User contributions for 2A00:A041:E180:D800:1184:2040:1CF9:E514
Appearance
For 2A00:A041:E180:D800:1184:2040:1CF9:E514 talk block log logs global block log filter log
8 March 2024
- 23:0323:03, 8 March 2024 diff hist +304 Amhara people The sources which are shown link Amhara to Aksum and show the Christianisation of the Amhara or Porto Amhara to begin with this period of the entry of the religion to the country. While the former edit mentioned nothing whatsoever of what the sources which are link to it say. Neither of the two. Everybody is welcome to check them for themselves Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 22:5222:52, 8 March 2024 diff hist +304 Amhara people Those sources do not say that the Christianisation of Amhara begin in the reign of this king or late Aksumite empire period. How can such misinformation be left on the page for so long without anyone intervening? Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 22:3122:31, 8 March 2024 diff hist +304 Amhara people No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 22:2422:24, 8 March 2024 diff hist +362 User talk:2800:E2:7980:107A:11B3:9B30:A1AB:C6D0 →March 2024: Reply current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 22:1722:17, 8 March 2024 diff hist −589 Amhara people No edit summary Tags: Reverted missing file added references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 22:1222:12, 8 March 2024 diff hist +1,280 Amhara people The sources with the pages mention doesn’t say this at all. Reverse edit back to former status which in fact say what the sources mentioned say. Especially after reviewing the talk page Tags: Reverted missing file added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:5215:52, 8 March 2024 diff hist +1 User talk:CtasACT →Amhara people page Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:5115:51, 8 March 2024 diff hist +359 User talk:CtasACT →Amhara people page: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic