User contributions for 2601:1:3000:116:3D4A:FB7E:27DA:5EF6

20 June 2014

• 19:4919:49, 20 June 2014 diff hist +3‎ Vorarephilia ‎ The article pushed a POV that considered the fetish a condition needing cured, by selective elimination of information that might counter this narrative. I've retained their criticisms, while providing context, so that readers may make up their own minds
• 19:4219:42, 20 June 2014 diff hist +421‎ Vorarephilia ‎No edit summary

9 June 2014

• 14:3414:34, 9 June 2014 diff hist +79‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:3114:31, 9 June 2014 diff hist −17‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:3014:30, 9 June 2014 diff hist −12‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Stop trying to pretend it's only controversial because it criticizes feminism. That's POV, and a misrepresentation of its critics.
• 14:0614:06, 9 June 2014 diff hist −5‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:0614:06, 9 June 2014 diff hist −37‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 13:5413:54, 9 June 2014 diff hist −83‎ A Voice for Men ‎ There is nothing that's in dispute here. Everything is sourced. We wouldn't protect the modern Klan from bad PR, it's inappropriate for a male dominated site like Wikipedia to protect a site which hates women.
• 13:2213:22, 9 June 2014 diff hist 0‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Read the links before reverting this edit. Everything I've said is included in 2 and 3.
• 13:1913:19, 9 June 2014 diff hist +141‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 13:1613:16, 9 June 2014 diff hist +325‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Undid revision 612210071 by Rrburke (talk)
• 13:0813:08, 9 June 2014 diff hist −17‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 13:0213:02, 9 June 2014 diff hist +3‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 12:5912:59, 9 June 2014 diff hist +55‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 12:5512:55, 9 June 2014 diff hist +649‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 12:4812:48, 9 June 2014 diff hist +284‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 11:3711:37, 9 June 2014 diff hist +26‎ A Voice for Men ‎ There are many anti-feminist organizations which aren't this controversial.

8 June 2014

• 23:3123:31, 8 June 2014 diff hist +974‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:3914:39, 8 June 2014 diff hist +276‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:2414:24, 8 June 2014 diff hist +107‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 14:1814:18, 8 June 2014 diff hist +1,241‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 05:5205:52, 8 June 2014 diff hist +153‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 05:2805:28, 8 June 2014 diff hist −179‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 05:2605:26, 8 June 2014 diff hist +194‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 05:2205:22, 8 June 2014 diff hist +417‎ Talk:A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary

7 June 2014

• 12:4312:43, 7 June 2014 diff hist +173‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Stop turning this into an ad for A Voice for Men. Stop reverting more honest edits, in order to push the site's POV.

6 June 2014

• 16:5916:59, 6 June 2014 diff hist +91‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Please stop turning this into an ad for A Voice for Men. There is nothing NPOV about deleting specific reasons why the site is under fire.

30 May 2014

• 11:3711:37, 30 May 2014 diff hist −201‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 11:3611:36, 30 May 2014 diff hist +96‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Corrected disputed material to more neutral terms.
• 11:2011:20, 30 May 2014 diff hist −14‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 11:1311:13, 30 May 2014 diff hist +106‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 10:5810:58, 30 May 2014 diff hist 0‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 10:5610:56, 30 May 2014 diff hist +213‎ A Voice for Men ‎No edit summary
• 10:3410:34, 30 May 2014 diff hist +61‎ A Voice for Men ‎ Can we please prevent editors too close to the subject from hiding the issues A Voice for Men covers which they don't want shared with the public?