Examine individual changes

'{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |archiveprefix=User talk:Wikipedialuva/Archives/ |format=Y/F |age=2160 |archivebox=yes |box-advert=yes}} == Editor expeirence invitation == Hi Wikipedialuva :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview [[User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections|here]]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 00:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) == A Thousand Times Repent vandal == I am sorry about my attitude. I just thought the other user was being very unreasonable considering I was just removing stuff that was backed up by a false source and he accused me being 'unconstructive' or something. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/158.140.53.34|158.140.53.34]] ([[User talk:158.140.53.34#top|talk]]) 09:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Also just so you know he keeps edit warring and bringing back this false info even though I've said numerous times the information is false and the source is not reliable nor does the info in the unreliable source even say what is being claimed on the page. Look at history for [[A Thousand Times Repent]] I have said this before and he keeps vandalizing the page with the false info with false source. :No worries. After your edit summary, I stopped reverting because you clarified why you were making the edits you were. I could see why you were removing the edits, as the edits you reverted did cite sources that the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources]] had ranked "generally unreliable" (though not being deprecated or blacklisted). It's best to clarify why you do something in every edit summary, not just certain ones. It's also important to remember that even if you are "right", the [[WP:3RR|edit warring/3-revert-rule]] still applies and should generally not be reverted without first discussing the issue on the article's talkpage and coming to a consensus. In general, try to make sure every edit explains why you are making the edit; if an edit does get reverted, reach out to the edit on their talk page or ping them on the article's talk page; and try to avoid reverting more than three times, as this is considered edit warring (even if you are "right"). If you find yourself getting very frustrated when editing (which happens to almost everyone), the essay "[[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot]]" can be helpful. (Posting to IP talkpage as well). Thanks! [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC) I hate to ask you to get you further involved but do you think think you can maybe restore my edits? Cuz he won't quit and I just wanted to help by keeping incorrect info off the page. Idk what his problem is. Thanks for your kind attitude. Just asking if you could do that for me cuz any time I try to restore it he always comes back so long as it's done by me. It's definitely vandalism since he persists in re-adding false / improperly sourced information.... :It appears {{u|AlphaBetaGamma}} has already done so. [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 10:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) :Yeah sorry for suddenly intervening but I've warned Rahio and explained the case. [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 10:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC) :@[[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] Nevermind it seems Rahio1234 and the IP has gone full heated, should I file a ANI/EW discussion? [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 10:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC) He just keeps on reverting me because he doesnt like me I guess. He followed me to another page and started reverting me there as well...Im not trying to cause any problems, but he started doing it on [[Downthesun]]. No need to open a discussion because Im done with this guy i'll leave it up to you. Idk what the big deal about changing a short description on a page to reflect the lede is though but he seems to have a huge problem with any edit I make. I dont know whats wrong with this guy but please tell me why I'm not allowed to edit the Downthesun article either? He just wants to revert anything I do.......Either way I have better things to do than deal with this absurdity. :Yeah I've reverted you edits --[[Special:Contributions/118.172.25.92|118.172.25.92]] ([[User talk:118.172.25.92|talk]]) 11:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) :Yeah this is out of control, reporting to ANI and also RPPing pages [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC) ::{{re|AlphaBetaGamma}} While I generally try to avoid ANI when possible, I agree that, at this point, reporting to ANI is probably the best course of action. This is no longer just a simple edit war on a single page. [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 11:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC) Hi Rahio1234 ^ :) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/158.140.53.34|158.140.53.34]] ([[User talk:158.140.53.34#top|talk]]) 11:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == I have sent you a note about a page you started == Hi Wikipedialuva. Thank you for your work on [[McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder]]. Another editor, [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]], has reviewed it as part of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new pages patrol]] and left the following comment: {{Bq|1=An appropriate page for a screening test, supported by sources independent of the group creating it, and having survived in use for more than 20 years (sustained coverage).}} To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 15:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC) == Autopatrolled granted == [[File:Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg|right|80px]] Hi Wikipedialuva, I just wanted to let you know that I have <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AWikipedialuva added]</span> the [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled|autopatrolled user right]] to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the [[Special:NewPagesFeed|new pages feed]]. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled|requested]] on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new page patrollers]]. Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] templates, [[Wikipedia:Stub|stub tags]], [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categories]], and [[Wikipedia:Orphan|incoming links]] to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as [[User:Evad37/rater|Rater]] and [[User:SD0001/StubSorter|StubSorter]] can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Core content policies|core content policies]], you might also consider volunteering to become a [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new page patroller]] yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! [[User:Just Step Sideways|Just Step Sideways]] [[User talk:Just Step Sideways|^{from this world ..... today}]] 22:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC) == I have sent you a note about a page you started == Hi Wikipedialuva. Thank you for your work on [[Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder]]. Another editor, [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]], has reviewed it as part of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new pages patrol]] and left the following comment: {{Bq|1=Similar notability to similar screening tests at [[List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry#Personality and personality disorders]]. Concisely-written and sufficiently referenced for a start. Of course, an omnibus merge to combine the many small articles on such scales might be warranted in the future.}} To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 16:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC) == I have sent you a note about a page you started == Hi Wikipedialuva. Thank you for your work on [[Lakeland Regional Health Medical Center]]. Another editor, [[User:SunDawn|SunDawn]], has reviewed it as part of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new pages patrol]] and left the following comment: {{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}} To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> [[User:SunDawn|<span style="background-color:black; color:orange;">&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;</span>]] [[User talk:SunDawn|<span style="color:blue;"><span style="font-size:85%;">(contact)</span></span>]] 03:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC) == Hello == I'm just wondering how you find vandalism to revert. I saw it done on a page and you fixed it, and I wondered if you just scrolled through pages looking for it or something else? [[User:Vemocleus|Vemocleus]] ([[User talk:Vemocleus|talk]]) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) :{{re|Vemocleus}} Hi! Its great to hear you want to get involved in fixing vandalism! There are a few ways to find vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a good overview of the topic here: [[Wikipedia:SPOTVAN]]. Personally, I think a great place to find vandalism is the [[Special:RecentChanges]] board with filters like "May be bad faith" added. The [[Special:AbuseLog]] is another good place to find vandalism. :If you are interested in learning about gaining skills to revert vandalism, I would recommend reading the page "[[Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism]]". I would also consider enrolling in the "[[WP:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy|Counter Vandalism Academy]]", where experienced editors will work with you to teach you how to address vandalism. :Once you gain some experience, you can begin using tools like "[[WP:RedWarn|RedWarn]]", a tool that helps automate some of the vandalism actions, which making addressing vandalism faster and easier. Once you have more significant experience (at least 200 edits and a month of experience with handling vandalism) with anti-vandalism, you can apply for the "[[WP:Rollback|Rollback]]" permission. This permission allows the use of tools like "[[WP:Huggle|Huggle]]" and "[[WP:AntiVandal|AntiVandal]]", which will show your possible vandalism and allow you to revert it with a single keystroke. :If you have any questions, feel free to message me or post them on the [[Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit|Counter-Vandalism Unit talk page]]. Thanks! [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 08:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC) ::Thank you so much! [[User:Vemocleus|Vemocleus]] ([[User talk:Vemocleus|talk]]) 08:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC) == AWB request == Hi Wikipedialuva, hope all is well {{smiley}} Would you be able to run AWB on [[Ed Flemke]] to clean up duplicate references? Thanks! [[User:Wracking|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;border-radius:9em;background:#E0E8E0; color:#1a4c39; padding:4px;">Wracking</span>]]&nbsp;^{[[User talk:Wracking|talk!]]} 22:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC) :{{RE|Wracking}}: {{done}}. I also did some light fixes and manual copy editing on the second edit to the article. Thanks for the suggestion! [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 01:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) ::Much appreciated! [[User:Wracking|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;border-radius:9em;background:#E0E8E0; color:#1a4c39; padding:4px;">Wracking</span>]]&nbsp;^{[[User talk:Wracking|talk!]]} 01:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC) == BBL Drizzy == Hi Mr. Luva. Why you keep on removing BBL Drizzy???? That's how his albums are credited now on Apple Music! [[User:Stereoyum|Stereoyum]] ([[User talk:Stereoyum|talk]]) 11:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :If you're a real Wiki Luva you shouldn't edit this way in my opinion [[User:Stereoyum|Stereoyum]] ([[User talk:Stereoyum|talk]]) 11:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) ::He's credited as BBL Drizzy. Everybody knows. I just wanted to follow [[WP: MOS]] [[User:Stereoyum|Stereoyum]] ([[User talk:Stereoyum|talk]]) 11:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC) ::Hello {{u|Stereoyum}}. I am not aware of any policy in [[WP:MOS]] that would support the change of names you have been performing. If you feel that the artist "Drake" should be changed to "Drizzy BBL" across Wikipedia, such a change would need to first need to gain [[WP:consensus]]. One place to start such a discussion might be on a Wikiproject like the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hip hop|talk page]] of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Hip hop|WikiProject Hip hop]]. Thanks. [[User:Wikipedialuva|Wikipedialuva]] ([[User talk:Wikipedialuva#top|talk]]) 11:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :::Oh I will start such discussion then. Thank you! [[User:Stereoyum|Stereoyum]] ([[User talk:Stereoyum|talk]]) 11:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC) == Introduction to contentious topics == {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people''', a topic designated as '''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: *adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia; *comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; *follow editorial and behavioural best practice; *comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and *refrain from gaming the system. <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> — [[User:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: #660000">Red-tailed&nbsp;hawk</span>]]&nbsp;_{[[User talk:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: #660000">(nest)</span>]]} 15:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)'