion regarding shortening that. Schwede66 22:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe we could change "after making a deal that extended amnesty to members of the Catalan independence movement" to "after extending amnesty to Catalan independentists"? Same information content but slightly shorter. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 22:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    "Separatists" would be a better (and shorter) word than the somewhat unusual "independentists". Black Kite (talk) 00:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. I've changed it to read "after extending amnesty to [[Catalan independence movement|Catalan separatists]]". Schwede66 00:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Current blurb is okay except I think it wasn't worth it to remove "making a deal" for the sake of brevity, readers who aren't familiar with parliamentary systems might read this as some weird non-NPOV point we've decided to make. Maybe change to something like, Pedro Sánchez is re-elected as the prime minister of Spain, in a coalition agreement that extends amnesty to Catalan separatists. Davey2116 (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Support this proposed revision JM (talk) 01:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, makes it more clear how the parliamentary coalition process worked. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Why was this posted? I don't think there was consensus for it. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 04:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Even with a simple number count, at the time you added this comment the discussion was at 10-3-1. I would also say that there are only two true opposes, with the other concerned only with the blurb formulation, versus only one "extremely weak support". I see a clear consensus and endorse Schwede66's post. Ed [talk] [OMT] 05:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the current blurb is highly confusing. It says he was re-elected, yet the article linked is about government formation. The election was ages ago and we already posted it. Should be reworded to reflect what's actually in the news, i.e. That he made a deal and has now formed a coalition etc. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 07:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    He was not re-elected as PM in the general election, because PMs are not elected in general elections. He was re-elected in the sense that the Cortes Generales finally approve of him being PM again after months of failures. JM (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ken Squier

Article: Ken Squier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [11], [12]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American motorsports announcer best known for his longstanding affiliation with NASCAR.

Needs expansion. thrashbandicoot01 (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Neville Garrick

Article: Neville Garrick (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [13]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Needs expansion. Polyamorph (talk) 06:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 15

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and incidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Worta McCaskill-Stevens

Article: Worta McCaskill-Stevens (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [14]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Physician-scientist and medical oncologist.

2023 Doda bus accident

Article: 2023 Doda bus accident (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  A bus crash kills 39 and injures 19 in Jammu and Kashmir, India. (Post)
News source(s): The Times of India
Credits:

A bus crash with a rather high fatality rate; it got its own article, and ITN is very un-dynamic right now. JM (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rwanda asylum plan

Proposed image
Article: Rwanda asylum plan (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rules the government's Rwanda asylum plan to be unlawful. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated

Country-level politics, but with far reaching implications. Plus, we haven't had a new blurb in more than a week. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 00:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: its the cancellation of an international cross-continental exchange program established by two national governments. And we need dynamism in ITN, not the same four blurbs for over a week straight. JM (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We cannot force the creation of news so this dynamism argument is invalid. Masem (t) 05:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We cannot force the creation of news, but I think we can lower the high high standards of newsworthiness at ITN just a little bit in order to have a corresponding raise in dynamism. This is the latter, not the former. JM (talk) 05:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    How are we forcing the creation of news? Is this not already on the front page of many significant news outlets? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I am simply saying say that "ITN has been stale" is not a valid reason to promote blurbs. Nothing about this specific blurb, just the argument in general. Masem (t) 12:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed, but I do think there's a case to be made. The purpose of ITN is to direct viewers to relevant articles to current news items. Even if there's a slow news week, we should seek to keep up with current stories as much as possible, which could potentially mean lowering our (rather arbitrary I'd argue) standards of notability in order to best serve readers. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - In The News, major international agreement. I do think that there is a good case @JM2023 is making here, while we shouldn't post this solely because the current blurbs are stale, it is a factor. We should keep up with what is in the news, even if its a slow news week (which is becoming an increasingly rare occurance these days lol). PrecariousWorlds (talk) 05:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Migrant and refugee issues are ongoing everywhere. For example, Finland is closing its border with Russia for this reason. So, if we cover this, it should be done in a more general encyclopedic way, rather than cherry-picking one incident. And the UK ruling is not the last word as the government is now planning to pass emergency legislation and this will likely be tested by further legal action. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point. Perhaps there's some way we can combine all of these migration issues into a blurb? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Wouldn't that be WP:SYNTH? Just propose the Finland border closure as another blurb. JM (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    At this point I might just want to propose it, although I'm not sure it would fare too well. Something like the Rwanda asylum plan is on a much higher notability level than a "simple" border closing. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 01:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I proposed the Indian bus crash knowing it would probably not get consensus to post just to give an oppurtunity for a new blurb, but it's up to you. I have no plans to propose it. JM (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, I've looked at the article, it's not even a full border closing, only some checkpoints. That definitely can't be put on the same level, you can't use routine stuff to argue that a much more notable event is "cherry-picked". ChaotıċEnby(talk) 01:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Finland was given as an example because it had just been reported in the news. But it is not isolated and the point of the other source is that such events are widespread and common. For more examples, I just search the news to turn up the following reports from within the last 24 hours:
Rohingya refugees reach western Indonesia on decrepit boat
Inside a Lebanese refugee camp...
Hundreds of Afghans evacuated from Pakistan ‘dumped’ in military bases...
Refugees in PNG told they will be evicted next week ...
Andrew🐉(talk) 09:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that it was an example, no need to be condescending about it. My point was that it's a bad example, and that you can't just put anything related to refugees on the same level. What's newsworthy was the plan itself, not "something related to refugees happened", which is why you can't really compare it to random other examples.
Two events aren't close to being of the same importance just because they both have "refugee" in the title. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 10:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated issue is quite minor as these things go. It concerned a flight of just seven people and the ruling was just an administrative issue: "there had not been a proper assessment of whether Rwanda was safe". So, the government will just make that assessment and back it up with further agreements and legislation as necessary. The operation will continue and the lawyers will continue to bicker about it but it's quite a small impact when you consider that about 1% of the world's population is displaced -- over 80 million people. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is a significant change in cross-continental policy. If this is not noteworthy enough for ITN, especially on a slow news week, I don't know what is. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: N. Sankaraiah

Article: N. Sankaraiah (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Wire
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Indian Politican Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Peter Seidler

Article: Peter Seidler (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [15]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Muboshgu (talkcontribs) 19:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Subrata Roy

Article: Subrata Roy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): IE
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Indian businessman who founded Sahara India Pariwar.The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ociel Baena

Article: Ociel Baena (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): (The Guardian) (NBC News) (BBC News) )(El País)
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Tragic death of an important figure at the local level. Ornithoptera (talk) 08:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wait article was created after this person died. brings the subjects notability for having an article into question. could be nominated for deletion soon. JM (talk) 13:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:JUDGE, they're likely notable. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 15:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and perhaps tangential, but the article says they dont know if it was homicide or accident and theres no evidence of third-party entry so "tragic killing" is speculative JM (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same deal with Vivian Silver, which is marked "Ready" below. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article in a very good shape and well-sourced. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 09:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Title of the submission has been changed to their full name, why? Shouldn't it be their preferred name (which matches with the article title) instead? ChaotıċEnby(talk) 17:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reply. Not true. I changed the target article following a page move (discussed on its talk page) in this edit, but the original nomination used the full legal name from the outset, and that I didn't touch. Maybe it was a breach of protocol to change the target article; apols if that's the case, I just wanted to skip a redirect. Moscow Mule (talk) 21:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reply Thank you for the heads up @Chaotic Enby:, at the time I had nominated the article, a variety of news sources that I had seen their name referred with using their deadname. For example, The Guardian's "Jesús Ociel Baena, who used they/them pronouns, was celebrated across Latin America for their work to advance the rights of the LGBTQ+ community" and I had thus presumed that was their preferred name. Since that information is now outdated I will update the RD nomination to reflect their preferred name. Ornithoptera (talk) 21:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Don Walsh

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Don Walsh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://news.usni.org/2023/11/13/retired-navy-capt-don-walsh-deep-sea-submariner-and-ocean-explorer-dies-at-92
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
 Yeti-Hunter (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Snowclose due to what Yeti-Hunter has just said JM (talk) 05:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Ready) RD: Tengiz Kitovani

Article: Tengiz Kitovani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: One of the leaders of the 1991–1992 Georgian coup d'état. I see that the article is in good condition. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Vivian Silver

Article: Vivian Silver (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/israel-gaza-vivian-silver-1.7027333 , https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/missing-peace-activist-confirmed-to-have-been-killed-in-oct-7-hamas-onslaught/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Israeli peace activist, died on October 7 but not identified until recently ForsythiaJo (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing: Myanmar civil war

Article: Myanmar civil war (2021–present) (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Irrawady
Credits:

Nominator's comments: On top of the currently blurbed Operation 1027, there is also the simultaneous Operation 1107, and the rapid changes and announcements of new operations are a better fit for an Ongoing nomination. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 22:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support after blurb rolls off - Per Kip, unless any significant major events happen before then PrecariousWorlds (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 ☎️ 📄 13:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support at rolloff per above Lukt64 (talk) 13:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: M. Russell Ballard

Article: M. Russell Ballard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): KSL, Fox 13 Utah
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: President of the Quorum of the 12 Apostles in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints TheTubaTitan (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sufficiently news worthy passing 2601:681:0:470:DDB2:C459:6FEA:D73B (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Newsworthiness is irrelevant to RDs. Newsworthiness is only relevant to blurbs. Yet another reason why they should be split apart. JM (talk) 23:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Maryanne Trump Barry

Article: Maryanne Trump Barry (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former U.S. federal judge (1983–1999, 1999–2011), and sister of Donald Trump. Davey2116 (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I did a quick scan and the article seems fine. Unlike most RD articles this one seems to be OK (because the proximity of the subject to a very controversial and divisive political figure makes it interesting to various editors probably) JM (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Adequate for RD. Moscow Mule (talk) 17:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) UK cabinet reshuffle

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Proposed image
Articles: Sunak ministry (talk · history · tag) and November 2023 British cabinet reshuffle (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former UK PM David Cameron (pictured) returns as Foreign Secretary as Rishi Sunak reshuffles his cabinet. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, CNBC, DW, France24, NYT, Washington Post
Credits:
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Big news as Sunak re-aligns and reshuffles his cabinet. The return of Cameron seems quite a surprising and significant development. As mentioned below, "a week is a long time in politics". Andrew🐉(talk) 13:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cabinet reshuffles are not ITN-worthy. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 16:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose although interesting to see British politicians continue to act like they're all in The Thick of It, a cabinet reshuffle is not significant, and a former head of government who quit way back in 2016 taking a new, different, lesser job in 2023 is not significant. JM (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - don't understand some of the opposes here. Unlike most of the rubbish that gets featured on ITN, this is historic, and most importanly, encyclopaedic - Cameron coming back, Braverman being sacked again and Sunak gearing up for an election will shape the next decade of British politics if this delivers a Labour win. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 17:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If? Aaron Liu (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Isn't the Labour win a foregone conclusion? ITN isn't a UK news ticker and shouldn't become one just because the Tories keep finding dumber ways to create news. AryKun (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    will shape the next decade of British politics if this delivers a Labour win.
    WP:CRYSTAL. If we’re posting this because of what it might do, now that’s rubbish. The Kip 18:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Major changes at two of the Great Offices of State. And because blue man drives car faster than anyone else has been up there getting free advertising for five days. Moscow Mule (talk) 17:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Just because Brits call them the Great Offices doesn't make them great. Every country has the exact same offices and replaces the people occupying them frequently; what makes the UK doing this in any way notable and not just DYK trivia? AryKun (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Most people in the UK could not give a flying fig about this "news". Let alone the rest of the world. Polyamorph (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Domestic level politics and not a significant enough event to merit ITN blurbing - cabinet shuffles are not an unusual event. I often feel that accusations of “pro-American/British bias” on ITN are badly exaggerated, but posting this would indeed be a prime example of said bias - we would almost certainly never consider posting the same for any other country. The Kip 17:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is the seventh new foreign secretary and seventh new home secretary since Brexit, and the second time in just over a year that the same woman has left in controversy. Yes Cameron is recognisable, but were John Kerry and Hillary Clinton posted as recognisable new secretaries? This would not be even suggested for posting if it was in a non-Anglophone country of similar population and influence such as France or Germany, or probably even if it were in India or China Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The only interesting thing about this is the Government being so devoid of actual talent that it needed to bring back Cameron over 349 other MPs, I bet they are really happy. Oh, and a minister for anti-wokeness. You couldn't make it up. Actually, I'm making it sound newsworthy. It isn't. Black Kite (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Post-Closing Support - It seems strange that for a section literally called 'In The News' we don't seem to cover what is actually in the news often. We're not a UK Politics ticker, instead we have become a 'Tragic Disasters and Sports' ticker. Can anyone please tell me with a straight face that the Japan Baseball Series is more notable and generated more coverage than this? See you next week for the Uzbekistan Darts Championship or whatever we post next instead of something actually useful to the general reader PrecariousWorlds (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and incidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(NEW) India tunnel collapse

Article: 2023 Uttarakhand tunnel collapse (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An underground tunnel in Uttarakhand, India collapses, trapping 40 workers. (Post)
News source(s): [16][17]
Credits:

Yes, the original incident happened several days ago, but it was not nominated/posted. Seems to be garnering a lot of worldwide coverage, especially around the ongoing rescue efforts. Natg 19 (talk) 21:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) First successful eye transplantation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Eye transplantation (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United States, surgeons at the NYU Langone Health have announced the first successful eye transplantation. (Post)
News source(s): WaPo - BBC - Smithsonian - France24 - The Guardian
Credits:
Nominator's comments: NYU surgeons have just completed the first eye transplant in a watershed moment for the sciences. The article is in an infantile state, however, it definitely meets the last two points of WP:ITNPURPOSE and needs to be highlighted. — Knightoftheswords 19:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on the basis that this was initially misleading. It isn't as notable if it is only cosmetic and the eye itself doesn't function. Centuries123 (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality, support on notability per above. Genuinely significant medical breakthrough. The Kip 21:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • The more I read about it, the more it seems this is a misleading story; it's uncertain whether the patient will actually regain sight in the eye, making this effectively an advancement in cosmetic surgery rather than the breakthrough I initially believed it was. As such, switching vote to oppose. The Kip 05:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose if nothing else but on quality. Lot of work still needed with the article. But I will say, if this is indeed a "watershed" moment in medicine, the article should make this clear. But from a surface-level perspective, the patient in question can't see with the new eye. I think this story becomes more more notable if that happens. DarkSide830 (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, cosmetic surgery, being blown out of proportion by the media, the eye cannot see. Stephen 22:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work It seems that that it was more of a face transplant. The eye seems mainly cosmetic and the chances of vision in it seem uncertain and small. And it can't said to be successful until some time has passed to check for rejection and/or recovery. Also note that eye transplants have been done in other creatures before and so we'd need to make it clear that this is for humans, if claiming a first. See here for some history. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC) (edit conflict)[reply]
  • Oppose misleading; the transplanted eye is not a functional organ; it's an advancement in face transplantion rather than a revolution in opthalmology. JM (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I agree with JM2023, very misleading. According to the article linked, the recipient Aaron James hadn't even regained sight in that eye and the optic nerve isn't even communicating with his brain. Sure, it's an advancement in face transplantation just like JM2023 pointed out, but in no way is this really revolutionary. TwistedAxe [contact] 12:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and incidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Roman Čechmánek

Article: Roman Čechmánek (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NHL, IIHF
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Czech former NHL goaltender. Gone way too young. Article needs a lot of work. The Kip 17:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now Work is needed in citations, merging the bulleted lists into prose, and proofreading the prose (I noticed "an embarrassing 8–0 loss" as one phrase to fix) – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments: He was already an established goalie in the Czech Republic when he joined the NHL at the age of 29 in 2000. With so many lines of pre-2000 stats in the stats table on this wikipage, having just a single sentence in the prose to summarize his pre-NHL career does not seem to be adequate coverage. The medal table also indicated that he won two medals representing his country as a junior, but his junior career was not in the prose either. --PFHLai (talk) 06:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Raphael Dwamena

Article: Raphael Dwamena (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.dw.com/en/ghana-footballer-raphael-dwamena-dies-after-on-field-collapse/a-67376776
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Ghanaian professional footballer. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 12:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Muhammad Azam Khan (civil servant)

Article: Muhammad Azam Khan (civil servant) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Dawn, Tribune
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 07:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Two entire paragraphs including a section are unsourced 67.80.40.19 (talk) 22:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Iceland earthquakes

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 Iceland earthquakes (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)
News source(s): Iceland Meteorological Office The Guardian
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Article needs substantial further work before ready so I recommend waiting, however the IMO has reported thata volcanic eruption is likely in next few days. [osunpokeh/talk/contributions] 06:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Ongoing: War in Sudan

Article: War in Sudan (2023) (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/11/09/sudan-civil-war-humanitarian-crisis/
Credits:

Nominator's comments: The war seems to be massively escalating again, with the RSF on the verge of capturing Darfur and an ongoing genocide in the same region, I believe this needs to be added back. Lukt64 (talk) 01:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the 2023 Israel–Hamas war began, the media & public have become much less interested in all the other current wars, so none of them are likely to receive major coverage daily for weeks. Does the current increase in violence mean that there's a Second Battle of Geneina this month? Jim 2 Michael (talk) 20:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The new escalation in Geneina is the 2023 Darfur genocide. Also, just because theres no major media coverage doesnt mean its not a big deal. Thats like saying that the Myanmar War isnt a big deal. It is. Lukt64 (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's mostly about the war in Gaza, but more because the other wars (in Sudan, Myanmar, Ukraine and Ethiopia) had mostly stalled at that moment, and recent developments in Sudan and Myanmar will likely impact their respective media coverage. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 02:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the wars in Myanmar & Sudan are major, but they have never received anything like the level of international media coverage or public interest that Israel-Hamas does. The first two receive no demonstrations, whereas the latter receives hundreds. Ardamata massacre & 2023 Darfur genocide are far too short to post. Jim 2 Michael (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I would put the link to the Battle of Geneina article instead. Subaru2000 (talk) 14:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In ongoing, a battle by itself is unimportant. Lukt64 (talk) 16:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! But just saying that we should atleast list it somewhere on the box, such as on the blurb. Because the Masalit genocide in Darfur in centered around the whole battle. Subaru2000 (talk) 17:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : surprised that there isnt any opposes Lukt64 (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Just because a new theatre of a war opens doesn't automatically mean notability. If this makes headlines, then we should post a blurb. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: