Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 48: Line 48:
*'''Support but wait''' - this has the potential to become very very bad, or it could just result in stern condemnation. We should wait a little bit rather than rushing to beat the news. - '''[[User:Floydian|Floydian]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:Floydian|<span style="color: #3AAA3A;">τ</span>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Floydian|<span style="color: #3AAA3A;">¢</span>]]</sub> 21:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support but wait''' - this has the potential to become very very bad, or it could just result in stern condemnation. We should wait a little bit rather than rushing to beat the news. - '''[[User:Floydian|Floydian]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:Floydian|<span style="color: #3AAA3A;">τ</span>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Floydian|<span style="color: #3AAA3A;">¢</span>]]</sub> 21:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''' -- a serious escalation that is dominating the news across the world. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 21:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''' -- a serious escalation that is dominating the news across the world. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 21:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Wait''': it's not yet clear that the missile ''was'' Russian (the BBC is reporting that it might have been an [[S-300 missile system|S-300]], which doesn't have the range to hit Poland from Russia). --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


==== (Closed) Artemis 1 ====
==== (Closed) Artemis 1 ====

Revision as of 21:40, 15 November 2022

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Tadej Pogačar in June 2022
Tadej Pogačar

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

November 15

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Politics and elections

Sports


2022 Russian missile strike on Poland

Article: 2022 Russian missile strike on Poland (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least two people are killed after Russian missiles strike the Polish village of Przewodów. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least two people are killed after Russian missiles cross into Poland and strike the village of Przewodów.
News source(s): AP, Bloomberg News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Poland is a NATO member state, and this has not only propelled its Prime Minister into an emergency meeting, but also raised concerns about a possible invocation of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Currently there isn't too much prose in the article itself, but the very implications behoove me to open a floor for us nonetheless. aeromachinator (talk to me here) 19:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Number of sources have mentioned that both Polish and US officials have confirmed it. Very significant in the war, since as Kip said, it is a (likely accidental) strike on a non-combatant. Awhahoo (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)(non-ec !vote struck)[reply]
  • Because two people being killed, while tragic for their families and friends, isnt quite on the level of being on the front page of Wikipedia. Chicago, for example, has averaged two people killed a day so far this month. nableezy - 21:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Artemis 1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Artemis 1 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ NASA's Artemis 1 launches to the Moon successfully/explodes. (Post)
News source(s): CBS
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: I am nominating this early to allow editors to give it a checkup. Pretty high chances it will actually launch on Nov 16 1:04 a.m. EST, and wether it goes out in a big boom or actually does launch only like 7 years late, it will make the news round. ITNR cause it's the first launch of a major rocket family. 2A02:2F01:F206:A500:ACB9:80C1:561A:62A0 (talk) 16:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination is premature. It is impossible to assess the update to the article before the event has occurred. I think this should be closed; come back if/when it actually launches. Modest Genius talk 16:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Worldwide population exceeds 8B

Article: World population (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The world population exceeds eight billion people, based on United Nation estimates. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The United Nations estimates the world population to have exceeded eight billion.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The United Nations estimates the world population to have exceeded eight billion.
News source(s): UN, USA Today, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The "Projections" section needs a few sources, but the article seems otherwise complete. This was actually in the news starting a few days ago, but I wanted to wait until this day, when the projection is said to cross 8B. There's some other interesting facts, such as India expected to exceed China by 2023, or that we are expected to peak around 10.5B ppl (due to reduced childbirth and impact of low-income regions) but I don't think we need much more on the blurb. Masem (t) 01:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Bit mixed on this one, but at the end of the day this is a huge milestone for humanity, if arbitrary. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support - I don't know if we posted 7B or not, but I agree with the previous !voters that this is a huge milestone definitely worth an ITN blurb. Quantum XYZ (chat) 11:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And I'd like to note that I prefer the altblurb here, with a link to Day of Eight Billion. Quantum XYZ (chat) 11:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Per above. MSN12102001 (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Firstly, 8 billion is just an arbitrary number only of interest because we use the decimal system. The population is going up steadily, so hitting any particular milestone is both routine and expected. Secondly, as noted above, this is completely an estimate. The figure may have actually been reached previously or maybe hasn't yet and there's no reason to favour UN estimates over others. All in all, not a story worth including at ITN and better suited ti DYK.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The US census bureau estimate is still well short of 8bn.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, if we used a base-6 system we wouldn't care about 8B, but we don't, and almost nobody does in everyday life. Quantum XYZ (chat) 12:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support. Yes this is an arbitrary number, and yes it's only an estimate. But it's also of fundamental importance, and population growth is a topic we would never post at all if we didn't use big numbers as milestones. The world population article is mostly excellent and will interest our readers. There are currently two orange tagged sections that need addressing, though it appears those would be easy to do (or could be moved to the talk page for now). In contrast, Day of Eight Billion is barely more than a stub so should not be bold-linked. Modest Genius talk 12:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support pbp 12:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose arbitrary milestone, nothing particularly important about numbers that have a bunch of zeroes at the end. --Jayron32 13:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I suppose it's true that the figure of 8B only really matters within our deeply ingrained social constructs relating to numbers and decimals. But I think we ought to cast the number itself aside, and instead focus more on this interesting factoid from the article, which is not arbitrary: It took over two million years of human prehistory and history for the human population to reach one billion and only 219 years more to grow to 8 billion. The scale of population growth in the last couple of centuries has been staggeringly immense, even factoring in all of our wars and pandemics. At some point, it needs to be recognized. There's really no better time than now. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's only surprising to people who don't understand how math works. Exponential growth is well understood, and human population has followed a largely predictable curve for centuries. The 8 billionth currently existing human is not particularly more interesting than the 7,999,999,999th person, excepting that they won the round number lottery. --Jayron32 16:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    See also compound interest for similar math. It's basically saying my savings account grew faster when there was more money in it. Which is nice, but also not news. nableezy - 17:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article doesn't explain the significance, making it seem arbitrary. Lacks a sufficient update per WP:ITN:

    The decision as to when an article is updated enough is subjective, but a five-sentence update (with at minimum three references, not counting duplicates) is generally more than sufficient, while a one-sentence update is highly questionable.

    Bagumba (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Bagumba. The substance of the update is the paramount purpose of ITN. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, a very big milestone. 4me689 (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, very large milestone! This will change sources from the 7 billion figure I have been used to for so long, important to promote this news. --Pithon314 (talk) 14:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait – I like this topic and I think it can make a great blurb. However, the World population article does not yet go in enough detail/isn't updated enough, and the Day of Eight Billion article is not ready to be featured. In particular, I would really want to see information on how the crossing of the threshold was calculated. Right now it is very unclear why it was estimated that today is the day. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 14:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Milestone in history of humanity, source seems reliable. Editor 5426387 (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Werner Franke

Article: Werner Franke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Süddeutsche Zeitung/dpa
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German cell biologist and doping expert. Grimes2 (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Virginia McLaurin

Article: Virginia McLaurin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WHUR
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American supercentenarian and "dancing grandma" - Dumelow (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support Well-sourced, but the prose is very weak at the moment; there is basically a black hole in coverage from 1939 to 2013. The paragraphing is also not ideal, with several short 1-sentence paragraphs. Regardless, as I said, it is well-sourced, and enough for our purposes. Curbon7 (talk) 12:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Willie Donald

Article: Willie Donald (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Press and Journal
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish cricketer and cricket administator. I've done a little work on the article but it looks pretty good. Date of death not known but announced today - Dumelow (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Dumelow (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Geoff Cochrane

Article: Geoff Cochrane (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The date of death hasn't been publicly reported yet as far as I can tell, but the article on The Spinoff was published today (14 November, NZ time) and the first tweets reporting his death were published 13 November (eg this tweet from his former publicist, this tweet from Victoria University's writing programme). Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Slovenian elections

Proposed image
Articles: 2022 Slovenian presidential election (talk · history · tag) and Nataša Pirc Musar (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The independent Nataša Pirc Musar (pictured) wins the presidential elections in Slovenia, becoming its first female president (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The independent Nataša Pirc Musar (pictured) wins the presidential elections in Slovenia, becoming its first female president
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: There were more updaters and also the creator of the article of the Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. It seems I have updated the article 2022 Slovenian presidential elections as well as the lead of Natasa Pirc Musar with the info that she won. But anyway, important is the result. Doremo updated the infobox of the Natasa Pirc Musar article and Topjur01 created the Natasa Pirc Musar article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Change of head of state, first female president, article is of sufficient quality. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2022 Istanbul bombing

Article: 2022 Istanbul bombing (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least six people are killed and 81 injured in a bombing on İstiklal Avenue in Istanbul, Turkey. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ ​
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This is a tragic event in one of the busiest and most visited cities in the world. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Expansion needed. Prodrummer619 (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support when expanded - Notable event, all over the news. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  17:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – as has been said, this is extremely notable and newsworthy. – BarleyButt (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability, but Wait for expansion MyriadSims (talk) 22:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - notable event, this event is all over the news. Editor 5426387 (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait Of course notable event, but news are still coming in.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - A current event with ongoing developments, also due to general bandwidth shrinking for social media in Turkey, this might prove helpful to acquire news on the event. Mavromatis (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't add the WL on Turkey in the blurb, it could deviate the attention on the bombing a bit.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Concur. Curbon7 (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that a wikilink to Turkey is not needed. That being said, I don't see the harm in it and I don't think it will substantially detract from the bold bombing's relative prominence. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup

Article: 2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: England wins the ICC Men's T20 World Cup, beating Pakistan at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ ​In cricket, England defeat Pakistan in the final of the ICC Men's T20 World Cup.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In cricket, the ICC Men's T20 World Cup concludes with England as champions.
News source(s): [3][4]
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: ITN/R, large event in the sport. Posted before in 2016, 2014, 2010 (and possibly more but I haven't checked). Still requires updating as it only just happened. echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 12

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Politics and elections

Sports

(Ready) RD:John Connaughton

Article: John Connaughton (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Port Vale FC Stoke Sentinel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English footballer. Couple of achievements need citing. Not overly familiar with football RS but will take a look - Dumelow (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Carroll Hubbard

Article: Carroll Hubbard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Louisville Courier Journal
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician convicted for campaign finance violations. I've expanded it a little based on the above obituary - Dumelow (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Curbon7, I added that content (with a cite to the Courier Journal) but the citation was lost in later edits by others. Now readded - Dumelow (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Issues resolved. Curbon7 (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Senate posted, wait on House) 2022 United States elections

Articles: 2022 United States Senate elections (talk · history · tag) and 2022 United States House of Representatives elections (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majorities in the Senate and in the House of Representatives.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate, while the Republican Party wins control of the House of Representatives.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate, while the House elections remain too close to call.
News source(s): NBC News, CNN, AP
Credits:

Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Finally. The Senate has been called for Democrats; should we wait for the House? Davey2116 (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do think senate control was the big picture here, but I would at least wait a half day from now to see if the house direction looks any closer. Masem (t) 02:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a matter of counting. The deadline for mail-in votes to be received is in the future in some places. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Failed to follow WP:NPOV in your blurb
  2. Used a non-news source
  3. Said something false (there was no blue wave, there was just the lack of a red wave)
Tube·of·Light 03:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There was a blue wave tho, dems gained seats in the senate and will win the house as well, trump is finished 2600:100F:B100:1F76:5906:EF2A:8D24:297C (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this is not the place for this kind of stuff so stop. _-_Alsor (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Donald J Trump was not standing in this election, and the existence of any sort of 'wave' is a matter for political punditry, not Wikipedia headlines. GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait till both houses are called (If Nevada goes to the GOP, then just add that the senate is undecided as Georgia will have a run-off election). Tube·of·Light 03:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The default assumption was that the House will go to the GOP and that the Dems were the slight favorite to retain the Senate, but the Senate could go either way. That the Dems retain control of the Senate is then nontrivial news. But the House going to the GOP is a foregone conclusion (probability of this not happening is not zero but it is extremely small), we should not wait for that to become official. Count Iblis (talk) 03:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A)The GOP was the favorite to win the Senate, B) the House going to the GOP was not a foregone conclusion before the election or even today, C) The Dem chances in the House are way over zero (betting markets say about 20%), & D) no one is talking about waiting for it to be official, we follow reliable sources, who have not called the house. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A GOP House would likely impeach Biden regardless of Senate control. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any talk of impeachment is pure crystal balls. GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post. The House has not been called and is not a foregone conclusion, the Democrats have a narrow but realistic path to retaining the majority. There is no reason to wait for the House to be called(which may not be soon due to recounts) in order to post the Senate. 331dot (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting Senate control of the House will probably come down to California, which notoriously takes weeks to count all of its ballots. Preferably we post the Senate now and update the blurb when the House is decided. YD407OTZ (talk) 10:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until we have official results as we've had enough of wishful thinking and misrepresentation. And we're an encyclopedia not news media and so there's no rush. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We have never waited for official results/certifications/inaugurations/formalities. We follow the news. If you don't think the news should be in the business of reporting unofficial election results, take that up with them, not us. 331dot (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also very curious as to what is being "misrepresented" here. This is In the news, not "list of official events and happenings"331dot (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why? It may not be for awhile, and at that point it will be said posting the Senate is stale. We can always add the House later. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing I noticed was that the Democrats have less seats than the Republicans – just 48 to 49. It seems that the balance is held by two Independents – Angus King and Bernie Sanders. Elsewhere, this would be called a coalition or hung parliament. This doesn't seem to be strong control by any party as, when it's so close, any Senator can cause trouble for such close votes. So blurbing a Democratic majority seems incorrect when you need 51 for a majority and they only have 48. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
King and Sanders caucus with the Democrats; a UK comparison would be the relationship between Labour and the Co-ops, basically one and the same. Curbon7 (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add on to that, because the Vice President is a Democrat, she can serve as a tie breaker in the case of 50-50 votes. So, for all practical purposes, the Democrats control the Senate. YD407OTZ (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sanders & King are essentially independents in name only. They caucus w/the Democrats & usually vote the same way as the Democrats. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The caucus mechanism seems mainly to do with allocation of seats on committees. But when it comes to party allegiance and voting, someone like Angus King seems to be his own man – "neither a Democrat nor a Republican, but an American". According to Angus_King#Political_positions, "King voted with the Democratic Party 43% of the time", which doesn't sound like consistent, dependable support. As he rejects the party label, we should not be pinning one on him. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider that nearly all RSes reporting on the results have stated that the Dems kept control of the Senate. You could argue that they are wrongly categorized, but between what RS say and what we know King and Sanders have done, this is a fact. Masem (t) 13:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While I’m neutral WRT whether or not the Senate results should be posted now or when the House results are known, I oppose the 1st 2 alt blurbs. We shouldn’t be a crystal ball. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Dallas airshow mid-air collision

Proposed image
Article: 2022 Dallas airshow mid-air collision (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A Bell P-63 Kingcobra and a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress (picturedcollide mid-air at a Dallas airshow killing six. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Six people are killed in a mid-air plane crash at an air show in Dallas.
News source(s): NYTABC News, CBS
Credits:

Nominator's comments:   There are not that many air worthy B17's left its being reported on by notable news agencies. No offical death toll yet. Koltinn (talk) 23:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (FWIW I've seen 6 tossed around as a number for death toll). An unfortunate incident and while highly published, not really the type of disaster we cover. --Masem (t) 23:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Masem MyriadSims (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per Masem PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of coverage, this type of collision is uncommon given the nature of both of these aircraft. Editor 5426387 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mehran Karimi Nasseri

Article: Mehran Karimi Nasseri (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The Iranian traveller that had been living in CdG airport for 18 years that inspired "The Terminal". One CN that I see. Masem (t) 21:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Women's Rugby Union World Cup

Proposed image
Article: 2021 Rugby World Cup Final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In rugby union football, New Zealand (captain and player of the match Ruahei Demant pictured) defeat England in the final of the 2021 Rugby World Cup. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In rugby union, New Zealand (captain and player of the match Ruahei Demant pictured) defeat England in the final of the 2021 Rugby World Cup.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Complete article on the final. Presuming we link the final rather than tournament. And yes, the 2021 World Cup. Kingsif (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Did we blurb the cup in 2017? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PrecariousWorlds: Yes :) Kingsif (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then Support PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait no actual prose about the game other than in the lead (which needs to reflect the article content). Thus not yet been updated enough as per WP:ITNCRIT. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC) – Wait strikethrough and now support as per issues addressed by Kinkgsif below. Edit by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality Background section does not cite any sources XxLuckyCxX (talk) 21:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now added references. Kingsif (talk) 23:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrew Davidson: Well I never said it was ITNR, just that it was posted last time, and I know you know that it's wrong to oppose something just because it isn't ITN/R (aka most things) rather than evaluate its own merits. Kingsif (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was marked as ITN/R, which I recognised from the green tint. Kingsif has since changed it. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't appreciate the implication of that comment; as said, I never marked it ITN/R. You have also not expanded on whether you think only ITN/R items can possibly get posted, with an unexplained !oppose. Kingsif (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections


RD: John Aniston

Article: John Aniston (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Greek-American actor. - Indefensible (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Death just announced today. Article is sufficiently sourced. Star Mississippi 22:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Sir Ian Barker

Article: Ian Barker (jurist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chief Justice of New Zealand tribute
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: New Zealand High Court judge. I've expanded from the source I've linked above - Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Keith Levene

Article: Keith Levene (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Founding member of The Clash and Public Image LtdThriley (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rajni Kumar

Article: Rajni Kumar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hindustan Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian educator. Ktin (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sven-Bertil Taube

Article: Sven-Bertil Taube (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BabbaQ (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support One of Sweden's most notable artists from an equally notable artist family. Article is in nice shape thanks to BabbaQ. cart-Talk 14:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: "During the 1980s and 1990s, Taube starred in a number of Swedish films and television series, while keeping his music career alive." could do with a citation; the filmography includes only three entries for those two decades, one of which is British, so does not support the claim. Thryduulf (talk) 16:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Films added and claim reinstated. cart-Talk 18:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+Support. No outstanding issues I can see. Thryduulf (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gallagher

Article: Gallagher (comedian) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN, Yahoo!
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prop and observational comedian, best known for his watermelon-smashing routine and many popular specials in the 1980s. CoatCheck (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kevin Conroy

Article: Kevin Conroy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [7]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) FTX bankruptcy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: FTX (company) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: FTX, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, files for bankruptcy. (Post)
News source(s): Wall Street Journal
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I tend to take a restrained approach to posting business news, but this looks to be legitimately a huge deal. Front page news globally amid a rout in crypto markets. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's been, on and off, the top story on FT, Bloomberg, and the WSJ for days. — Mainly 17:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Bankruptcy is one of those ways that companies regularly get out of a bad financial situation. This is standard business news, and given the finicky nature of cryptocurrency on WP, we should be very wary of this stuff. --Masem (t) 17:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. If Microsoft or Apple or Lockheed Martin went bankrupt I'm fairly sure those would be posted. Crypto is an area of strong interest, so much so that editing about it is under sanctions. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy is not the end of a company or the like, though it does imply it is in financial trouble. It's like an athlete stating they are retiring, something that can always be undone. Masem (t) 18:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And I think we should post notable retirements too. Something should not need to be written in stone or otherwise irreversible to be posted. 331dot (talk) 18:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    FTX is not a company on the level of Microsoft, Apple, or Lockheed Martin. DarkSide830 (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    While I'm not familiar with crypto, from what I read, this was a very important company in that world. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose bankruptcies aren't really ITN material in my opinion. FTXs value was overinflated in the first place. Moreover, it seems like we don't really post bankruptcies. Previously nominated were: Sri Lanka in July 2022, Whiting Petrolium in April 2020, Thomas Cook and Purdue Pharma in September 2019, PG&E in January 2019, Sears in October 2018, Gibson in May 2018, Toys R Us in March 2018. None of those were posted. And in the end, Sri Lanka, Whiting Petrolium (merged with Chord Energy), PG&E, Sears, Gibson, and Toys R Us successfully exited bankruptcy and continue to do business. YD407OTZ (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
YD407OTZ Well, we don't post something until we do. Consensus can change. If it doesn't, fair enough, but we have to start somewhere. 331dot (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find in the ITN criteria where it says "earth shattering importance" is required. 331dot (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning oppose - I can see both sides on this, but, per Masem, I don't think this is notable enough for ITn PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Although not a bank like the Lehman brothers and causing a crash to the USD, FTX was the second largest crypto exchange, and its bankruptcy of over $16billion and has had a profound effect on the entire crypto market. The recent crypto crash is a result of this and something of this caliber is likely to receive a response from the SEC on regulation. I think the shock-factor with this bankruptcy is that this company was levering funds it didn't have and that those involved in the crypto community did not think a crypto organisation of this size would become insolvent like this. GR86 (📱) 21:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Recapture of Kherson

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Ukraine recaptures the city of Kherson from Russian forces following their retreat. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I do not believe every step of the war should be posted as a blurb, but the recapture of the only regional capital to fall in this conflict seems a notable step. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This highlights a different article than Ongoing, which is about the broader conflict. 331dot (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly a reliable source, but if something actually comes of this, I might support a blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Like nom, I don't support blurbing every progress update of the war, but this does have special geopolitical significance as Kherson was the only regional capital captured by Russian forces at any point. The Kip (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose See ongoing, It's not unexpected or unusual for territory to change hands in wars. We didnt blurb other victories/ends of battles like the fall of Mariupol either. The end of a battle dont merit a burb, the end of the war probably would. The war stories that we did blurb were blurbed for reasons that reflect a particular significance of an event in a historical context. (bucha warcrimes, and the Moskva being the worst loss the Russian Navy has suffered since WWII) ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  17:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is historically significant, the recapture of the only captured regional capital. I haven't understood the general resistance to posting things here that's developed in recent years. What are we afraid of? 331dot (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Donetsk and Luhansk city say hi. It's not the only captured regional capital under Russian control, even if not recently captured. In terms of significance, I would argue the defeat in Kharkiv and retreat of Kyiv are just as significant; as was the fall of Mariupol being Ukraine's last holdout on the Sea of Azov but we didn't blurb those, since at the core they just represent conclusions of smaller battles in a bigger war which is covered in ongoing; Kherson isn't even fully liberated since most of the land of the Oblast is on the other side of the Dnieper. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  18:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4iamking You'll want to tell the BBC that, that's where I got that claim, and it's in their headline right now. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BBC's headline can be whatever, 1 source doesn't dictate reality necessarily. BBC's headline has the caveat "since the war began" which is more accurate, But it certainly isn't the only controlled territorial capital. Even Sievierodonetsk which was the de-facto Ukrainian capital of Luhansk before the war is captured. Im not denying that its a major victory for 1 waring party and a defeat for the other, but there are lots of those occurrences in this war, and they need not all be blurbed, since thats why it is in ongoing; else we'd be doing in on a monthly basis. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  19:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The BBC says "Today was a hugely consequential moment in a war now in its ninth month". So if it's not a key event, they need to fire their journalists and start over. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Significant Development, the retaking of an regional capital in an area occupied for over 8 months would be major news. Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support biggest victory since Kiev. We posted the fall of a bridge, this is a far bigger event.
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ☎️ 📄 04:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Russia occupies Crimea, and Ukraine has long stated its intentions to both reclaim it and destroy the bridge. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also there was long series of destroyed military targets in Crimea long before Kerch Bridge explosion. So arguing there "wasn't war in Crimea" seams like uninformed opinion to me.--Jenda H. (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Support - Pretty split on this one, but we posted the Crimean Bridge explosion, and this is a much larger development in the war, possibly the largest in the last 6 months. Could have big consequences. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Wolf Schneider

Article: Wolf Schneider (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Süddeutsche Zeitung
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German journalist, author and language critic Grimes2 (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Siddhaanth Vir Surryavanshi

Article: Siddhaanth Vir Surryavanshi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8] [9] [10]
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian television actor ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


(Closed) 2022 Nepal earthquake

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Nepal earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A 5.7 magnitude earthquake strikes Nepal, leaving at least six people dead. (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The earthquake was widely felt in western Nepal and northern India. बडा काजी (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small scale both in terms of death toll and literal scale. MyriadSims (talk) 02:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per above PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Withdrawn) Ongoing removal: Mahsa Amini protests

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Mahsa Amini protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: No major protests in the past week. No fresh updates to the articleRAN1 (talk) 18:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No major protests doesn't mean there aren't protests. The name is just 'Mahsa Amini protests', and doesn't specify major protests. And besides, the article itself states that they are "an ongoing series of protests" MyriadSims (talk) 20:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MyriadSims: They're ongoing, but they're not in the news anymore. I've seen more coverage of the hypersonic missile claim. RAN1 (talk) 05:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents


(Posted) RD: Werner Schulz

Article: Werner Schulz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): TAG24
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German politician of the Greens, active in the Peaceful Revolution, later member of parliament (CEO of his party there) and European parliament. He collapsed at the president's office at a memorial event where he was siüüpsed to speak. The article isn't yet where I want it, but I'm busy today, - please check and help. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Operation Barkhane

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Operation Barkhane (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ France ends its military operation against Islamist insurgents in the Sahel. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ France ends Operation Barkhane against Islamist insurgents in the Sahel.
News source(s): BBC AfricaNews
Credits:
Nominator's comments: All troops withdrawn from Mali. Several troops are left in neighboring countries but are awaiting for their roles to be reassigned. Decade-long military intervention that's now over. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 14:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Significant geopolitical event. The citation for the withdrawal used the deprecated parenthetical format, but I've reformatted it. There are some proseline issues, but not enough to disqualify it. POV issues should also be looked into (as is often the case, the criticism section presents serious POV concerns). I prefer the first blurb. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this is now past tense the article needs a few edits to achieve this. Also the infobox has quite a bit of bloat - for instance Charles III is listed under "commanders and leaders" which is a case of "technically I see what you are doing but in reality it looks silly". --LukeSurl t c 16:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Article could use a little more information about the end of this operation. The sentence just prior to the one announcing the end of the operation in the article seems to suggest that there are still French troops there, and that the operation is being reformulated, so this could use a little more clarification. SpencerT•C 01:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment article missing aftermath/conclusion and it is unclear what they did. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per Thebiguglyalien PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Seems to be mostly a regrouping: "Around 3,000 French soldiers remain in Burkina Faso, Chad and Niger. There are no immediate plans for a reduction in numbers." The insurgencies in the Sahel and Mahgreb continue. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Significant geopolitical event, indeed. Definitely for ITN.BabbaQ (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Interesting, well sourced, informative. Jusdafax (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is a significant geopolitical event that substantially impacts the security situation in the Sahel. This warrants inclusion at ITN. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I see this marked as "ready" but not seeing the level of expansion for this to be ready IMO. I did leave a comment above stating that more clarification is needed, so will leave to another admin to assess. At present, all the article has for the past 3 months is: French forces completed their withdrawal from Mali on 15 August.[13] The French military stated that 3,000 troops will remain in the Sahel region as part of Operation Barkhane and added that it was not ending, but being reformulated.[14] However on November 9, Macron announced the end of Operation Barkhane and stated that some French troops will remain in the region under new arrangements. More clarification is needed regarding what "new arrangements" actually means. SpencerT•C 02:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Hans-Joachim Klein

Article: Hans-Joachim Klein (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Ouest France
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German militant, associate of Carlos the JackalDumelow (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bao Tong

Article: Bao Tong (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: "The most senior Communist Party official imprisoned over the Tiananmen protests" KTC (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kirill Stremousov

Article: Kirill Stremousov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Head of the Russian-occupied Kherson government - allegedly died in a car crash hours before Russia's retreat — Chevvin 16:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gal Costa

Article: Gal Costa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Morre Gal Costa, uma das maiores vozes da música brasileira, aos 77 anos
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Brazilian singer of popular music 4me689 (talk) 15:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Bill Treacher

Article: Bill Treacher (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [12]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Arthur Fowler in EastEnders. Announced today. Stephen 20:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tom Owen

Article: Tom Owen (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: One of the last of the Last of the Summer Wine. Played Compo Simmonite's son after the death of his real life father Bill Owen, among other credits. Death announced this date. CoatCheck (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Leslie Phillips

Article: Leslie Phillips (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [13] [14]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British actor, died yesterday but first reported today. The article starts off well but needs a lot of work on sourcing after that. Thryduulf (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Roger Bhatnagar

Article: Roger Bhatnagar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indian News Link
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian-born New Zealand businessman. Quite short, I've added a little from the above source. More expansion might be possible once obits are published - Dumelow (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: