User contributions for 2601:1:3000:116:3D4A:FB7E:27DA:5EF6
Appearance
For 2601:1:3000:116:3D4A:FB7E:27DA:5EF6 talk block log logs global block log filter log
20 June 2014
- 19:4919:49, 20 June 2014 diff hist +3 Vorarephilia The article pushed a POV that considered the fetish a condition needing cured, by selective elimination of information that might counter this narrative. I've retained their criticisms, while providing context, so that readers may make up their own minds
- 19:4219:42, 20 June 2014 diff hist +421 Vorarephilia No edit summary
9 June 2014
- 14:3414:34, 9 June 2014 diff hist +79 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:3114:31, 9 June 2014 diff hist −17 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:3014:30, 9 June 2014 diff hist −12 A Voice for Men Stop trying to pretend it's only controversial because it criticizes feminism. That's POV, and a misrepresentation of its critics.
- 14:0614:06, 9 June 2014 diff hist −5 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:0614:06, 9 June 2014 diff hist −37 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 13:5413:54, 9 June 2014 diff hist −83 A Voice for Men There is nothing that's in dispute here. Everything is sourced. We wouldn't protect the modern Klan from bad PR, it's inappropriate for a male dominated site like Wikipedia to protect a site which hates women.
- 13:2213:22, 9 June 2014 diff hist 0 A Voice for Men Read the links before reverting this edit. Everything I've said is included in 2 and 3.
- 13:1913:19, 9 June 2014 diff hist +141 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 13:1613:16, 9 June 2014 diff hist +325 A Voice for Men Undid revision 612210071 by Rrburke (talk)
- 13:0813:08, 9 June 2014 diff hist −17 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 13:0213:02, 9 June 2014 diff hist +3 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 12:5912:59, 9 June 2014 diff hist +55 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 12:5512:55, 9 June 2014 diff hist +649 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 12:4812:48, 9 June 2014 diff hist +284 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 11:3711:37, 9 June 2014 diff hist +26 A Voice for Men There are many anti-feminist organizations which aren't this controversial.
8 June 2014
- 23:3123:31, 8 June 2014 diff hist +974 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:3914:39, 8 June 2014 diff hist +276 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:2414:24, 8 June 2014 diff hist +107 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 14:1814:18, 8 June 2014 diff hist +1,241 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 05:5205:52, 8 June 2014 diff hist +153 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 05:2805:28, 8 June 2014 diff hist −179 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 05:2605:26, 8 June 2014 diff hist +194 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 05:2205:22, 8 June 2014 diff hist +417 Talk:A Voice for Men No edit summary
7 June 2014
- 12:4312:43, 7 June 2014 diff hist +173 A Voice for Men Stop turning this into an ad for A Voice for Men. Stop reverting more honest edits, in order to push the site's POV.
6 June 2014
- 16:5916:59, 6 June 2014 diff hist +91 A Voice for Men Please stop turning this into an ad for A Voice for Men. There is nothing NPOV about deleting specific reasons why the site is under fire.
30 May 2014
- 11:3711:37, 30 May 2014 diff hist −201 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 11:3611:36, 30 May 2014 diff hist +96 A Voice for Men Corrected disputed material to more neutral terms.
- 11:2011:20, 30 May 2014 diff hist −14 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 11:1311:13, 30 May 2014 diff hist +106 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 10:5810:58, 30 May 2014 diff hist 0 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 10:5610:56, 30 May 2014 diff hist +213 A Voice for Men No edit summary
- 10:3410:34, 30 May 2014 diff hist +61 A Voice for Men Can we please prevent editors too close to the subject from hiding the issues A Voice for Men covers which they don't want shared with the public?