Jump to content

User contributions for 174.66.234.150

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

19 March 2024

28 November 2023

27 November 2023

  • 09:5409:54, 27 November 2023 diff hist +4,378 PastorUndid revision 1186997821 by Veverve (talk) Strong, Duffy, Sullivan, Brown, The Catholic Encyclopedia, and Bavinck (9 out of 13 citations added) are not primary sources and are therefore not original research (certainly not "mostly"). The clarify tag also has nothing to do with original research, and should not have been removed. Please do not remove these edits again without stronger justification, and do not start an edit war over this. Tags: Undo Reverted

26 November 2023

  • 16:2616:26, 26 November 2023 diff hist +4,378 PastorFixed formatting error, added tags for needed clarification and needed citation, and added new information about the interchangeability of the terms "bishop" and "presbyter" in the Early Church (with new citations). Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:3513:35, 26 November 2023 diff hist −34 Jim KirbyFixed typos and added hyperlink for "washing machine." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:3113:31, 26 November 2023 diff hist +58 History of the papacy→‎Early Christianity: Added some tags for needed clarification: the sources cited in this paragraph don't clarify which church declaration is being cited (one of the citations is from the recent Vatican II council, but it remains unclear if this council or others are being referenced by this claim) and who views "the college of the Bishops" to be a distinct entity. Also added a hyperlink for "Church Fathers" for necessary context. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:1913:19, 26 November 2023 diff hist +130 History of the papacy→‎Early Christianity: Added some tags for needed clarification and for unsourced claims. Also adjusted some sentences to match the context of other nearby claims (eg, "Peter's claimed successors" to fit with "Many of the bishops of Rome...are obscure figures" and "Peter and those claimed to be his immediate successors"). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:0113:01, 26 November 2023 diff hist +52 History of the papacyMade this article more NPOV by noting that the claims made in the intro paragraph (and in several other parts of this article) are specifically from a Catholic perspective. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 November 2023

27 October 2023

21 October 2023

16 May 2023

13 May 2023

20 April 2023

17 April 2023

29 March 2023

  • 19:0119:01, 29 March 2023 diff hist +1 Rock hyraxFixed typo (corrected "Elicott's" to Ellicott's). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 18:5618:56, 29 March 2023 diff hist +109 Rock hyraxThe cited source I provided notes that the Hebrew word שָׁפָן was also interpreted as not being the rock hyrax, meaning that it should not be stated here that the word translated as "coney" (lit. rabbit) in the King James Bible definitively refers to the rock hyrax, but rather that it has been interpreted by some as possibly referring to the rock hyrax. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

27 March 2023

  • 22:4022:40, 27 March 2023 diff hist +26 Tabernacle→‎Subsequent history: Noted that the ESV translation given as to why the Ark and Tabernacle may have been in Bethel for a time is not definitive and is only a possible transation, as other translations translate the word rendered in Judg. 20:28 as "Bethel" (ESV) literally as "house of God." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 March 2023

13 March 2023

  • 08:2008:20, 13 March 2023 diff hist +22 Vetus LatinaCitation needed tag added for an unsourced claim. "Bonae voluntatis" and "consolationis" are not the same words, so, there certainly needs to be a citation that incidates they are synonyms. For example, "in homnibus consolationis" may mean "to men's comfort" (as "consolationis" does not literally mean "will" like "voluntatis" does).

12 March 2023

22 February 2023

3 February 2023

12 January 2023

  • 09:0809:08, 12 January 2023 diff hist +6 Dan (ancient city)→‎Laish/Leshem: Citation needed tag for an unsourced claim. Brenton's Septuagint translation states "any one" not "Aram" in these verses (Judg. 18:7, 18:28) in agreement with the MT tradition, so is this statement possibly referring to a different Septuagintal manuscript tradition? Hence the very necessary citation needed. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 November 2022

18 November 2022

15 November 2022

7 November 2022

5 November 2022