Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 207: Line 207:
* Posting, nice work with fixing the refs! --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
* Posting, nice work with fixing the refs! --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


====RD: Luchita Hurtado====
==== (Posted) RD: Luchita Hurtado====
{{ITN candidate
{{ITN candidate
| article = Luchita Hurtado
| article = Luchita Hurtado
Line 221: Line 221:
:{{ping|Destroyeraa}} '''Comment''' It appears that further details and sources have been included. --[[User:NoonIcarus|NoonIcarus]] ([[User talk:NoonIcarus|talk]]) 12:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Destroyeraa}} '''Comment''' It appears that further details and sources have been included. --[[User:NoonIcarus|NoonIcarus]] ([[User talk:NoonIcarus|talk]]) 12:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' {{emdash}} looks fine to me. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 16:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' {{emdash}} looks fine to me. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 16:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Lead needs to summarize her life beyond one sentence.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 17:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''<s>Oppose</s>''' Lead needs to summarize her life beyond one sentence.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 17:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
:*{{re|Bagumba}} Fixed now. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 01:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
:*{{re|Bagumba}} Fixed now. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 01:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as the problem Bagumba noted has been fixed, look ok for RD now [[User:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:green">''JW 1961''</span>]] [[User talk:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:#0000CD">''Talk''</span>]] 10:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as the problem Bagumba noted has been fixed, look ok for RD now [[User:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:green">''JW 1961''</span>]] [[User talk:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:#0000CD">''Talk''</span>]] 10:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
*{{Added|Posted}}—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 11:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


==== (Closed for now) Borisov pledges to resign ====
==== (Closed for now) Borisov pledges to resign ====

Revision as of 11:18, 16 August 2020

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Donald Trump official portrait
Donald Trump

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

August 16

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • MV Wakashio oil spill
    • Mauritius says it will seek "compensation from the owner and the insurer" of MV Wakashio, which broke apart the previous day after leaking hundreds of tonnes of fuel oil. The Japanese company in charge of the ship pledged to compensate for the damage. (BBC News)

Health and environment

International relations

Politics and elections

(Closed) RD: Robert Trump

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Robert Trump (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC & CNN as of writing (story just broke); likely will be others following suit
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
 2601:187:4581:7F50:658E:ECFC:60C2:7B99 (talk) 02:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 15

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

MV Wakashio Breaks Apart

Article: MV Wakashio oil spill (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Japanese bulk carrier MV Wakashio, which stranded on a reef in Mauritius last month, breaks in half. Scientists call it the biggest environmental disaster ever in Mauritius. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Grounded Japanese bulk carrier MV Wakashio breaks apart on the coast of Mauritius portending an ecological disaster for the region.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Grounded Japanese bulk carrier MV Wakashio breaks apart on the coast of Mauritius after spilling around 1,000 tonnes of oil into the Indian Ocean.
News source(s): (Reuters)
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: While the grounding of the bulk carrier happened a while back, the ship didn't physically break apart until today. The ecological impact are likely going to be massive including clean-up costs. Also Mauritius relies on heavy tourism for its economy, which will undoubted by impacted even notwitstanding the pandemic. Albertaont (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Masem, I tell you that the impact of the spill takes months and years to assess, not only how much effect in environment, but also in society, economy, and many more, that is relevant given Mauritius was badly impacted by COVID-19 as the economy heavily relies on tourism. 180.245.101.217 (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In contrast to when this ran aground, when there was an affirmed estimate of how many gallons of oil that spilled into the waters, here, the oil has been removed, all that's left is fuel, and they aren't sure if thats' leaking, and compared to the oil, there's a far less finite supply of that. Yes, if it all spilled, it would be a problem. They will be able to estimate how much of that fuel spilled within a day or so, which would be sufficient if it was significant quantities. But right now, the story is the fear that this fuel could spill, and thus could cause problems. That's speculation, which we don't post. --Masem (t) 04:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blurbs are added and removed based entirely on the date of the event. We don't give preference to certain blurbs over others in terms of how long they stay up. Sometimes blurbs can linger for weeks when ITN is slow. And sometimes they come and go in days. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and remove the most important thing happening in Europe right now. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 04:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Murtaja Baseer

Article: Murtaja Baseer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Daily Bangladesh, The Business Standard
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Bangladeshi painter, died from COVID complications. Short but sourced. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 17:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) MS Dhoni

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: MS Dhoni (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ MS Dhoni announces retirement from international cricket (Post)
News source(s): hindustantimes
Credits:

Article updated
 Indian cricketer retire from international cricket Mr.Mani Raj Paul - talk 15:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) New 5000 metres world record

Proposed image
Articles: Joshua Cheptegei (talk · history · tag) and 5000 metres world record progression (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Ugandan athlete Joshua Cheptegei (pictured) sets a new world record in the 5000 metres. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Ugandan athlete Joshua Cheptegei (pictured) sets a new world record in the 5000 metres track event in Monaco.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Ugandan athlete Joshua Cheptegei (pictured) sets a new 5000 metres world record.
News source(s): BBC, Eurosport
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: This is a notable achievement given that Bekele's record stood for 16 years – the longest duration in the history of the event. I've updated the athlete's article with a paragraph at the end and packed it together with the immediately preceding information of the same kind in a new "World records" section. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Makes sense as the athlete's article seems to be the only place where a sensible prose update can be made.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Apologies for this after-fact request.Ktin (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Julian Bream

Article: Julian Bream (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian, Classical Music
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Famous guitarist. A vital topic but just rated as start-class currently. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Weak Oppose it's almost there, just a few more in-text refs needed. Dan the Animator 19:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Luchita Hurtado

Article: Luchita Hurtado (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Venezuelan-born painter, died at 99, named to the 2019 Time 100 list of influential people. NoonIcarus (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I have to oppose because there's nothing in the article saying that she died. Also, there is a lack of sources. Support If the article is expanded and improved, then I will change my vote to support. Changing to support. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Destroyeraa: Comment It appears that further details and sources have been included. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed for now) Borisov pledges to resign

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Bulgarian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov pledges to resign and proposes amendments to the constitution amid continuing protests. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov pledges to resign if the nation's National Assembly passes his motion to call for a constituent assembly to change the nation's constitution after continued protests against him.
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Very important development in the protests. Per Slavi Trifonov, this is akin to Borisov becoming "the official leader of the protests against himself". Dan the Animator 18:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Lithuania rejects Lukashenko

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Belarus–Lithuania relations (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Lithuania becomes the first EU state to openly reject the legitimacy of Alexander Lukashenko as President of Belarus. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Following a disputed presidential election, Lithuania becomes the first EU state to openly reject the legitimacy of the 6th term of Alexander Lukashenko.
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Maybe this can be merged with the current Belarusian events that are posted? Dan the Animator 18:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) Israel–United Arab Emirates peace agreement

Article: Israel–United Arab Emirates peace agreement (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Israel and the United Arab Emirates agree to normalize relations. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Israel and the United Arab Emirates sign a peace treaty, agreeing to normalize relations and suspend the proposed annexation of the Jordan Valley.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The United Arab Emirates becomes the first Gulf Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel.
Alternative blurb III: ​ Israel and the United Arab Emirates agree to a peace deal to normalize relations.
News source(s): BBC, NYTimes, WAPost
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Developing. Breaking news. Sherenk1 (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Destroyeraa I changed the target article. It is a decently long article. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 17:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to Support per others. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 20:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Note as per BBC: The agreement marks only the third Israel-Arab peace deal since Israel's declaration of independence in 1948. Egypt signed a deal in 1979, and Jordan in 1994.Sherenk1 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sherenk1 and also the 3rd Arab country to establish diplomatic relations/official recognition or Israel. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 16:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They haven't signed a treaty yet, even if they intend to. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Masem no, Israel is agreeing to delay/pause/freeze any territorial acquisitions/annexation of the West bank (namely the Jordan Valley). The accord does not mean Israel won't annex Jordan Valley, it just means it will be delayed until further notice. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 17:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Orbitalbuzzsaw I think it may be possible to put all of them up at the same time; no removing necessary. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 23:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dantheanimator} If that's possible it would be good; you could also get rid of the golf line. I've only ever seen 4 articles at a time on ITN though so IDK. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Orbitalbuzzsaw I would imagine that the reason the admins don't post more than 4 usually is for lack of space but considering that 1 of the events, the PGA win, is only 1 line long, I think that may make just enough extra space for 1 extra 1-line event. You're probably right though, they're probably going to remove 1 of the events (preferably the PGA win, in my opinion). Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 01:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't it be "The United Arab Emirates" not "United Arab Emirates"? This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, good catch Orbitalbuzzsaw. Fixed it just now. Dan the Animator 02:09, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I think about it, altblurb2 was indeed sensationalist as noted below. Significant nonetheless. Gotitbro (talk) 06:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: A corresponding error report has also been posted at WP:ERRORS. TribunalMan (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. As I noted at ERRORS, "agree a peace deal" seems like valid grammar to me - perhaps it's an ENGVAR thing. Anyway, "agree to" works just as well, so I've amended it to that. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 06:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's an ENGVAR issue all right. "Agree" without the "to" is British English. – Sca (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy
Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

(Posted) RD: Mac Jack

Article: Mac Jack (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Independent Online, News24
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: COVID-19 death. LefcentrerightDiscuss 21:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, lay back with the flack attack and cut Mac Jack some slack, brother! If you say they're a lot of facts, isn't that proof enough? I believe you, anyway. Any you're doubtful about to some problematic degree? I'll try to sniff out the truth, no promises though. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the dates of office and preceding/followed by are not mentioned in the prose at all and are hence unverifiable. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 07:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't realized things had gotten that bad, I'm out! InedibleHulk (talk) 07:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Stonehaven derailment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Stonehaven derailment (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Three people are killed when an HST (similar trainset pictured) is derailed near Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire, United Kingdom. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, [CNN],
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Deadliest derailment in UK since the Grayrigg derailment in 2007. Mjroots (talk) 15:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support dead people, trains, Europe: it ticks all the notability boxes. Infobox, background, aftermath/reactions section: ticks all the quality boxes. Don't delay, post today! --LaserLegs (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support: A fatal rail accident in the UK is incredibly rare since Ladbroke Grove (1999), you can count the fatal incidents on your fingers, and the ones involving infrastructure failure on one hand. International coverage seems to bear that out; it's on the top few lines of cnn.com, for example. OTOH, three deaths is a bit too low. We put Croydon in ITN, but that had double the death toll. Sceptre (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martinevans123 give me a good explanation of how this is notable. So far, it seems the main reason people support this is because: British people died in a train accident (first since 1999 for the UK). Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was suggesting it might be more notable as half the passengers were killed. I'm not sure the article tells us their nationalities. But I'm sorry, your suggestion might give offence to some editors Martinevans123 (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But just for complete clarity: "The train was carrying six three crew and six passengers. Three people died including the driver and a conductor."
Sorry if I sounded like that. I am not trying to offend anyone at all and was trying to prove my point. Maybe it might be notable for that reason but the accident itself relies more on more casualties or larger reach of impact of which, it fulfills neither. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how a rail crash is going to have "larger reach of impact". In the context of UK rail safety, this one seems to be quite notable. But I guess headlines across the work rely more on death-count. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have to go below the surface for that one. – Sca (talk) 22:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - This is now more deadly than Grayrigg (linked above) and is the deadliest rail accident in the UK since the Ladbrook Grove Rail Crash in 1999. It is major-UK news, and should be recognized by Wikipedia. Unfortunately, it seems some users are opposing it as a matter of sour-grapes because their nominations have previously been declined. AimeeSunflower (talk) 18:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AimeeSunflower this has nothing to do with my previous nom (I just brought that up as a comparison). Looking at this alone, this is a domestic accident that will be forgotten by nearly everyone by the next day and has no significance/notability outside the UK. Please take a look at some non-UK news sources, please. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dantheanimator It's on the CNN Frontpage[1], ABC News Frontpage[2], VoiceOfAmerica Front Page[3], Bloomberg[4], AlJazeera[5], ABC News Australia[6], France24[7]. It is Major Global News, it is newsworthy. AimeeSunflower (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AimeeSunflower for the CNN one, it is in small text and has no image. For ABC news, also small text, no image. For VOA, it is NOT on the front page (at least of their website). For Bloomberg, also not on front page. For Al Jazeera, you have to scroll down a bit and it's relatively smaller than the others. For ABC News (Australia), you are correct, it is the 2nd featured article. For France24, it is also relatively featured. However, for all these news websites, Harris' nomination got the most featured spot, and that won't even be posted probably. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dantheanimator it's on the VoA Front Page at https://www.voanews.com/ as part of the Headline section, with the listing as "Passenger Train Derails in Scotland; 'Serious Injuries' Reported". You've also above mentioned that you probably wouldn't see it in Indian or Chinese news, so have a Times of India[8] and South China Morning Press[9] article, to top it off. AimeeSunflower (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AimeeSunflower, I don't know where you're seeing that. I went to the homepage and in the "Headlines" section, it says Australia COVID-19 record, UN support to Beirut, Mali protests, Ethiopia tensions, and 3 dead in India. Maybe your geo-location is being used to create recommended headlines? I honestly don't know. For the India and Chinese (Hong Kong actually) sources, it is not featured/shown on Times of India and is very minor on the South China Morning Press. They obviously have articles, but their not receiving much attention. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dantheanimator on VOA's website, it's certainly there for me, you may be right as to geolocation. But with respect, you told me to look at non-UK News Sources, so I did, and provided multiple links. CNN actually covered it on TV with a Live link from a reporter of theirs in Glasgow, it is showing (for me) on the front page of multiple global news sites, it is a fatal rail crash, of significance to the Rail Industry, the UK public, and clearly global news media. The Grayrigg derailment made ITN on the day of the incident. There is precedence for this, it has made Global news, it involves fatalities, again, I emphasize, it is newsworthy and In The News. AimeeSunflower (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AimeeSunflower Yeah you did, and I appreciate it. Definitely other media sources are covering this (maybe with not as much focus though I would argue). I agree with you, it is important for the Rail Industry and the UK public. For the global news media, I still don't think it's getting the attention it should if it was that important. About Grayrigg, "X made it so Y should too" cannot be used to support this, regardless of the similarities. I have other things to do so I'll just leave it at that and we'll see how the nom plays out. Cheers, Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 19:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose doesn't seem to be quite newsworthy enough outside of the UK. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support it's been and still is headline news all day today in the UK, and as above, features prominently around the world. As noted above, fatal rail accidents in the UK are rare as rocking horse poop. And while the death toll is low here, thankfully, it's worth bearing in mind that it killed a quarter of the people on the train. Just about the only thing we can be thankful for Covid, that the train was mostly empty. This is a serious newsworthy incident which could have been dozens of times worse. Will be interesting to see what comes of the investigation as there seemed to be an awareness of flooded tracks and the potential for land slippages earlier in the morning.... The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 18:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lets discuss the Harris nom in the Harris nom
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The Rambling Man Harris' vice presidential nomination is getting significantly more coverage than this, and will likely not be posted because of alleged US bias. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dantheanimator - long-standing consensus is that VP noms and Presidential noms do not get posted. As is explained at the current nomination in plain English. Mjroots (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Likely to yet again prove that rail safety in Britain, as opposed to other well developed nations, is achieved more by luck than judgement. A very noteworthy event in the land that invented the railways, a country which is in the process of building a very expensive high speed line that uses a whole bunch of safety critical things that are entirely new to the British rail industry. Jenga Fet (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And if we ever see HS2 North of the border, I'll eat my hat. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Jenga Fet everything you said supports this because it's important in Britain. How is it important/notable OUTSIDE of Britain/UK? Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't need to be. Read the boilerplate text about nominations. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 18:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Please do not... [...] 2.oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." AimeeSunflower (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you honestly believe that our difference of opinion is because I didn't read his/her comment carefully enough? Please try to avoid snark, especially because it usually causes the recipient to double down rather than reconsider. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 23:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bzweebl: Whether you read the comment carefully or otherwise, you do appear to have misunderstood it. It means that the number of passengers on the train, and thus the number of deaths, is artificially low because of Covid-19. If significance was judged solely on the number of deaths then the comment could be construed as meaning it would have been more newsworthy had it happened 9 months ago. Of course significance is not judged by bodycount alone so the logic fails. The comment is saying that because Covid-19 and the associated movement restrictions and societal changes, etc. are a thing three deaths is more significant now than three deaths would have been this time last year. Thryduulf (talk) 23:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I actually did understand that. My point was that train accidents are less significant when not many people are riding trains. I guess I should have been more explicit. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 00:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually TRM you're right. This is over here (the link only shows for NYC, so excluding most of LIRR and other rail services in the state). Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 21:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  • Weak support Article looks good. I've read through a lot of the comments above and it seems to me that it is being covered internationally, that the notability stems from fatal train crashes being uncommon not just in the UK but in parts of the world with normally good infrastructure, and that on top of this a very high percentage of those onboard died (due to low ridership, COVID), so it's likely a more fatal incident by death rate (25%!) than most (even in countries-with-many-crashes). Weak support because I'd like to hear more opinions, though preferably not petty ones, to see if there are arguments/angles I haven't considered this from. Usually with this many comments a lot of the metrics for 'train crash' have been weighted, but so far the comments seem to be mostly different debates on UK-centrism; I'm not a train expert, if there's context/mechanics I'm missing, I'd like to hear it. Kingsif (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - We posted a bus plunging into a river in China only months ago. HSR derailments are exceedingly rare everywhere, and means something went VERY WRONG. At a minimum, service on the line is cut, and this will likely end up resulting in engineering changes to some portion of the line or train in the future.Albertaont (talk) 20:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not to argue but I remember when a LIRR train derailed last year over here. Nearly no-one in my school mentioned it the next day, it was barely in the (major not local) news, and we all just forgot about it. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 21:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
"No one injured", you think that have something to do with lack of interest? And LIRR and HST aren't really comparable either. And fatal train derailments in the UK are extremely rare in the last 20+ years. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, just realized I linked the wrong one. Sorry about that. This should be the correct one. 3 people died in it. If this is the right one, the day this happened trains got delayed for hours. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 21:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Uh, that's nothing like this. This is a derailment of a high speed train. That was a slow motion road traffic accident which killed the people in the vehicle which was stupid enough to try to run the lights at a crossing. You're not comparing apples with apples. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, just awaiting a link to another source that says "Nearly no-one in your school mentioned it the next day". Cheers. :) Martinevans123 (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, global indeed – in fact, interplanetary; it's already been in the news on Ceres, I hear. – Sca (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
👏👏👏 The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support:--UkrainianCossack (talk) 22:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for reasons given above. SK2242 (talk) 22:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've marked this for admin attention because it's clear the discussion is simply devolving into circular repetition. The basic facts are that a high-speed train derailed in the UK with fatalities for the first time in a long time, that it killed a significant proportion of those onboard a Covid-impacted train, and that it has ramifications to UK rail safety. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, Stephen removed the mark, suggesting that there was active discussion. There's discussion, but it's not productive. Never mind, what's yet another timesink in the big scheme of things? The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – We don't post everything that makes major news. When considering disasters, we should consider lasting effect and large impact. IMO, this does not appear to have that. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Major news in the UK - the most significant rail accident in the UK in over 10 years, the most deadly in over 20. As a proportion of people on the train killed/injured this is likely to be the most significant in far, far longer. As for lasting effect, this will be at least as significant as Grayrigg 13 years ago where the lessons learned are still being applied. It's too early to say precisely what those lessons will be, but it doesn't take a crystal ball to say that there most definitely will be some. In terms of major impact, how much more major do you want? [I consider myself to involved with this article to post it myself]. Thryduulf (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. A train with only 9 people on board, 3 killed, too small of an accident despite various tortured explanatious to the contrary above. Nsk92 (talk) 00:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose — pushing this reeks of UK-bias. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Agreed; we are getting into bizarre levels of UK bias here. Never before have I seen it suggested that the PROPORTION of passengers killed makes an event noteworthy. We post things because they are significant, not because they might be significant under different circumstances. GreatCaesarsGhost 01:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I counted 13 Supports and 10 Opposes. I think if 1 or 2 more people vote on this, we could either post/close. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 01:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Does not seem a homepage news article. Also, agree with some of the folks here that Proportion seems the wrong metric. In the recent aircraft incident, this metric was at less than 10pc. One would wish it was 0pc though. Anyways, not the right metric.Ktin (talk) 01:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Update - While it need not be the definitive reason, I just went to bbc.com, and this news doesn't even figure in the homepage. Ktin (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Vectaerovenator inopinatus

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: List of informally named dinosaurs (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A new species of theropod Ornithischian dinosaur called Vectaerovenator inopinatus is discovered on the Isle of Wight, England. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Palaeontologists at the University of Southampton report the discovery of a new species of theropod dinosaur called Vectaerovenator inopinatus on the Isle of Wight, England. The species belongs to the same group as the Tyrannosaurus, and modern-day birds. It lived roughly 115 million years ago during the Cretaceous period.
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: First new Dino species I've personally heard about in a while. The ITN section would also benefit from some non-political related coverage. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 17:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

(Posted) RD: Russell A. Kirsch

Article: Russell A. Kirsch (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Oregonian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 05:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sixto Brillantes

Article: Sixto Brillantes (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Manila Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Filipino election lawyer. COVID-related death TJMSmith (talk) 04:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2020 Democratic vice presidential candidate

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 2601:647:CB03:5930:1CB9:EEA9:3F27:738F (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose this seems a tad too US-centric; posting the result of the election in November is ITN/R but this, while hyped in the media in the U.S., doesn't seem appropriate to ITN to me. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Additional comment Tim Kaine wasn't posted in July 2016, and the discussion there mentions that Mike Pence wasn't posted either. Bencherlite, who closed that discussion, gave the following rationale: ITN doesn't give the results of the US presidential nominations race for the two major parties, so the name of a running mate isn't the stuff of ITN either. I think that rationale still holds. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose for now per above but will Support if Carmont derailment is posted per same reason. Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 18:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per above.
  • Oppose. Thanks for the nomination, but the choosing of a candidate for office will almost never merit posting to ITN. If they win, that will be posted. I would gently remind the nominator that this is a global project and not everyone may be familiar with the subject matter. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and snow close per precedence mentioned above and general guideline of only posting the results of U.S. elections at the federal level. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 18:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support decent article, in the news, certainly worth posting. --LaserLegs (talk) 18:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support applying some decent common sense here, and noting that ITN is supposed to be highlighting articles that people are looking for, this is an IAR moment for me. Even in the UK we're quite keen on the Biden/Harris ticket and it's been subject of some discussion here, even though it's US politics. Of course, the new POTUS will be posted, but that isn't the actual point of this nomination really, is it? The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per same reasoning as CaradhrasAiguo. Furthermore, this is not the election, nor is it even the presidential candidate we have chosen.Albertaont (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose- I could see an argument for posting a primary victory, but selecting a running-mate is obviously much less important and is getting what I'd say is an unusually large amount of coverage in the States largely because electoral politics is a nice diversion from coronavirus. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 19:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    But did we post Joe Biden's victory in the primaries? --212.74.201.229 (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Negative. The only U.S. presidential primary-related nomination was a blurb discussion about the Iowa caucuses in February that was not posted. Nothing more, which makes even less of a reason for this to be posted. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    But you agree it's in the news right? Being widely covered in the US and around the world (not required, see above, but a bonus). I mean, should we reach out to major global media outlets and advise them to stop covering the announcement because you don't think it should be in the news? --LaserLegs (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @LaserLegs: I made no mention of whether I personally thought the pick should be reported by newsmedia, but rather just referenced the fact that (a) ITN did not post anything about Biden (or anyone else, for that matter) winning any individual primary or caucus, nor about him securing enough delegates to become the Democratic nominee, and (b) that a vice-presidential pick for one of the parties in a U.S. presidential election seems lesser than that, and in my mind wouldn't merit an ITN blurb either. I doubt we'll add a blurb about Biden officially accepting the nomination next week, so I don't think a vice presidential pick would merit a blurb. Let's keep doing what we've done in the past and stick to the result of the November election, as several other users have said. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not significant, we limit to actual election results. Gotitbro (talk) 19:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support Wouldn't normally support a VP nom (Tim Kaine? Yawn) but the historic nature of Harris as the first woman of colour to be on the ticket just tips the balance.-- P-K3 (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2020 Bangalore riots

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Bangalore riots (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 3 people are killed in a riot in Bangalore, Karnataka, India. (Post)
News source(s): Newsweek, SCMP, Deutsche Welle
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: I hope this doesn't fall victim to the usual GEOBIAS. Invisible Lad (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Invisible Lad at "least 3 people are killed". How is this at all notable enough for ITN? Also, currently we have an India ITN event (and previously had 2 plus 1 Sri Lankan) and there's also 1 other Asian one so if we're going to talk about Geobias, this being nom'd would be the exact opposite of fair coverage (more people died in terrorist attacks everyday in Africa and those are almost always rejected). Dan the Animator (Commons Room) 17:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Per Dan above, for both death terms and recent geobias (ironically enough Somalia just had a terrorist attack with a higher death toll). Gotitbro (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Apparently if you go back to one of my earlier opposes, the consensus was GEOBIAS is not a valid criteria for consideration even with other ITN in the same area (I don't agree, but it was community consensus). Having said that, this article is written well and if riots go on for another 1-2 days, maybe better rationale to post. For now, pre-mature.Albertaont (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – 1-2-3 fatalities? Below the radar unless they were terribly important people. – Sca (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality – The death toll is not the important aspect. Civil unrest often have long-lasting effects on national politics. For that, I would support. However, the language and word choice employed in this articles stinks of POV. It needs work. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This feels like an extension of the anti-CAA protests which festered in ongoing for 7 or 8 months, and the Ram Temple which we've posted twice. There is obviously religious conflict being fomented in India. Not sure this little outburst fits the bill. --LaserLegs (talk) 23:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree. Perhaps, we should wait and see. I do not think, however, this nom should have a quick close. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
LaserLegs No this is not any such extension of Anti-CAA and no one is opposing Ram Temple (as it is order from Supreme Court & Archaeologists have proved that there was Ram temple before Babur destroyed it to build mosque ) hence it is no such protest but a riot planned by sub-groups of banned Popular Front of India alongwith Social Democratic Party of India maybe for political reasons in Karnataka. Branstarx3 (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Sumner Redstone

Article: Sumner Redstone (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNBC, NY Times
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American businessman and media magnate PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks to be in decent shape. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nice work, still some chunks of the article that could use some referencing. Not sure how much of some of the specific company details belong in Redstone's article versus an article about the company. SpencerT•C 16:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PCN02WPS: CN tags added. Some of the things like how a takover made "Viacom one of the top players in modern media" could potentially be removed if there's not a ref for it and it doesn't contribute specifically to the article. SpencerT•C 19:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Trini Lopez

Article: Trini Lopez (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press; The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: If I Had a Hammer singer (or at least one of them) and Dirty Dozen actor. COVID-19 CoatCheck (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) August 2020 Midwest derecho

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: August 2020 Midwest derecho (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A rare derecho storm causes widespread damage and affects millions in the Midwestern United States. (Post)
News source(s): The Weather Channel (1)(2); Associated Press (1)(2);The Washington Post
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Large-scale, newsworthy natural disaster caused by rare type of wind storm (derecho). Sources compare damage to hurricane winds, of which the storm's peak matched in wind speed. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 22:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A large tree fell down and crushed half a Subaru across the street from me (in Chicago) due to this. However, this does seem parochial overall. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 22:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    John M Wolfson, I'm confused how a massive multi-state weather event which left millions with utility outages, spawned five tornadoes, and destroyed roughly 1/3 of the crops on Iowa's agricultural land is "parochial" Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 23:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It's parochial in that it does not appear to have much significance outside of the United States; while that's not fatal to the nomination per the "please do not..." section, there appear to be thankfully zero deaths so far and little long-term impact, so I don't think this suitable for the Main Page. (We also didn't post Hurricane Isaias, another storm doing storm things that was otherwise transitory.) – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 23:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    John M Wolfson, indeed, the deaths are minimal (only two confirmed so far, mass injuries, however). Regardless I think it could be useful additionally considering these storm types are relatively rare, especially ones that last this long and get this big. However it doesn't really fit a WP:DYK type. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 23:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The Midwest is 3 times the size of France or Ukraine. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in the news, decent article. Highly developed countries with strictly enforced building codes have lower death tolls but that doesn't lessen the notability of the event. --LaserLegs (talk) 23:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    How do we measure the impact of the event if not by its death and destruction? GreatCaesarsGhost 12:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Geographic area, intensity (and frequency of occurrence at that intensity), economic impact, people impacted but not killed, coverage in the news of course and article quality are the most important and that's just what I came up with on short notice. [removed smug racist fuckwittery--Floquenbeam (talk) 20:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)] Developing countries always have higher death tolls because of weakly enforced or lax building codes along with under developed emergency services so that even a routine weather event results in causalities and we lose our minds and post these stubby, inevitably orphaned articles to the main page.--LaserLegs (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The equivalent of a Category 3 hurricane. Highly unusual event. -- King of ♥ 23:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That said, this one is weirder and crappier than mine, on account of the dead or missing cornfields. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for supporting my argument, it was this close to utterly collapsing! Don't jump on my bandwagon, though, it hasn't rolled right since "the storm". House still stands! InedibleHulk (talk) 04:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Would have been ITN worthy were there any significant deaths or destruction. Gotitbro (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Now, I might be biased because I lived through the event and just got electric service back nearly 60 hours later, but it had a fairly large swathe of destruction (Sioux Falls to Chicago via Des Moines). This was not a typical American weather event. The fact that it affected mostly corn and not people shouldn't diminish the storm's notability. –Fredddie 03:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
EDITOR'S NOTE: Iowa is basically a 58,000-square-mile (145,000 square kilometers) cornfield, roughly the size of Bangladesh. – Sca (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is absolutely a reason to diminish its notability. Similarly large storms occur frequently in Antarctica or the Southern Ocean, but are considered non-notable because only penguins and seabirds are affected. Modest Genius talk 14:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I thought a derecho was a lizard. – Sca (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and close Only killed two people, spawned 5 tornadoes, and affected some corn farmers. If you didn't post Hurricane Isaias, which killed 18 people, spawned 37 tornadoes, and caused $4.2 billion in damage, then it will be a joke posting this! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The usual power cuts and property damage but thankfully only two deaths, this doesn't meet the significance bar for me.-- P-K3 (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Ceres

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Ceres (dwarf planet) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Analysis of the Dawn fly-by of the dwarf planet Ceres (pictured) establishes that it is an ocean world. (Post)
News source(s): Guardian; Nature Astronomy; Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: The story should be taken with a pinch of salt as there's the usual hype about the prospects of finding life but Nature are making a big splash by publishing seven papers. If we don't list such missions when they launch, we should give them some attention when the results are analysed and reported. The Ceres article seems to need updating but it's a former featured article and vital so I'm not rushing at it. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support If as big as it seems. News still seems fuzzy here. Kingsif (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose per MG Kingsif (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support - I have to agree with Kingsif here.BabbaQ (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support per all. A cursory glance of the article (via Ctrl-Fing "ocean") doesn't mention it AFAICT, much less explain its significance. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 11:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose per MG. I knew it didn't look like an ocean world. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 12:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I'm close to having a CoI here, but will comment anyway. Ceres has long been known to have active geology and subsurface brines, which are responsible for the surface salt deposits and cryovolcanism, both known since 2016. These latest results fill in some of the details, but Ceres having ocean-level amounts of water is not a new discovery. It's also not really an ocean, but a layer of rock which is saturated with brine, so the blurb is misleading (it wasn't a Flyby either). None of the papers were important enough to publish in Nature itself, just three subsidiary journals owned by the same publisher. The source linked to above is from Nature Astronomy, not Nature, and is over-selling the importance because it's advertising work published in the same journal. Finally, the results are so confirmatory that the article itself has received no update whatsoever. Modest Genius talk 12:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's really a good thing we have actual scientists here who can let us know when we're falling prey to pop science journalism.--WaltCip-(BLM!Resist The Orange One) 12:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ITN nominations about Ceres/Dawn
Year Status Blurb
2007 Posted The NASA spacecraft Dawn is launched on a mission to explore mainbelt asteroid Vesta and dwarf planet Ceres.
2012 Posted Dawn leaves Vesta
2014 Posted The dwarf planet Ceres is observed to be releasing water vapor.
2015 Posted NASA's Dawn spacecraft enters the orbit of the dwarf planet Ceres.
2017 No consensus Scientists report the detection of aliphatic organic compounds on dwarf planet Ceres.
So, no results since Dawn arrived at Ceres. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let's wait until Elon arrives on Ceres. – Sca (talk) 15:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm waiting for The Boat Race on Ceres. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zero gravity rowing klaxon!!!!!!! --LaserLegs (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Based on how difficult it is to complete 18 to 20 minutes of rowing on the Thames, perhaps "zero gravity" (which of course it wouldn't be zero) is the way ahead. O';;l suggest it. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidentally, I had a dream about hydrohalite last night. It was terrifying. – Sca (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Gam-COVID-Vac

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Gam-COVID-Vac (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Russian Gam-COVID-Vac becomes the first registered vaccine against COVID-19. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Russia registers first COVID-19 vaccine — which will be called ‘Sputnik V’ in foreign markets.
News source(s): [4] (USA Today); [5] (The Boston Globe); [6] (Süddeutsche Zeitung); [7] (The Globe and Mail); [8] (Ouest-France); [9] (Il Gazzettino); [10] (Firstpost); [11] (Anadolu Agency); [12] (Rbc.ru); [13] (Interfax); [14] (Vedomosti); [15] (TASS)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The first vaccine against COVID-19. Александр Мотин (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTFORUM.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
...yes, because clearly any country outside the US or UK is incapable of creating vaccines.Albertaont (talk) 14:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Albertaont: The country which chose the President for the US people is much more capable of creating vaccines.--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Holy shit, he actually believes this article! Look at him! Look at him and laugh! --212.74.201.229 (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents
Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

RD: Konrad Steffen

Article: Konrad Steffen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Yahoo, NYtimes
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Climatologist that helped identified issues of global warming on arctic. Died while out on research at an ice station on the 8th. Local papers reported on the 10 so placing here, but noting only wider attention as of last 24-48hr (12th-14th). Article seems well sources and no issues, and right now, not quite stale. Masem (t) 00:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: P. J. Sheehan

Article: P. J. Sheehan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Irish Times; Irish Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Bumped) Lebanese government resigns

Articles: 2020 Beirut explosions (talk · history · tag) and Hassan Diab (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Lebanese government, including Prime Minister Hassan Diab, resign after the explosion in Beirut that killed over 200 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Lebanese government led by Prime Minister Hassan Diab resigns after protests, hyperinflation, and the explosion in Beirut
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Both articles updated

Nominator's comments: Pretty self explanatory, but Diab's speech was an amazing acknowledgement of corruption and giving over to the will of protesters. Kingsif (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose for now. The Hassan Diab article contains only a single sentence that says he resigned, and says nothing about his cabinet. I'm fine bumping the blurb and adding more information, but as yet the various Wikipedia articles you are highlighting are very light on relevant information and will need some expanding before we tell people they should read them. --Jayron32 18:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bump This is a continuation of the existing blurb about the explosion. So, just update that blurb and bump it. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Didn't the hyperinflation also impact the decision? – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 20:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • another question. Is the government really the government? I read somewhere that the political leaders just report to some more powerful people behind the scenes, which was the same people before and after the "revolution" last year. Is that true? If so, we should probably nuance the hook accordingly. Apologies, by knowledge of the full situation is incomplete. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Every short-term government overlaps with longer-lasting lobbyists, priests, tribal leaders, bankers, generals, corporate officers and organized crime bosses. But "really" rarely matters here. The titleholders "rule". InedibleHulk (talk) 23:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2020 PGA Championship

Article: 2020 PGA Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In golf, Collin Morikawa wins the PGA Championship for his first career major championship. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In golf, Collin Morikawa wins the PGA Championship for his first career major.
News source(s): Golf Digest ESPN
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Major championship in golf, fits with ITN:Recurring items criteria. Compy90🐉(talk) 10:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now on quality. I don't particularly agree with the general objection Andrew makes about the tone of the article - a golfing article would be expected to use golfing terminology. Birdie and Eagle are not jargon because many people such as myself, who don't play golf, nonetheless know what they mean. And the relevant articles are linked, for those who don't know the terminology. Our guidelines suggest targeting articles to those familiar with, but not necessarily expert in, a given subject. But a couple of Andrew's objections are valid. (1) The "Field" section is far too long and detailed, interrupting the flow of the article. It probably belongs in a subpage, with just a brief summary of how the field was chosen, and a few principal players, given here. And (2) the point about spectators clearly is an error, because Curry was a spectator. He wasn't there in any capacity other than to watch the golf. It sounds like that point needs to be nuanced. ITN articles don't have to be GA standard certainly, but they must still conform to basic structural norms. With a bit of tidying up this would be ready to go though.  — Amakuru (talk) 04:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is how all golf tournament articles are written. The place to challenge that practice is probably at WP:GOLF, not here. It shouldn't be valid to oppose this because of an objection to the way golf tournament articles, which have been posted at ITN many times before without objection, are written on Wikipedia. Regarding your second point, reliable sources reported that there were no spectators. Curry was apparently there as a "guest reporter".[17] Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 06:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) I have no intention of challenging anything at WP:GOLF. WikiProjects don't define the basic rules for article structure, that's the job of the MOS, and it applies everywhere. As an aside, I've checked the stats for golf articles and it lists only two articles as FAs (one of which is Wii Sports, only loosely connected to golf) and nine GAs. There are no tournament pages included in those so we have no point of reference. The figures seem astonishly low for such a prominent subject, and suggest the project may not be very active...  — Amakuru (talk) 06:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wasn't sure what "birdie" and "eagle" mean and so just had to look them up. And I bet if you asked the general public what "bogey" means in golf, you'd get a variety of amusing answers with "don't know" being a strong contender. A "hole-in-one" might be ok because it is self-explanatory but note that the phrase isn't used in the article even though there was at least one. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The lead should be accessible, but those terms are in the body. A sports event article should not be expected to teach a newbie about the sport. Linking to common technical terms is generally sufficient.—Bagumba (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Switching to support - Following a productive discussion, and new edits by Wjemather, the Field section has now been rewritten to contain just prose, with the other info in a linked child info. My concerns are therefore now addressed, and I am switching to support on this candidate. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose On article quality and prose. Gotitbro (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Appears fine or ITN now. Gotitbro (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro: Yep, the updated version at the time you wrote this would have been fine, but unfortunately that improvement was reverted so it's now back at the unwieldy poor quality version.  — Amakuru (talk) 05:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The "Field" section is unwieldy, and the bolding with linking is an eyesore. This isn't GA, but it's a large-scale failing of MOS:PSEUDOHEAD: Do not make pseudo-headings by abusing semicolon markup (reserved for description lists) and try to avoid using bold markup. It's screaming to be a table with minutiae moved to footnotes.—Bagumba (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Bagumba. And the summaries for the first three rounds don't really pass muster. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 07:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Seems like some here are trying to push the bar too high. The tone and style may be wanting, and the layout may not be ideal, however this meets the basic quality criteria for ITN – "Articles are held to a minimum standard of quality. Articles should be a minimally comprehensive overview of the subject, not omitting any major items." wjematherplease leave a message... 11:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Entirely agree. Not sure why this article has attracted so many pile-on opposes when it's no worse than many other ITN/R sports items we've routinely posted. I thought the standard was sufficiently referenced with prose summaries.-- P-K3 (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope. Basic compliance with the MOS is also up there. We're showcasing this on the main page of our project, let's at the very least showcase the way articles are actually structured, rather than some bizarre format developed within one project and seemingly copied every year because nobody can think of anything better to do. As ever on this page, if people just made some basic changes, like those proposed by Bagumba above, this could just go straight up.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    We posted both the Masters and the US Open last year which used an identical format. To suddenly declare that what was acceptable before is now unacceptable smacks of moving the goalposts for me. (Sorry, can't think of an equivalent golfing metaphor.) P-K3 (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems raising the bar without prior discussion or consensus to do so. I'm struggling to find the passage in the ITN criteria which mentions MOS compliance and to what degree it is necessary. For information, it actually quite closely replicates the format used by the major championships themselves for many years, and is to a degree still used by the USGA & R&A, so attacks on the project in this regard are somewhat unwarranted. wjematherplease leave a message... 22:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have edited the field section in accordance with the criticisms and suggestions of Amakuru, Bagumba, Gotitbro, and The Rambling Man above. Let me know if you have any further objections and I would be happy to work on fixing them. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 22:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Reverted due to making the information much less accessible and also losing several details. Changes in this regard would be better discussed centrally (suggest WT:GOLF), as there are many tournament articles with the same mos/formatting issues (as noted above). wjematherplease leave a message... 22:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I've gotten myself involved in enough inane discussions here lately, I'm not interested in starting a new one over formatting at WT:GOLF. I guess this is the end of golf at ITN unless someone else wants to start working on changing this. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 22:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    We shouldn't sacrifice content on the alter of MOS. It does no service to the encyclopedia. There are many ways of removing the bolding without losing content and accessibility/readability – your solution (moving most content – some would say the most important details – into footnotes) was not one of them. wjematherplease leave a message... 22:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I reasoned that was what everyone objecting here wanted since Bagumba suggested it and most other opposes were on similar grounds. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 23:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I think calling a section on the field "most content" and even "most important" is really a far stretch, I would say most people which would access this article from the front page would be interested in how the tournament actually played out, which is behind 3 full pages of rather trivial information for a non golf enthusiast. This big section actually hurts the readability. Chaosquo (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It shouldn't need spelling out, but I was obviously referring only to the content of that section. Misuse of footnotes is worse than perceived MOS transgressions. People are welcome to discuss ways of presenting the information better, in collaboration with the editors who do the bulk of the work in this area, but sadly it seems none here are willing (discussion started here). wjematherplease leave a message... 09:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The topic under consideration is the 2020 PGA Tournament, and it should be clear by now from the number of objecters here, that the format of that article simply doesn't conform to Wikipedia guidelines on how to structure an article. I am happy to have a conversation about the details of this page, with a view to getting it listed at ITN, since that's the goal here. We can have that by WP:BOLDly trying different layouts on the page (which both Bzweebl and myself have now done), discussing it at the talk page, and coming up with a sensible compromise. But the starting point has to be that the previous format was not of sufficient quality, since multiple experienced editors have now made that same point here on this page. If we come up with a sensible way to present the info, then no doubt WikiProject Golf can incorporate that into their guidelines going forward, but non-members of that project are not bound by any edicts coming from "those who do the bulk of the work in this area", nor are those editors exempt from following the basic MOS guidelines. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The suggestion was only to engage with the golf project; that way when a format is agreed upon, past and future articles will likely follow the same standards (as it is those active project editors who will likely do the bulk of any remedial work). Otherwise we end up with this article and maybe a handful others being "fixed" and the rest not. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, sure, engaging with the golf regulars, including yourself, is vital and no doubt they will also have good ideas about how to go forward. The more voices the better. I just think that in the immediate term, we should concentrate on the 2020 PGA as a concrete example that we can work on, hopefully with a view to getting it posted on ITN. If we try to fix everything at once, we won't have time for this one to be featured.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. There have been numerous heavy changes to the article, but the current version seems fine to me. The information is there, the rounds have brief-but-adequate prose summaries, and referencing appears sufficient. Modest Genius talk 11:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don't feel comfortable thrusting to the main page an article wherein an edit war is taking place.--WaltCip-(BLM!Resist The Orange One) 11:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Switch to support Tbe problem I had with the "Field" section is resolved with the spinout of 2020 PGA Championship field. With 100+ field, this is deserved and not a mere fork just to game ITN. Thanks to Bzweebl, Amakuru and Wjemather for carrying out the changes.—Bagumba (talk) 14:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Looks like issues have been addressed on the article talk page and consensus is in favor of posting. SpencerT•C 15:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Indian coal mine auction

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: Coal in India (talk · history · tag) and Hasdeo Arand (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Development of 40 new coal mines in India threatens the virgin forest of Hasdeo Arand. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The indigenous virgin forest people of Hasdeo Arand feel threatened by the development of forty new coal mines in India.
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: As we're focussing on India, it is interesting to see what else is happening there. Modi isn't just building a triumphal new temple; he's planning to make India into "the world’s largest exporter of coal". Elsewhere, we have record summer temperatures but global warming isn't really news now, is it? Coalgate has been a scandal in India for a while and the focus of the current story now seems to be the threat to this virgin forest and its indigeneous people. The article about it is new and so perhaps needs expansion. We should move quickly because, if we wait, the forest won't be there any more. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Notability? The other Indian stories which we are featuring are a hotel fire, a religious photo op and a plane skidding into a ditch. Which story is really significant? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who needs hotel fires when you've got all that cheap Indian coal? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Oppose ...and if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bicycle. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The auctions for 41 blocks of land are currently running and the bid deadline was August 18. That's why it's in the news now. But by all means wait until the land is strip-mined and the coal is burnt. In the meantime, let's play more golf, shall we? Andrew🐉(talk) 20:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Protests posted) Belarusian election

Proposed image
Articles: 2020 Belarusian presidential election (talk · history · tag) and 2020 Belarusian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers amid pro-democracy protests. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Belarus cracks down on pro-democracy protests as incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Belarus cracks down on pro-democracy protests as President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko claims victory in a presidential election amid claims of electoral fraud.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In Belarus, President Alexander Lukashenko claims victory in a presidential election amid pro-democracy protests and claims of electoral fraud.
Alternative blurb IV: ​ In Belarus, Protests follow the contested re-election of President Alexander Lukashenko.
Alternative blurb V: ​ Incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) wins a presidential election amid protests and claims of electoral fraud.
News source(s): Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters
Credits:

Both articles updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Assuming this is ITN/R, as a national election, but the election is so widely considered a sham that the protests surrounding it are the bigger story. Smurrayinchester 08:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about Alt4, offered above? Short & to the pt. – Sca (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime
  • A 17-year-old Chili's hostess is hospitalized after being attacked at a Chili's restaurant in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, after telling a large group of women that they may not share a table due to safety regulations regarding the coronavirus. The hostess has no plans to return to the Chili's restaurant where she was attacked. (MSN)

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Martin Birch

Article: Martin Birch (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News; The Guardian; The Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Generally all fine, but the discography section contains a cite to discogs which, looking at the RS noticeboard archives, is not considered suitable for citations, only external links. Please could you make sure every entry in the list is verifiable by one or more of the non discogs sources?  — Amakuru (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Kamala

Article: Kamala (wrestler) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [21][22]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 GreatCaesarsGhost 01:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Is there a policy / convention on using stage names vs real names in the RD section? Seems like this post should be referenced as James Harris. But, is there a precedent in this group to use stage names? Regards. Ktin (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where he worked and with whom those four years is in his Cagematch profile (External links), if anyone's feeling citey. Click the Career or Matches buttons. I can't paste links, or I might. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about being "citey" (whatever that means). It's about following one of our most important policies.These cite tags need to be resolved before posting this. I have amended my comment to make it more clear. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Feeling citey just means "wanting to cite". Cagematch is considered reliable for results. Resolution's pretty easy. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You literally just made that up. Spman (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only the first part. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see you added those tags about a minute after I called "ready", so I stand by it; it was ready at the time. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The artist known as "Prince" got a blurb in 2016, no formal address, around the time Chyna got RDed. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You've got the wrong guy, I tell ya! InedibleHulk (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see one, about why his WrestleMania match was scrapped. Nobody should care. ITN is rigged against wrestlers. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sheesh... and they don't even carry guns. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
I'll put in some cite tags. Does placing a reference at the end of the paragraph mean it's verifying every sentence within the paragraph? It's not clear.-- P-K3 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I usually never use that trick when trying to get an article rapidly posted at WP:ITN/RD. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a trick, they cover everything, have for years. Staleness is coming. Hulk is dead! InedibleHulk (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They may well cover everything, but in my experience putting multiple links at the end of a paragraph with nothing on the individual lines, makes it very difficult to actually verify the facts. It's somewhat better than just listing all sources at the end of the article, like the old days of Wikipedia, but it's a step in that direction, and I definitely think it's best to be more specific on individual lines. If all the cites cover all the facts, then scatter them around a bit. If some cover some facts and others others, then that's easy. Just put them against the correct ones.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(I'm very surprised there is not clear MoS policy on this. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Easy if you can highlight, click, drag and all that luxury. Typing for me is like entering a Nintendo password. Nobody who read his article in life complained about clumps. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because nobody read his article until he died. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Two Kamalas in one day – merkwürdig. – Sca (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Kurt Luedtke

Article: Kurt Luedtke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press; The Detroit News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 23:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2020 Vijayawada fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Vijayawada fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and 22 are injured in a fire at a COVID-19 facility centre in India's Andhra Pradesh. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead in Vijayawada due to a fire in Hotel Swarna Palace.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, BBC, AP, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Sorry guys, this fire is incident has a wide coverage than the 2020 Czech Republic apartment fire. Abishe (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2020 Bohumín apartment fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Bohumín apartment fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in a fire at an apartment in Bohumín, Czech Republic. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in a burning apartment in Bohumín, Czech Republic.
Alternative blurb II: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in an apparent arson attack in Bohumín, Czech Republic.
News source(s): BBC, Euronews
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The fire incident is regarded as the worst ever fire accident in the history of Czech Republic according to the sources. I know there was another article related to 2020 Punjab alcohol poisoning which killed over 100 people didn't get an inclusion in the ITN section. Abishe (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

  1. ^ "Three killed in passenger train derailment after storms in northeast Scotland". CNN.
  2. ^ News, A. B. C. "3 dead after train derails in Scotland". ABC News. {{cite web}}: |last1= has generic name (help)
  3. ^ "Passenger Train Derails in Scotland; 'Serious Injuries' Reported | Voice of America - English". www.voanews.com.
  4. ^ "Bloomberg - Are you a robot?". www.bloomberg.com. {{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help)
  5. ^ "Three people die in Scotland passenger train derailment". www.aljazeera.com.
  6. ^ "Three dead after passenger train derails in Scotland". www.abc.net.au. 12 August 2020.
  7. ^ "Several believed killed as train derails in Scotland". France 24. 12 August 2020.
  8. ^ Aug 12. "'Serious injuries' reported after Scottish train derails - Times of India". The Times of India.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  9. ^ "Three killed as train derails in Scotland, leaving carriages piled up". South China Morning Post. 12 August 2020.