Jump to content

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of Chicago

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
Argued October 10, 2017
Decided November 8, 2017
Full case nameHamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al.
Docket no.16-658
Citations583 U.S. ___ (more)
138 S. Ct. 13; 199 L. Ed. 2d 249
Case history
Prior835 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2016)
Holding
Failure to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4(a)(5)(C) does not necessitate dismissal of a case.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(C)

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, 583 U.S. ___ (2017), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, holding that failure to comply with the deadline for filing a notice of appeal, established by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4(a)(5)(C), does not necessitate dismissal of a case.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of Chicago, No. 16-658, 583 U.S. ___, slip op. at 1, 10 (2017).
[edit]